Condition-dependent ornaments, life histories, and the evolving architecture of resource-use

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 591-600

  Morehouse, Nathan I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ECOSYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC FITNESS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84927173469     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: 15577023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icu103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Blanckenhorn WU, Hosken DJ. 2003. Heritability of three condition surrogates in the yellow dung fly. Behav Ecol 14:612-8.
2. Bonduriansky R. 2007. The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 169:9-19.
3. Borgia G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum NA, editors. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press. p. 19-50.
4. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A. 2004a. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 271:771-83.
5. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A. 2004b. Heightened condition dependence is not a general feature of male eyespan in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae). J Evol Biol 17:1310-6.
6. Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A. 2006. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr Biol 16:R755-65.
7. de Jong G. 1993. Covariances between traits deriving from successive allocations of a resource. Funct Ecol 7:75-83.
8. de Jong G, van Noordwijk AJ. 1992. Acquisition and allocation of resources: genetic (co)variances, selection, and life histories. Am Nat 139:749-70.
9. Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Folarin A, Huberty A, Interlandi S, Kilham SS, McCauley E, Schulz KL, et al. 2000. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 408:578-80.
10. Fagan WF, Siemann E, Mitter C, Denno RF, Huberty AF, Woods HA, Elser JJ. 2002. Nitrogen in insects: implications for trophic complexity and species diversification. Am Nat 160:784-802.
11. Gosler AG, Harper D. 2000. Assessing the heritability of body condition in birds: a challenge exemplified by the great tit Parus major L. (Aves). Biol J Linn Soc 71:103-17.
12. Green AJ. 2001. Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82:1473-83.
13. Hill GE, Caron YI, Montgomerie R. 2002. Dietary carotenoids predict plumage coloration in wild house finches. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 269:111924.
14. Houle D, Kondrashov AS. 2001. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 269:97-104.
15. Jakob EM, Marshall SD, Uetz GW. 1996. Estimating fitness: A comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77:61-7.
16. Johnstone RA. 1995. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: Reviewing the evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 70:1-65.
17. Johnstone RA, Rands SA, Evans MR. 2009. Sexual selection and condition-dependence. J Evol Biol 22:2387-94.
18. Kaspari M, Yanoviak SP, Dudley R. 2008. On the biogeography of salt limitation: A study of ant communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17848-51.
19. Ketola T, Kotiaho JS. 2009. Inbreeding, energy use and condition. J Evol Biol 22:770-81.
20. Kokko H, Heubel K. 2008. Condition-dependence, genotypeby- environment interactions and the lek paradox. Genetica 134:55-62.
21. Kokko H, Jennions MD, Brooks R. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:43-66.
22. Kotiaho JS. 1999. Estimating fitness: comparison of body condition indices revisited. Oikos 87:399-400.
23. Lailvaux SP, Irschick DJ. 2006. A functional perspective on sexual selection: insights and future prospects. Anim Behav 72:263-73.
24. Law R. 1979. Optimal life histories under age-specific predation. Am Nat 114:399-417.
25. Lorch PD, Proulx SR, Rowe L, Day T. 2003. Conditiondependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol Ecol Res 5:867-81.
26. Morehouse NI, Nakazawa T, Booher CM, Jeyasingh PD, Hall MD. 2010. Sex in a material world: why the study of sexual reproduction and sex-specific traits should become more nutritionally-explicit. Oikos 119:766-78.
27. Moya-Laraño J, Macías-Ordóñez R, Blanckenhorn WU, Fernández-Montraveta C. 2008. Analysing body condition: Mass, volume or density? J Anim Ecol 77:1099-108.
28. Nur N, Hasson O. 1984. Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. J Theor Biol 110:275-97.
29. Olijnyk AM, Nelson WA. 2013. Positive phenotypic correlations among life-history traits remain in the absence of differential resource ingestion. Funct Ecol 27:165-72.
30. Peig J, Green AJ. 2010. The paradigm of body condition: A critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol 24:1323-32.
31. Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ. 1998. Nutrient transfer functions: The site of integration between feeding behaviour and nutritional physiology. Chemoecology 8:61-8.
32. Reznick D. 1985. Costs of reproduction: An evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257-67.
33. Reznick D, Nunney L, Tessier A. 2000. Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 15:421-5.
34. Robinson MR, Beckerman AP. 2013. Quantifying multivariate plasticity: genetic variation in resource acquisition drives plasticity in resource allocation to components of life history. Ecol Lett 16:281-90.
35. Roff DA. 2000. Trade-offs between growth and reproduction: an analysis of the quantitative genetic evidence. J Evol Biol 13:434-45.
36. Roff DA. 2002. Life history evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
37. Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ. 2007. The evolution of trade-offs: Where are we? J Evol Biol 20:433-47.
38. Rowe L, Houle D. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 263:1415-21.
39. Rowe L, Ludwig D, Schluter D. 1994. Time, condition, and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am Nat 143:698-772.
40. Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M. 2005. Insect-plant biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Scriber JM, Slansky F. 1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu Rev Entomol 26:183-211.
42. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372-8.
43. Sih A, Bell AM. 2008. Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes. In: Brockman HJ, Roper TJ, Naguib M, Wynne-Edwards KE, Barnard C, Mitani JC, editors. Advances in the study of behavior. Waltham, MA: Academic Press. p. 227-81.
44. Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D. 2012. The nature of nutrition: a unifying framework from animal adaptation to human obesity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45. Snell-Rood EC, Espeset A, Boser CJ, White WA, Smykalski R. 2014. Anthropogenic changes in sodium affect neural and muscle development in butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:10221-6.
46. Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
47. van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137-42.
48. White TCR. 1993. The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abundance of animals. New York: Springer-Verlag.
49. Williams GC. 1966. Natural selection costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687-90.