Entomological impact and social participation in dengue control: A cluster randomized trial in Fortaleza, Brazil

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 99-105

  Caprara, Andrea ^a   Lima, José Wellington De Oliveira ^a   Peixoto, Ana Carolina Rocha ^a   Motta, Cyntia Monteiro Vasconcelos ^a   Nobre, Joana Mary Soares ^a   Sommerfeld, Johannes ^b   Kroeger, Axel ^b,c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

^b WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^c LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brazil; Cluster randomized trial; Dengue; Intervention study; Social participation; Vector management

Indexed keywords

AEDES AEGYPTI; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; COMMUNITY CARE; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION; COMMUNITY WORKSHOP; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COVERING ELEVATED CONTAINER; DENGUE; DISEASE CARRIER; DISEASE CONTROL; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EMPOWERMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; IN HOUSE RUBBISH DISPOSAL WITHOUT LARVICIDING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LEADERSHIP; MOBILIZATION OF SCHOOLCHILDREN AND SENIOR INHABITANT; PROGRAM FEASIBILITY; PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; VECTOR CONTROL; AEDES; ANIMAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOUSING; MOSQUITO; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARASITOLOGY; PATHOGENICITY; ZOOLOGY;

AEDES AEGYPTI;

AEDES; ANIMALS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BRAZIL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DENGUE; DISEASE RESERVOIRS; ECOSYSTEM; ENTOMOLOGY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOUSING; HUMANS; INSECT VECTORS; MOSQUITO CONTROL; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION;

EID: 84927144337     PISSN: 00359203     EISSN: 18783503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/tru187     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. WHO. Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
2. Gubler DJ. The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral disease as public health problems. Arch Med Res 2002;33:330-342.
3. Santos SL, Augusto LGS. Multidimensional model for dengue control: a proposal based on social reproduction and risk situations [in Portuguese]. Physis 2011;21:177-96.
4. Guzman MG, Kouri G. Dengue haemorrhagic fever integral hypothesis: confirming observations, 1987-2007. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2008;102:522-3.
5. Teixeira MG, Costa MCN, Barreto F, Barreto ML. Dengue: twenty-five years since reemergence in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 2009;25:7-18.
6. Wilder-Smith A, Ooi EE, Vasudevan SG, Gubler DJ. Update on dengue: epidemiology, virus evolution, antiviral drugs, and vaccine development. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2010;12:157-64.
7. Timerman A, Nunes EP, Neto-Andrade JL et al. First panel on dengue fever update [in Portuguese]. Rev Panam Infectol 2009;11:44-51.
8. World Health Organization. Global Health Atlas. http://www.who.int/ globalatlas/DataQuery/default.asp [accessed 23 March 2011].
9. Health Secretary of Fortaleza-SIMDA. Dengue: cases by district of residence according to the onset of symptoms month, Fortaleza, 2008 [in Portuguese]. http://tc1.sms.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/simda/dengue/ mes?ano=2008&modo=bairro&classifinold=1&criterio=&evolucao= ®ional= [accessed 31 October 2014].
10. Ministry of Health. Brazil-Health Data. Dengue Cases in Brasil. Large Regions and Federal Unities, 1990 to 2013 [in Portuguese]. http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2014/julho/31/Dengueclassica- at---2013.pdf [accessed 30 October 2014].
11. IBGE. Population Census 2010 [in Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2010. http://www.ibge.gov.br/ home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/default.shtm [accessed 12 September 2012].
12. Lópes TMT, Cordero JLG, Estrada JGS. Cultural dimensions of dengue that help or hinder its prevention in Mexico [in Spanish]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2012:31:197-203.
13. Health Secretary of Ceara State. Bulletins [in Portuguese]. 2013. http://www.saude.ce.gov.br/index.php/boletins [accessed 30 December 2013].
14. Arunachalam N, Tyagi BK, SamuelMet al. Community-based control of Aedes aegypti by adoption of eco-health methods in Chennai City, India. Pathog Glob Health 2012:106:488-96.
15. Focks DA. A Reviewof Entomological Sampling Methods and Indicators for Dengue Vectors (TDR/IDE/Den/03.1). Geneva: Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR); 2003. http ://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/TDR_IDE_DEN_03.1.pdf [accessed 05 June 2014].
16. Bazzani R, Wiese M. Introduction. In: Charron D. Ecohealth Research in Practice. Ottawa: Springer; 2012. p. 33-7.
17. GIS software ArcView version 8.3 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA).
18. Gohn MG. Empowerment and community participation in social policies [in Portuguese]. Saude Soc 2004;13:20-31.
19. Draper K, Hewitt G, Rifkin S. Chasing the dragon: developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes. Soc Sci Med 2010:71:1102-9.
20. Streck DR. Popular Education and Participatory Research: The Construction of a Method [in Portuguese]. In: Streck D, Ghihhi G, Silveira FT, Pitano SC. Readings of Paulo Freire: Contributions to Contemporary Educational Debate. Brasília: Liber livro; 2010.
21. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretariat of Health Surveillance. Department of Epidemiological Surveillance. National Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Dengue Epidemics [in Portuguese]. Brasília: Federal District DF; 2009.
22. Brassolatti RC, Andrade CFS Evaluation of an educative intervention to prevent dengue [in Portuguese]. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2002;7:243-51.
23. Lima EC, Vilasbôas ALQ. Inter-sector social mobilization for dengue controlin Bahia State, Brazil [in Portuguese]. Cad Saúde Pública 2011;27:1507-19.