A Bayesian central equivalent dose model for optically stimulated luminescence dating

Quaternary Geochronology

Volumn 28, Issue , 2015, Pages 62-70

  Combès, Benoit ^a   Philippe, Anne ^b   Lanos, Philippe ^a   Mercier, Norbert ^a   Tribolo, Chantal ^a   Guerin, Guillaume ^a   Guibert, Pierre ^a   Lahaye, Christelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX MONTAIGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Chronometric dating; Optically stimulated luminescence

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; GEOCHRONOLOGY; LUMINESCENCE DATING; OPTICAL METHOD; STANDARD (REFERENCE);

EID: 84927617543     PISSN: 18711014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Buck C., Cavanagh W., Litton C. Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data 1996, Wiley.
2. Buck C., Kenworthy J., Litton C., Smith A. Combining archaeological and radiocarbon information: a bayesian approach to calibration. Antiquity 1991, 65:808-821.
3. Duller G. Analyst. Manual 2001, University of Wales.
4. Duller G. Assessing the error on equivalent dose estimates derived from single aliquot regenerative dose measurements. Anc. TL 2007, 25:15-24.
5. Galbraith R., Roberts R. Statistical aspects of equivalent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating: an overview and some recommendations. Quat. Geochronol. 2012, 11:1-27.
6. Galbraith R., Roberts R., Yoshida H.Y. Error variation in OSL palaeodose estimates from single aliquots of quartz: a factorial experiment. Radiat. Meas. 2005, 39:289-307.
7. Galbraith R.F., Roberts R.G., Laslett G.M., Yoshida H., Olley J.M. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from jinmium rock shelter, northern australia: Part 1, experimental design and statistical models. Archaeometry 1999, 41:339-364.
8. Gelman A. Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Anal. 2006, 1:1-19.
9. Gelman A., Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 1992, 7:457-472.
10. Geweke J. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Bayesian Statistics 1992, 169-193. University Press.
11. Huntley D., Godfrey-Smith D., Thewalt M. Optical dating of sediments. Nature 1985, 313:105-107.
12. Huntriss A. ABayesian Analysis of Luminescence Dating 2007, (Ph.D. thesis), University of Durham, UK.
13. Jacobs Z., Duller G., Wintle A. Interpretation of single grain De distributions and calculation of De. Radiat. Meas. 2006, 41:264-277.
14. Kreutzer S., Schmidt C., Fuchs M., Dietze M., Fischer M., Burow C., Fuchs M. Introducing an R package for luminescence dating analysis. Anc. TL 2012, 30:1-8.
15. Marin J., Robert C. Bayesian Core: a Practical Approach to Computational Bayesian Statistics: a Practical Approach to Computational Bayesian Statistics 2007, Springer.
16. Mayya Y., Morthekai P., Murari M., Singhvi A. Towards quantifying beta microdosimetric effects in single-grain quartz dose distribution. Radiat. Meas. 2006, 41:1032-1039.
17. Millard A. Bayesian analysis of ESR dates, with application to Border Cave. Quat. Geochronol. 2006, 1:159-166.
18. Millard A. Bayesian analysis of pleistocene chronometric methods. Archaeometry 2006, 48:359-375.
19. Moré J. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. Numer. Anal. 1978, 630:105-116.
20. Murray A., Wintle A. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiat. Meas. 2000, 32:57-73.
21. Pericchi L., Perez M. Limiting the Shrinkage for the Exceptional by Robust Bayes 2010, Technical Report, University of Puerto Rico.
22. Plummer M. Jags: a program for analysis of bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Distributed Statistical Computing 2003.
23. Sivia D.S., Burbidge C., Roberts R.G., Bailey R.M. ABayesian approach to the evaluation of equivalent doses in sediment mixtures for luminescence dating. AIP Conference Proceedings 2004, 735:305-311.
24. Thomsen K., Murray A., Bøtter-Jensen L. Sources of variability in OSL dose measurements using single grains of quartz. Radiat. Meas. 2005, 39:47-61.
25. Thomsen K., Murray A., Jain M. The dose dependency of the over-dispersion of quartz OSL single grain dose distributions. Radiat. Meas. 2012, 47:732-739.
26. Wintle A., Murray A. Areview of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiat. Meas. 2006, 41:369-391.
27. Zink A. Acoarse bayesian approach to evaluate luminescence ages. Geochronometria 2013, 40:90-100.