Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: Integrated evaluation

Animal

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2058-2068

  Bonneau, M ^a   Klauke, T N ^b   Gonzalez J ^c   Rydhmer, L ^d   Ilari Antoine, E ^e   Dourmad, J Y ^a   De Greef, K ^f   Houwers, H W J ^f   Cinar, M U ^b   Fabrega E ^c   Zimmer, C ^g   Hviid, M ^h   Van Der Oever, B ^i,k   Edwards, S A ^j  

^a PEGASE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^c IRTA   (Spain)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^e Pôle Economie   (France)

^f WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g Bäuerliche Erzeugergemeinschaft Schwäbisch Hall ^*  (Germany)

^h DANISH TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

ⁱ Swine Research Centre   (Netherlands)

^j NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^k ForFarmers BV   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

evaluation; farming system; pig; sustainability

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; BREEDING; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; SWINE;

EID: 84927609492     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114002122     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barba C, Delgado JV, Sereno JRB, Dieguez E, Forero J, Jaume J and Peinado B 2001. Performances of the Iberian and other local breeds of Spain. In Pig genetic resources in Europe: characterisation and conservation (ed. L Ollivier, F Labroue, P Glodek, G Gandini and JV Delgado), pp 77-83. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
2. Basset-Mens C and Van der Werf HMG 2005. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105, 127-144.
3. Binder CR, Feola G and Steinberger JK 2010. Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30, 71-81.
4. Binder CR, Schmid A and Steinberger JK 2012. Sustainability solution space of the Swiss milk value added chain. Ecological Economics 83, 210-220.
5. Bongers P, Houthuijs D, Remijn B, Brouwer R and Biersteker K 1987. Lung function and respiratory symptoms in pig farmers. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 44, 819-823.
6. Bonneau M, De Greef K, Brinkman D, Cinar MU, Dourmad JY, Edge HL, Fàbrega E, Gonzàlez J, Houwers HWJ, Hviid M, Ilari-Antoine E, Klauke TN, Phatsara C, Rydhmer L, Van der Oever B, Zimmer C and Edwards SA 2014. Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming system: the procedure, the evaluated systems and the evaluation tools. Animal, doi:10.1017/S1751731114002110.
7. Boogaard BK, Boekhorst LJS, Oosting SJ and Sørensen JT 2011. Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark. Livestock Science 140, 189-200.
8. Brundtland GH 1987. Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Casabianca F and Vallerand F 1994. Gérer les races locales d'animaux domestiques -Une dialectique entre ressources génétiques et développement régional [Management of local breeds of domestic animals: a dialectic between genetic resources and regional development.]-. Genetics Selection Evolution 26 (suppl. 1), 343s-357s.
10. De Greef KH, Houwers HWJ and Bonneau M 2013. Societal conformity of European pig production systems. 64th Annual Meeting of the EAAP, Nantes, France, 26-30 August.
11. Dourmad JY, Ryschawy J, Trousson T, Bonneau M, Gonzàlez J, Houwers HWJ, Hviid M, Zimmer C, Nguyen TLT and Morgensen L 2014. Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment. Animal, doi:10.1017/S1751731114002134.
12. Fosse J, Seegers H and Magras C 2009. Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial food-borne zoonotic hazards in slaughter pigs: a review. Zoonoses Public Health 56, 429-454.
13. Fosse J, Laroche M, Oudot N, Seegers H and Magras C 2011. On-farm multicontamination of pigs by food-borne bacterial zoonotic hazards: an exploratory study. Veterinary Microbiology 147, 209-213.
14. Gonzàlez J, Gispert M, Gil M, Hviid M, Dourmad JY, De Greef K, Zimmer C and Fàbrega E 2014. Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: development of a market conformity tool for pork products based on technological quality traits. Animal, doi:10.1017/S1751731114002146.
15. Ilari-Antoine E, Bonneau M, Klauke TN, Gonzàlez J, Dourmad JY, De Greef K, Houwers HWJ, Fàbrega E, Zimmer C, Hviid M, Van der Oever B and Edwards SA 2014. Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig husbandry systems: economy. Animal, doi:10.1017/S1751731114002158.
16. Labroue F, Marsac H, Luquet M, Gruand J, Mourot J, Neelz V, Legault C and Ollivier L 2001. Performances of French local breeds. In Pig genetic resources in Europe: characterisation and conservation (ed. L Ollivier, F Labroue, P Glodek, G Gandini and JV Delgado), pp 51-57. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
17. Lopez-Bote CJ 1998. Sustained utilization of the Iberian pig breed. Meat science 49 (suppl. 1), S17-S27.
18. López-Ridaura S, Masera O and Astier M 2002. Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. The MESMIS framework. Ecological Indicators 2, 135-148.
19. Mollenhorst H, Berentsen PBM and De Boer IJM 2006. On farm quantification of sustainability indicators: an application to egg production systems. British Poultry Science 47, 405-417.
20. Porcher J 2011. The relationship beween workers and animals in the pork industry: a shared suffering. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24, 3-17.
21. R Development Core Team 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved August 19, 2012, from http://www.R-project.org
22. Ribbens S, Dewulf J, Koenen F, Mintiens K, De Sadeleer L, de Kruif A and Maes D 2008. A survey on biosecurity and management practices in Belgian pig herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 83, 228-241.
23. Ripoll-Bosch R, Diez-Unquera B, Ruiz R, Villalba D, Molina E, Joy M, Olaizola A and Bernues A 2012. An integrated sustainability assessment of Mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agricultural Systems 105, 46-56.
24. Rydhmer L, Gourdine JL, De Greef K and Bonneau M 2014. Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: breeding programmes. Animal, doi:10.1017/S175173111400216X.
25. Vaarst M, Padel S, Hovi M, Younie D and Sundrum A 2005. Sustaining animal health and food safety in European organic livestock farming. Livestock Production Science 94, 61-69.
26. Van Calker KJ, Berentsen PBM, Giesen GWJ and Huirne RBM 2005. Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming. Agriculture and Human Values 22, 53-63.
27. Van Cauwenbergh N, Biala K, Bielders C, Brouckaert V, Franchois L, Garcia Cidad V, Hermy M, Mathijs E, Muys B, Reijnders J, Sauvenier X, Valckx J, Vanclooster M, Van der Veken B, Wauters E and Peeters A 2007. SAFE -a hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 120, 229-242.
28. Vilain L 2003. La méthode IDEA -Guide d'utilisation, deuxième édition enrichie et élargie à l'arboriculture, au maraîchage et à l'horticulture. [The IDEA method, user's guide, second version enriched and extended to arboriculture, market gardening and horticulture], Educagri éditions, 151p.