Visual Attention and Attribute Attendance in Multi-Attribute Choice Experiments

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 447-467

  Balcombe, Kelvin ^a   Fraser, Iain ^b,c   Mcsorley, Eugene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927178192     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: 10991255     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.2383     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aribarg A, Pieters R, Wedel M. 2010. Raising the BAR: bias adjustment of recognition tests in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research 47: 387-400.
2. Awh E, Armstrong KM, Moore T. 2006. Visual and oculo-motor selection: Links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 124-130.
3. Balcombe KG, Fraser IM, Di Faclo S. 2010. Traffic lights and food choice: a choice experiment examining the relationship between food labels and price. Food Policy 35: 211-220.
4. Balcombe KG, Burton M, Rigby D. 2011. Skew and attribute nonattendance within the Bayesian mixed logit model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62(3): 446-461.
5. Caplin A, Dean M. 2008. Economic insights from 'neuroeconomic' data. American Economic Review 98(2): 169-174.
6. Caplin A, Dean M, Martin D. 2011. Search and satisficing. American Economic Review 101(7): 2899-2922.
7. Chorus CG, Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. 2008. A random regret minimization model of travel choice. Transportation Research Part B 42(1): 1-18.
8. DellaVigna S. 2009. Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2): 315-372.
9. Deubel H, Schneider WX. 1996. Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 36: 1827-1837.
10. Ferrini S, Scarpa R. 2007. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: a Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 342-363.
11. Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J, Wasi N. 2010. The generalised multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Science 29(3): 393-421.
12. Findlay JM. 2009. Saccadic eye movement programming: sensory and attentional factors. Psychological Research 73: 127-135.
13. Franco-Watkins AM, Johnson JG. 2011a. Applying the decision moving window to risky choice: comparison of eye-tracking and mouse-tracing methods. Judgement and Decision Making 6(8): 740-749.
14. Franco-Watkins AM, Johnson JG. 2011b. Decision moving window: using interactive eye tracking to examine decision processes. Behavioral Research 43: 853-863.
15. Greene WH, Hensher DA. 2010. Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? An empirical assessment of alternative logit models. Transportation 37: 413-428.
16. Hensher DA. 2006. How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21: 861-878.
17. Hensher DA, Rose J, Greene WH. 2005. The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes. Transportation 32: 203-222.
18. Hess S, Rose J. 2012. Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models? Transportation 39(6): 1225-1239.
19. Kahneman D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 93(5): 1449-1475.
20. Knoepfle DT, Camerer CF, Wang JT. 2009. Studying learning in games using eye-tracking. Journal of the European Economic Association 7(2-3): 388-398.
21. Marley AAJ, Louviere JJ. 2005. Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best-worst choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 49: 464-480.
22. Marley AAJ, Flynn TN, Louviere JJ. 2008. Probabilistic models of set-dependent and attribute-level best-worst choice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 52: 281-296.
23. Matin E. 1974. Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin 81: 899-917.
24. McFadden D. 2001. Economic choices. American Economic Review 91(3): 351-378.
25. McFadden D, Train K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15(5): 447-470.
26. McSorley E, McCloy R. 2009. Saccadic eye movements as an index of perceptual decision-making. Experimental Brain Research 198: 513-520.
27. McSorley E, Walker R, Haggard P. 2009. The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition. Vision Research 49: 608-614.
28. National Statistics. 2007. Family Food in 2005-06. A National Statistics Publication by Defra, The Stationary Office, Norwich.
29. Rayner K. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62: 1457-1506.
30. Reutskaja E, Nagel R, Camerer CF, Rangel A. 2011. Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: an eye-tracking study. American Economic Review April: 900-926.
31. Savage SJ, Waldman DM. 2008. Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: a comparison of online and mail survey modes. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 351-371.
32. Scarpa R, Rose JM. 2008. Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52: 253-282.
33. Scarpa R, Thiene M, Hensher DA. 2010. Monitoring choice task attribute attendance in nonmarket valuation of multiple park management services: does it matter? Land Economics 86(4): 817-839.
34. Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Murphy RO, Hutzler F. 2011. Flashlight- recording information acquisition online. Computers in Human Behavior 27: 1771-1782.
35. Theeuwes J. 2010. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica 135: 77-99.
36. Train K, Sonnier G. 2005. Mixed logit with bounded distributions of partworths. In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental Resource Economics, Scarpa R, Alberini A (eds). Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht; 117-134.
37. Tversky A. 1972. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychological Review 79: 281-299.
38. Wang JT, Spezio M, Camerer CF. 2010. Pinnocchio's pupil: eye-tracking and pupil dilation to understand truth-telling and deception in sender-receiver games. American Economic Review 100(3): 984-1007.
39. Wedel M, Pieters R. 2007. A review of eye-tracking research in marketing. Review of Marketing Research 4: 123-147.