Causes of the India–Pakistan enduring rivalry

The India-Pakistan Conflict: An Enduring Rivalry

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-24

  Paul, T V ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927081748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511616112.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Maoz and Mor, Bound by Struggle: The Strategic Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002), 5.
2. Paul Diehl and Gary Goertz, War and Peace in International Rivalry (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001), 44, 48.
3. Paul F. Diehl (ed.), The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1998).
4. William R. Thompson, “Principal Rivalries,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (June 1995), 195-223.
5. Frank W. Wayman, “Rivalries: Recurrent Disputes and Explaining War,” in John Vasquez (ed.), What Do We Know about War? (Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000), 219-34.
6. Scott D. Bennett, “The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries,” American Political Science Review 93 (September 1999), 749-50.
7. Edward Azar, Paul Jureidini, and Ronald McLaurin, “Protracted Social Conflict: Theory and Practice in the Middle East,” Journal of Palestine Studies 29 (1978), 41–60.
8. Michael Brecher and Jonathan Wilkenfeld, A Study of Crisis (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), 6.
9. Patrick James, International Relations and Scientific Progress (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2002), 57-62.
10. John A. Vasquez, “Distinguishing Rivals that Go to War from Those that Do Not: A Quantitative Comparative Case Study of the Two Paths to War,” International Studies Quarterly 40 (December 1996), 531-58.
11. T. V. Paul, Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 20.
12. Andrew Mack, “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict,” World Politics 27 (January 1975), 175-200.
13. Ivan Arreguin-Toft, “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict,” International Security 26 (Summer 2001), 93-128.
14. Stanley Wolpert, A New History of India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 317.
15. Percival Spear, A History of India (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 1999), vol. 2, 226-29.
16. Wolpert, A New History of India, 324-49.
17. Victoria Schofield, India, Pakistan and the Unfinished War (London: I. B. Tauris, 2000).
18. Stephen Philip Cohen, The Idea of Pakistan (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004).
19. Sumantra Bose, Kashmir, Roots of Conflict, Paths to Peace (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003), 165, 168.
20. Kanti Bajpai, “Indian Strategic Culture,” in Michael R. Chambers (ed.), South Asia in 2020 (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US War College, 2002), 245-303.
21. Maya Chadda, Ethnicity, Security, and Separatism in India (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).
22. Harish Khare, “Kashmir: New Roadmap Taking Shape,” http://www.hinduonnet.com, November 18, 2004.
23. “Indian PM Rejects Kashmir Proposal,” BBC News, http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/40203, November 17, 2004.
24. Bose, Kashmir, Roots of Conflict, 165.
25. Paul K. Huth and Todd L. Allee, The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), ch. 4.
26. Owen Bennett Jones, Pakistan: Eye of the Storm (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), 277-78.
27. Sumit Ganguly, Conflict Unending: India-Pakistan Tensions since 1947 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001), 6-7.
28. Raju G. C. Thomas, Indian Security Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), 22-23.
29. Anthony H. Cordesman, The India-Pakistan Military Balance, (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2002), 3.
30. Strobe Talbott, Engaging India (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004), ch. 8.
31. Paul, Asymmetric Conflicts, ch. 6.
32. C. Raja Mohan, Crossing the Rubicon: The Shaping of India’s New Foreign Policy (New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2003), ch. 7.
33. Robert J. McMahon, Cold War in the Periphery: The United States, India and Pakistan (NewYork: Columbia University Press, 1994), 209-10.
34. Dennis Kux, The United States and Pakistan 1947-2000 (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2002).
35. Paul, Asymmetric Conflicts, 24-25.
36. Bargaining and Learning in Recurring Crises (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), 270.
37. Raju G. C. Thomas, “The South Asian Security Balance in a Western Dominant World,” in T. V. Paul, James J. Wirtz, and Michel Fortman (eds.), Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004), 317-18.
38. A. F. K. Organiski, World Politics, 2nd edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968), 364-66.
39. Inis L. Claude, Power and International Relations (NewYork: Random House, 1964), 56.
40. Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke (eds.), Parity and War (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).
41. Ashutosh Varshney, Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002).
42. Hasan-Askari Rizvi, “Pakistan’s Strategic Culture,” in Chambers (ed.), South Asia in 2020, 305-28
43. Baldev Raj Nayar and T. V. Paul, India in the World Order: Searching for Major Power Status (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
44. Stephen P. Cohen, India: Emerging Power (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2001).
45. Dinshaw Mistry, “A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment of India as an Emerging Power,” India Review 3 (January 2004), 64–87.
46. Jean-Luc Racine, “Pakistan and the ‘India Syndrome’: Between Kashmir and the Nuclear Predicament,” in Christophe Jaffrelot (ed.), Pakistan: Nationalism Without a Nation? (London: Zed Books, 2002), ch. 9.
47. T. V. Paul, “The Enduring Sino-Pakistani Nuclear/Missile Relationship and the Balance of Power Logic,” Nonproliferation Review 10 (Summer 2003), 1–9.
48. J. Mohan Malik, “South Asia in China’s Foreign Relations,” Pacifica Review 13 (February 2001), 73–90.
49. Babar Sattar, “Pakistan: Return to Praetorianism,” in Muttiah Alagappa (ed.), Coercion and Governance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001), 385-412.
50. Ayesha Jalal, The State of the Martial Law: The Origins of Pakistan’s Political Economy of Defense (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 295-328.
51. Diehl and Goertz, War and Peace in International Rivalry, 132.
52. Tony Armstrong, Breaking the Ice (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 1993).
53. Richard Ned Lebow, Between Peace and War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984).
54. Stephen Rock, Why Peace Breaks Out (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989).
55. I. William Zartman and Jeffrey Z. Rubin, “Symmetry and Asymmetry in Negotiations,” in Zartman and Rubin (eds.), Powerand Negotiations (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), 272.
56. Putnam, “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization 42 (Summer 1988), 427-60.