Why do political parties obey results of elections?

Democracy and the Rule of Law

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 114-144

  Przeworski, Adam ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927080295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610066.006     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Almond, Gabriel A., and Sydney Verba. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston: Little, Brown.
2. Alvarez, Mike, José Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limongi, and Adam Przeworski. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Journal of International Comparative Development 31: 3-36.
3. Barry, Brian. 1978. Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bobbio, Norberto. 1984. The Future of Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Bryce, James. 1921. Modern Democracies. London.
6. Buchanan, James, and Gordon Tulfock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Calvert, Randall. 1994. “Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions.” In J. Knight and I. Sened (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Calvert, Randall. 1995. “The Rational Choice Theory of Social Institutions: Cooperation, Coordination, and Communication.” In Jeffrey S. Banks and Eric A. Hanushek (eds.), Modern Political Economy, 216-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cohen, Joshua. 1998. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Jon Elster (ed.), Democratic Deliberation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Collini, Stefan, Donald Winch, and John Burrow. 1983. That Noble Science of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Condorcet. 1986. “Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues a la pluralite des voix.” In Sur les elections et autres textes. Ed. Olivier de Bernon. Paris: Fayard.
12. Cortés, Fernando. 1997. La distribución del ingreso en Mexico en epocas de estabi- lización y reforma económica. Guadalajara, Mexico: CIESAS.
13. Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Deininger, K., and L. Squire. 1996. “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality.” World Bank Economic Review 10: 565-91.
16. Dunn, John. 1992. Conclusion to John Dunn (ed.), Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 239-66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Dunn, John. 1996.The History of Political Theory and Other Essays.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Eckstein, Harry. 1961. A Theory of Stable Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Center for International Studies.
19. Eckstein, Harry, and Ted R. Gurr. 1975. Patterns of Inquiry: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
20. Eickelman, Dale F., and James Piscatori. 1996. Muslim Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Eisenstadt, S. N. 1968. “The Protestant Ethic Theses in the Framework of Sociological Theory and Weber’s Work.” In S. N. Eisenstadt (ed.), The Protestant Ethic and Modernization: A Comparative View, 3-45. New York: Basic Books.
22. Esposito, John L., and John O. Voll. 1996. Islam and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. “The Primacy of Culture.” Journal of Democracy 6: 7-14.
24. Gellner, Ernest. 1991. “Civil Society in Historical Context.” International Social Science Journal 129: 495-510.
25. Gerth, H. H., and C. Wright Mills (eds.). 1958. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Gibson, James L., Raymond M. Duch, and Kent L. Tedin. 1992. “Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union.” Journal of Politics 54: 329-71.
27. Granato, Jim, Ronald Inglehart, and David Leblang. 1996. “Cultural Values, Stable Democracy, and Economic Development: A Reply.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 680-96.
28. Hampton, Jean. 1994. “Democracy and the Rule of Law.” In Ian Shapiro (ed.), The Rule of Law, 13-45. Nomos XXXVI. New York: New York University Press.
29. Hardin, Russell. 1989. “Why a Constitution?” In Bernard Grofman and Donald Witman (eds.), The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, 100-20. New York: Agathon Press.
30. Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger (eds.). 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Holmes, Stephen. 1997. “In Search of New Enemies.” London Review of Books, 24 April.
32. Huntington, Samuel P. 1993a. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs 72, 3: 22-49.
33. Huntington, Samuel P. 1993b. “Democracy’s Third Wave.” In Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner (eds.), The Global Resurgence of Democracy, 3-25. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34. Im, Huyg Baeg. 1997. “The Compatibility of Confucianism and Democratic Civil Society in Korea.” Paper presented at the IPSA XVII World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 17-21 August.
35. Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. Jackman, Robert W., and Ross A. Miller. 1996. “A Renaissance of Political Culture?” American Journal of Political Science 40: 632-59.
37. Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
38. Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1997. “Religion and Democratization: Belgium and Algeria.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 28-31 August.
39. Kelsen, Hans. 1988. La démocratie. Sa nature-sa valeur. Paris: Economica.
40. Kornhauser, Lewis A. 1999. “The Normativity of Law.” American Law and Economics Review 6: 3-25.
41. Laitin, David. 1995. “National Revivals and Violence.” Archives Europeénnes de Sociologie 36: 3-43.
42. Laswell, Harold D. 1946. Power and Personality. New York.
43. Lee Teng Hui. 1997. Paper presented at the IPSA XVII World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 17-21 August.
44. Lewis, Bernard. 1993. “Islam and Liberal Democracy.” Atlantic Monthly 271, 2: 89-98.
45. Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
46. Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53: 69-105.
47. Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Man. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
48. Lipset, Seymour M. 1994 “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited.” American Sociological Review 59: 1-21.
49. Manin, Bernard. 1997. Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Mazrui, AliA. 1997. “Islamic and Western Values.” Foreign Affairs 76, 5: 118-32.
51. Milanovic, Branko. 1999. “Do More Unequal Countries Redistribute More? Does the Median Voter Hypothesis Hold?” World Bank, Washington, D.C. Unpublished manuscript.
52. Mill, John Stuart. 1991. Considerations on Representative Government. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
53. Montesquieu. 1993. Lettres persanes. Paris: Bookking International.
54. Montesquieu. 1995. De l’esprit des lois. Paris: Gallimard.
55. Muller, Edward N., and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1994. “Civil Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships.” American Political Science Review 88: 635-52.
56. Nathan, Andrew J., and Tianjian Shi. 1993. “Cultural Requisites for Democacy in China: Findings from a Survey.” Deadalus 122: 95-123.
57. Neubauer, Deane E. 1967. “Some Conditions of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 61: 1002-9.
58. OECD. 1995. La distribution des revenues dans les pays de l’OCDE. Paris: OECD.
59. Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Przeworski, Adam. 2002. “Why Democracy Survives in Affluent Countries.” Department of Politics, New York University. Unpublished manuscript.
61. Przeworski, Adam, Mike Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Przeworski, Adam, José Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 1998. “Culture and Democracy.” In World Culture Report, 125-46. Paris: UNESCO.
63. Rawls, John. 1993. “The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus.” In David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John E. Roemer (eds.), The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1985. The Government of Poland. Indianapolis: Hackett.
65. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1960. Critique de la raison dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.
66. Schmitt, Karl. 1988. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
67. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
68. Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
69. Sen, Amartya. 1997. “Culture and Development: Global Perspectives and Constructive Criticism.” Paper prepared for UNESCO’s Office of the World Culture Report. Paris.
70. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1961. De la democratie en Amérique. Paris: Gallimard.
71. Versini, Laurent. 1995. Introduction to Montesquieu, De l’esprit des lois, 9-64. Paris: Gallimard.
72. Weber, Max. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
73. Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91: 245-63.
74. Wiarda, Howard J. 1981. Corporatism and National Development in Latin America. Boulder: Westview.
75. Wiarda, Howard J. 1989. “The Dominican Republic: Mirror Legacies of Democracy and Authoritarianism.” In Larry Diamond, Juan J. Linz and Seymour Martin Lipset (eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, 423-58. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
76. Wiatr, Jerzy J. 1979. “The Civic Culture from a Marxist Sociological Perspective.” In Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba (eds.), The Civic Culture Revisited, 103-23. Boston: Little, Brown.
77. Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.