Wrongful birth: Clinical settings and legal implications

Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 312-316

  Hassan, Majid ^a   Chitty, Lyn ^b   Reardon, Harry ^a  

^a Capsticks Solicitors   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical negligence; Compensation; Disability; Wrongful birth

Indexed keywords

ARTHROGRYPOSIS; CASE REPORT; COMPENSATION; CONGENITAL DISORDER; COURT; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS MALFORMATION; FLATFOOT; GESTATIONAL AGE; GOLD STANDARD; GOLDENHAR SYNDROME; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEGLIGENCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT; SCREENING; UNITED KINGDOM; UNWANTED PREGNANCY; WRONGFUL BIRTH; WRONGFUL LIFE; ETHICS; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALPRACTICE;

HUMANS; MALPRACTICE; WRONGFUL LIFE;

EID: 84927628868     PISSN: 1744165X     EISSN: 18780946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. This 'nominal award' was set as £15,000 in Rees; however, subsequent cases, such as Less v Hussain [2012] EWHC 3513 (QB), have suggested that a higher figure would now be awarded, in the region of £25,000.
2. McKay v Essex Area Health Authority [1986] 1 All ER 54 and section 1(5) of the Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976.
3. Per Lord Millett in McFarlane pp108H to 109A.
4. Turpin v Sortini 643 P.2d 954 (Cal. 1982).
5. Civil Liability Act 2003, ss49A and 49B.
6. NHS Litigation Authority Ten years of maternity claims 2012, NHSLA, London.
7. Tegnander E., Eik-Nes S.H. The examiner's ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second-trimester fetal examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006, 28:8-14.
8. Royal College of Obstatricians and Gynaecologists Antenatal ultrasound screening: ultrasound survey of England 2002 2005, RCOG, London.
9. Standards 6 and 7 and Appendix 1 of the NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme: 18+0 weeks to 20+6 weeks Fetal Anomaly Scan National Standards and Guidance for England [available at: ]. http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/standardsandpolicies.
10. Chitty L.S., Hunt G.H., Moore J., Lobb M.O. Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. BMJ 1991, 303:1165-1169.
11. Shirley I.M., Bottomley F., Robinson V.P. Routine radiographer screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in an unselected low risk population. Br J Radiol 1992, 65:564-569.
12. Luck C.A. Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks: a four year study of 8849 deliveries. BMJ 1992, 304:1474-1478.
13. Boyd P.A., Chamberlain P., Hicks N.R. 6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK. Lancet 1998, 352:1577-1581.
14. Smith N.C., Hau C. Asix year study of the antenatal detection of fetal abnormality in six Scottish health boards. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999, 106:206-212.
15. Smith-Bindman R., Hosmer W., Feldstein V.A., Deeks J.J., Goldberg J.D. Second-trimester ultrasound to detect fetus uses with Down syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001, 285:1044-1055.
16. Bryant L., Fisher A., Vicente F., Social Research and Regeneration Unit A, University of Plymouth Centre Fetal anomaly ultrasound screening programme study: literature survey June 2007.
17. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Working Party Ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities 2000, RCOG, London.