Traditional Chinese Corporations: Beyond Kinship

The Journal of Asian Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 1984, Pages 391-415

  Sangren, P Steven ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927454013     PISSN: 00219118     EISSN: 17520401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2055755     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ahern, Emily M. 1973. The Cult of the Dead in a Chinese Village. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2. Ahern, Emily M. 1976. “Segmentation in Chinese Lineages: A View Through Written Genealogies.” American Ethnologist 3:1-16.
3. Anderson Eugene N., Jr. 1970. “Lineage Atrophy in Chinese Society.” American 72:363-65.
4. Baker, Hugh D. R. 1977. “Extended Kinship in the Traditional City.” In G. William Skinner, ed., The City in Late Imperial China, 499–520. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5. Baker, Hugh D. R. 1979. Chinese Family and Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Barnes, John A. 1962. ‘African Models in the New Guinea Highlands.” Man 62:5-9.
7. Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of the Mind. New York: Ballentine.
8. Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.
9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cohen, Myron L. 1969. ‘Agnatic Kinship in South Taiwan.” Ethnology 8:167-82.
11. Cohen, Myron L. 1970. “Developmental Process in Chinese Domestic Groups.” In Maurice Freedman, ed., Family and Kinship in Chinese Spciety, 21–36. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12. Cohen, Myron L. 1976. House United, House Divided: The Chinese Family in Taiwan. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Crissman, Lawrence W. 1967. “The Segmentary Structure of Urban Overseas Chinese Communities.” Man 2:185-204.
14. Dardess, John W. 1983. Confucianism and Autocracy: Professional Elites in the Founding of the Ming Dynasty. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Davenport, William. 1959- “Nonunilinear Descent and Descent Groups.” American Anthropologist 61:557-72.
16. DeGlopper, Donald R. 1971. “Temple, Faction and Loan Club: Voluntary Associations in a Taiwanese Town.” Paper prepared for the 23rd Annual Meeting, Association for Asian Studies, Washington, D.C., March 1971.
17. DeGlopper, Donald R. 1977. “Social Structure in a Nineteenth-Century Taiwanese Port City.” In G. William Skinner, ed., The City in Late Imperial China, 633–50. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1929. “The Study of Kinship in Primitive Societies.” Man 29:190-93.
19. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1932. “The Nature of Kinship Extensions.” Man 32:12-15.
20. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1950. “Kinship and the Local Community among the Nuer.” In A. R.
22. Radcliffe-Brown, ed., African Systems ofKinship and Marriage, 360–91. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Radcliffe-Brown. 1951. Kinship and Marriage Among the Nuer. London: Oxford University Press.
24. Fortes, Meyer. 1945. The Dynamics of Clanship Among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press.
25. Fortes, Meyer. 1949. The Web of Kinship Among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press.
26. Fortes, Meyer. 1950. “Kinship and Marriage Among the Ashanti.” In A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, ed., African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, 252–84. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Fortes, Meyer. 1953. “The Structure of Unilineal Kin Groups.” American Anthropologist 55:17-41.
28. Fortes, Meyer. 1958. “Introduction.” In Jack Goody, ed., The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Fortes, Meyer. 1959. “Descent, Filiation, and Affinity: A Rejoinder to Dr. Leach.” Man 59: 193-97, 206–12.
30. Freedman, Maurice. 1958. Lineage Organization in Southeastern China. London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology, no. 18. London: Athlone.
31. Fortes, Meyer. 1959. “The Handling of Money: A Note on the Background to the Economic Sophistication of the Overseas Chinese.” Man 59:64-65.
32. Fortes, Meyer. 1966. Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung. London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology, no. 33. London: Athlone.
33. Fortes, Meyer. 1970. “Ritual Aspects of Chinese Kinship and Marriage.” In Maurice Freedman, ed., Family and Kinship in Chinese Society, 163–88. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
34. Fortes, Meyer. 1974. “The Politics of an Old State: A View from the Chinese Lineage.” In John Davis, ed., Choice and Change: Essays in Honour of Lucy Mair, 68–88. London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology, no. 50. London: Athlone.
35. Fried, Morton H. 1966. “Some Political Aspects of Clanship in a Modern Chinese City.” In Marc Jerome Swartz, Victor W. Turner, and Arthur Tuden, eds., Political Anthropology, 285–300. Chicago: Aldine.
36. Fortes, Meyer. 1970. “Clans and Lineages: How to Tell Them Apart and Why, with Special Reference to Chinese Society.’I Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica 29:11-36.
37. Gallin, Bernard. 1966. Hsin Hsing, Taiwan: A Chinese Village in Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. Golas, Peter J. 1977. “Early Ch’ing Guilds.” In G. William Skinner, ed., The City in Late Imperial China, 555–80. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
39. Goodenough, Ward H. 1955. ‘A Problem in Malayo-Polynesian Social Organization.” American Anthropologist 57:71-83.
40. Gough, Kathleen. 1971. “Nuer Kinship: A Reexamination.” In T. Beidelman, ed., The Translation of Culture, 79–121. London: Tavistock.
41. Grootaers, Willem A. 1951. “Rural Temples around Hsuan-hua (South Chahar), Their Iconography and Their History.” Folklore Studies (Museum of Oriental Ethnology, The Catholic University of Peking) 10:1-116.
42. Harrell, Stevan C. 1981. “Social Organization in Hai-shan.” In Emily M. Ahern and Hill Gates, eds., The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society, 125–47. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
43. Holy, Ladislav. 1976. “Kin Groups: Structural Analysis and the Study of Behavior.” In Bernard Siegel, ed., Annual Review of Anthropology, 107–31. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.
44. Jacobs, J. Bruce. 1979. ‘A Preliminary Model of Particularistic Ties in Chinese Political Alliances; Kan-ch’ing and Kuan-hsi in a Rural Taiwanese Township.” China Quarterly 78:237-73.
45. Keesing, Roger M. 1968. “Non-unilineal Descent and Contextual Definition of Status: The Kwaio Evidence.” American Anthropologist 70:82-84.
46. Keesing, Roger M. 1970. “Shrines, Ancestors, and Cognatic Descent: The Kwaio and Tallensi.” American Anthropologist 72:755-75.
47. Knapp, Ronald G. 1976. “Chinese Frontier Settlement in Taiwan.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 66:43-59.
48. Lewis, I. M. 1965. “Problems in the Comparative Study of Unilineal Descent.” In Michael Banton, ed., The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology, 87–112. Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth Monograph, no. 1. London: Tavistock.
49. Myers, Ramon H. 1972a. “Taiwan Under Ch’ing Rule, 1684 - 1895 : The Traditional Economy.” Journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies of the Chinese University of Hong Kong 5:373-409.
50. Myers, Ramon H. 1972b. “Taiwan under Ch’ing Rule, 1684 - 1895 : The Traditional Society.” Journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies of the Chinese University of Hong Kong 5:413-51.
51. Pasternak, Burton. 1968. “Review of Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung, by Maurice Freedman.” American Anthropologist 70:597-98.
52. Pasternak, Burton. 1969. “The Role of the Frontier in Chinese Lineage Development.” Journal of Asian Studies 28:551-61.
53. Pasternak, Burton. 1972. Kinship and Community in Two Chinese Villages. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
54. Potter, Jack M. 1968. Capitalism and the Chinese Peasant: Social and Economic Change in a Hong Kong Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55. Potter, Jack M. 1970. “Land and Lineage in Traditional China.” In Maurice Freedman, ed., Family and Kinship in Chinese Society, 121–38. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
56. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1924. “The Mother’s Brother in South Africa.” South African Journal of Science 21:1—24.
57. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1930. “The Social Organization of Australian Tribes.” Oceania 1:34-65.
58. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1935. “On the Concept of Function in Social Science.” American Anthropolo- 37:394-402.
59. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1940. “On Social Structure.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 70:1-12.
60. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1950. “Introduction.” In A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, ed., African Systems of Kinship and Marriage,. 1–85. New : Oxford University Press.
61. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1953. “Dravidian Kinship Terminology.” Man 53:112.
62. Rivers, W. H. R. 1910. “The Genealogical Method of Anthropological Inquiry.” The Sociological Review 3:1-12.
63. Sangren, P. Steven. 1980. ‘A Chinese Marketing Community: An Historical Ethnography of Ta-ch’i, Taiwan.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
64. Scheffler, H. W. 1963. “Choiseul Island Descent Groups.” Journal of the Polynesian Society 72:177-87.
65. Scheffler, H. W. 1966. ‘Ancestor Worship in Anthropology: Or, Observations on Descent and Descent Groups.” Current Anthropology 7:.541-551
66. Schneider, David M. 1965a. “Some Muddles in Models: Or, How the System Really Works.” In Michael Banton, ed., The Relevance of Models of Social Anthropology, 25–85. Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth Monograph, no 1. London: Tavistock.
67. Schneider, David M. 1965b. “Kinship and Biology.” In Ansley J. Coale et al., eds., Aspects of the Analysis of Family Structure, 83–101. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
68. Schneider, David M. 1969. “Kinship, Nationality, and Religion in American Culture: Toward a Definition of Kinship.” In Victor Turner, ed., Forms of Symbolic Action, 116–25. New Orleans: Tulane University, American Ethnological Society.
69. Schneider, David M. 1972. “What Is Kinship All About?” In Priscilla Reining, ed., Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year, 32–63. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington, D.C.
70. Silin, Robert H. 1976. Leadership and Values: The Organization of Large-Scale Taiwanese Enterprises. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, East Asian Research Center.
71. Skinner, G. William. 1958. Leadership and Power in the Chinese Community of Thailand. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
72. Skinner, G. William. 1964. “Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, Part I.” Journal of Asian Studies 24:3-43.
73. Skinner, G. William. 1977. “Introduction: Urban Social Structure in Ch’ing China.” In G. William Skinner, ed., The City in Late Imperial China, 521–53. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
74. Skinner, G. William. 1979. “Introduction.” In The Study of Chinese Society: Essays by Maurice Freedman, xi—xxiv. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
75. Strathern, Andrew. 1973. “Kinship, Descent and Locality: Some New Guinea Examples.” In Jack Goody, ed., The Character of Kinship, 21–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Sun Sen-yen. 1969. “Shen-ming-hui.” In T’ai-wan Min-shih Hsi-kuan Tiao-ch’a Pao-kao[Report on investigation of customs of Taiwan’s people], 605–92. Department of Justice [Ssu-fa Hsing-cheng Pu], Taipei, Republic of China.
77. Sung Lung-sheng. 1981. “Property and Family Division.” In Emily Martin Ahern and Hill Gates, eds., The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society, 361—396. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
78. Tuan Sheng-feng. 1969. “Chi-ssu-kung-yeh.” In Tai-wan Min-shih Hsi-kuan Tiao-ch’a Pao-kao[Report on investigation of customs of Taiwan’s people], 693–820. Department of Justice [Ssu-fa Hsing-cheng Pu], Taipei, Republic of China.
79. Twitchett, Denis. 1959. “The Fan Clan’s Charitable Estate, 1050 - 1760.” In David S. Nivison and Arthur F. Wright, eds., Confucianism in Action, 97–133. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
80. Watson, James L. 1982. “Chinese Kinship Reconsidered: Anthropological Perspectives on Historical Research.” China Quarterly (Dec.):589-622.
81. Watson, Rubie S. 1982. “The Creation of a Chinese Lineage: The Teng of Ha Tsuen, 1669 - 1751.” Modern Asian Studies 16:69-100.
82. Wolf, Arthur P. 1974. “Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors.” In Arthur P Wolf, ed., Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society, 131–182. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
83. Wolf, Arthur R., and Chieh-shan Huang. 1980. Marriage and Adoption in China 1845–1945. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
84. Worsley, Peter M. 1956. “The Kinship System of the Tallensi: A Reevaluation.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 86:37-75.
85. Yanagisako, Sylvia Junko. 1979. “Family and Household: The Analysis of Domestic Groups.” In Bernard Siegel, ed., Annual Review of Anthropology, 161–205. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews.