Biocompatibility and characterization of a peptide amphiphile hydrogel for applications in peripheral nerve regeneration

Tissue Engineering - Part A

Volumn 21, Issue 7-8, 2015, Pages 1333-1342

  Black, Katie A ^a,b   Lin, Brian F ^a   Wonder, Emily A ^c   Desai, Seema S ^a   Chung, Eun Ji ^c   Ulery, Bret D ^c   Katari, Ravi S ^c   Tirrell, Matthew V ^a,b,c  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIPHILES; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; COLLAGEN; GELS; NEURONS; PEPTIDES;

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS; IMMUNE RESPONSE; NATIVE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; NERVE GUIDE CONDUITS; PEPTIDE AMPHIPHILES; PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATION; PERIPHERAL NERVE REPAIR; PERIPHERAL NERVES;

HYDROGELS;

AMPHOPHILE; COLLAGEN GEL; GLUTATHIONE; PEPTIDE; BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN; GEL; HYDROGEL; SURFACTANT;

ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOENGINEERING; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY; HYDROGEL; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IN VITRO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; MOUSE; NERVE REGENERATION; NONHUMAN; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHWANN CELL; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; BOVINE; CELL MOTION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; GEL; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PHARMACOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

MURINAE;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODY FORMATION; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CATTLE; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; COLLAGEN; FEMALE; GELS; HYDROGEL; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; MICE, INBRED BALB C; NERVE REGENERATION; PEPTIDES; PERIPHERAL NERVES; RATS; SCHWANN CELLS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 84927588676     PISSN: 19373341     EISSN: 1937335X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0297     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Noble, J., Munro, C., and Prasad, V. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 45, 116, 1998.
2. Ray, W.Z., and Mackinnon, S.E. Management of nerve gaps: autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Exp Neurol 223, 77, 2010.
3. Mackinnon, S. New directions in peripheral nerve surgery. Ann Plast Surg 22, 257, 1989.
4. Seckel, B. Enhancement of peripheral nerve regeneration. Muscle Nerve 13, 785, 1990.
5. Meek, M.F., and Coert, J.H. US Food and Drug Administration/ Conformit Europe-approved absorbable nerve conduits for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial nerves. Ann Plast Surg 60, 110, 2008.
6. Kehoe, S., Zhang, X.F., and Boyd, D. FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: a review of materials and efficacy. Injury 43, 553, 2012.
7. Bell, J., and Haycock, J. Next generation nerve guides: materials, fabrication, growth factors, and cell delivery. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 18, 116, 2011.
8. Angius, D., et al. A systematic review of animal models used to study nerve regeneration in tissue-engineered scaffolds. Biomaterials 33, 8034, 2012.
9. Chalfoun, C.T., Wirth, G.A. and Evans, G.R.D. Tissue engineered nerve constructs: where do we stand? J Cell Mol Med 10, 309, 2006.
10. Lin, Y.-C., and Marra, K.G. Injectable systems and implantable conduits for peripheral nerve repair. Biomed Mater 7, 024102, 2012.
11. Biazar, E., et al. Types of neural guides and using nanotechnology for peripheral nerve reconstruction. Int J Nanomedicine 5, 839, 2010.
12. Belkas, J.S., Shoichet, M.S., and Midha, R. Peripheral nerve regeneration through guidance tubes. Neurol Res 26, 151, 2004.
13. Satou, T., et al. A morphological study on the effects of collagen gel matrix on regeneration of severed rat sciatic nerve in silicone tubes. Pathol Int 36, 199, 1986.
14. Madison, R., da Silva, C.F., Dikkes, P., Chiu, T.H., and Sidman, R.L. Increased rate of peripheral nerve regeneration using bioresorbable nerve guides and a laminincontaining gel. Exp Neurol 88, 767, 1985.
15. Chamberlain, L.J., Yannas, I. V, Hsu, H.P., Strichartz, G.R., and Spector, M. Near-terminus axonal structure and function following rat sciatic nerve regeneration through a collagen-GAG matrix in a ten-millimeter gap. J Neurosci Res 60, 666, 2000.
16. Charriere, G., Bejot, M., Schnitzler, L., Ville, G., and Hartmann, D.J. Reactions to a bovine collagen implant. J Am Acad Dermatol 21, 1203, 1989.
17. Tan, A., Rajadas, J., and Seifalian, A.M. Biochemical engineering nerve conduits using peptide amphiphiles. J Control Release 163, 342, 2012.
18. Trent, A., Marullo, R., Lin, B., Black, M., and Tirrell, M. Structural properties of soluble peptide amphiphile micelles. Soft Matter 7, 9572, 2011.
19. Greenfield, M.A., Hoffman, J.R., de la Cruz, M.O., and Stupp, S.I. Tunable mechanics of peptide nanofiber gels. Langmuir 26, 3641, 2010.
20. Morisco, A., et al. Micelles derivatized with octreotide as potential target-selective contrast agents in MRI. J Pept Sci 15, 242, 2009.
21. Bull, S.R., Guler, M.O., Bras, R.E., Meade, T.J., and Stupp, S.I. Self-assembled peptide amphiphile nanofibers conjugated to MRI contrast agents. Nano Lett 5, 1, 2005.
22. Hartgerink, J.D., Beniash, E., and Stupp, S.I. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 294, 1684, 2001.
23. Spoerke, E.D., Anthony, S.G., and Stupp, S.I. Enzyme directed templating of artificial bone mineral. Adv Mater 21, 425, 2009.
24. Branco, M.C., and Schneider, J.P. Self-assembling materials for therapeutic delivery. Acta Biomater 5, 817, 2009.
25. Webber, M.J., Matson, J.B., Tamboli, V.K., and Stupp, S.I. Controlled release of dexamethasone from peptide nanofiber gels to modulate inflammatory response. Biomaterials 33, 6823, 2012.
26. Bitton, R., et al. Self-assembly of model DNA-binding peptide amphiphiles. Langmuir 21, 11888, 2005.
27. Tu, R.S., et al. Cooperative DNA binding and assembly by a bZip peptide-amphiphile. Soft Matter 6, 1035, 2010.
28. Black, M., et al. Self-assembled peptide amphiphile micelles containing a cytotoxic T-cell epitope promote a protective immune response in vivo. Adv Mater 24, 3845, 2012.
29. Standley, S.M., et al. Induction of cancer cell death by selfassembling nanostructures incorporating a cytotoxic peptide. Cancer Res 70, 3020, 2010.
30. Garg, A., Tisdale, A.W., Haidari, E., and Kokkoli, E. Targeting colon cancer cells using PEGylated liposomes modified with a fibronectin-mimetic peptide. Int J Pharm 366, 201, 2009.
31. Webber, M.J., Berns, E.J., and Stupp, S.I. Supramolecular nanofibers of peptide amphiphiles for medicine. Isr J Chem 53, 1, 2013.
32. Tysseling, V.M., et al. Self-assembling peptide amphiphile promotes plasticity of serotonergic fibers following spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res 88, 3161, 2010.
33. Tysseling-Mattiace, V.M., et al. Self-assembling nanofibers inhibit glial scar formation and promote axon elongation after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 28, 3814, 2008.
34. Bond, C.W., et al. Peptide amphiphile nanofiber delivery of sonic hedgehog protein to reduce smooth muscle apoptosis in the penis after cavernous nerve resection. J Sex Med 8, 78, 2011.
35. Lin, B.F., et al. pH-responsive branched peptide amphiphile hydrogel designed for applications in regenerative medicine with potential as injectable tissue scaffolds. J Mater Chem 22, 19447, 2012.
36. Dubey, N., Letourneau, P.C., and Tranquillo, R.T. Guided neurite elongation and schwann cell invasion into magnetically aligned collagen in simulated peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol 158, 338, 1999.
37. Ceballos, D., et al. Magnetically aligned collagen gel filling a collagen nerve guide improves peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol 158, 290, 1999.
38. Kuipers, B.J.H., and Gruppen, H. Prediction of molar extinction coefficients of proteins and peptides using UV absorption of the constituent amino acids at 214 nm to enable quantitative reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. J Agric Food Chem 55, 5445, 2007.
39. Hai, M., Muja, N., DeVries, G.H., Quarles, R.H., and Patel, P.I. Comparative analysis of Schwann cell lines as model systems for myelin gene transcription studies. J Neurosci Res 69, 497, 2002.
40. Huang, Y.-C., and Huang, Y.-Y. Biomaterials and strategies for nerve regeneration. Artif Organs 30, 514, 2006.
41. Piechocka, I.K., van Oosten, A.S.G., Breuls, R.G.M., and Koenderink, G.H. Rheology of heterotypic collagen networks. Biomacromolecules 12, 2797, 2011.
42. Wang, Y., Teng, H.-L., and Huang, Z. Intrinsic migratory properties of cultured Schwann cells based on single-cell migration assay. PLoS One 7, 1, 2012.
43. Xia, Z., and Triffitt, J.T. A review on macrophage responses to biomaterials. Biomed Mater 1, R1, 2006.
44. Mikos, A., McIntire, L., Anderson, J., and Babensee, J. Host response to tissue engineered devices. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 33, 111, 1998.
45. Ghanaati, S., et al. Dynamic in vivo biocompatibility of angiogenic peptide amphiphile nanofibers. Biomaterials 30, 6202, 2009.
46. Hobson, M.I., Green, C.J., and Terenghi, G. VEGF enhances intraneural angiogenesis and improves nerve regeneration after axotomy. J Anat 197, 591, 2000.
47. Anderson, J.M. Mechanisms of inflammation and infection with implanted devices. Cardiovasc Pathol 2, 33, 1993.