Linkage of tradable permit systems in international climate policy architecture

Post-Kyoto International Climate Policy: Implementing Architectures for Agreement: Research from the Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 119-150

  Jaffe, Judson ^a   Stavins, Robert N ^b  

^a ANALYSIS GROUP   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927073341     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813207.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. ABC News (2008). “Japan PM Announces Plan to Cut Emissions,” June 9, available at www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/09/2269404.htm.
2. Australian Government (2008). “Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Green Paper,” Department of Climate Change, Canberra, July.
3. Baron, Richard and Stephen Bygrave (2002). “Towards International Emissions Trading: Design Implications for Linkages,” COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2002)5, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Energy Agency.
4. Baron, Richard and Cédric Philibert (2005). Act Locally, Trade Globally: Emissions Trading for Climate Policy. Paris: OECD and IEA.
5. Blyth, William and Martina Bosi (2004). “Linking Non-EU Domestic Emissions Trading Schemes with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme,” COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2004)6, Paris: OECD and IEA.
6. Bradsher, Keith (2007). “Clean Power That Reaps a Whirlwind,” New York Times, May 9.
7. California Air Resources Board (2008). “Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change,” October.
8. Carbonpositive (2008). “CER Market Steadies After Price Hit,” November 10.
9. Carraro, Carlo (2007). “Incentives and Institutions: A Bottom-Up Approach to Climate Policy,” in Joe A. Aldy and Robert N. Stavins (eds.), Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.161–72.
10. Edenhofer, Ottmar, Christian Flachsland, and Robert Marschinski (2007). “Towards a Global CO2 Market: An Economic Analysis,” Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
11. Ellis, Jane and Dennis Tirpak (2006). “Linking GHG Emission Trading Schemes and Markets,” COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2006)6, Paris: OECD and IEA.
12. Environment Canada (2008). “Turning the Corner: Regulatory Framework for Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” available at www.ec.gc.ca/doc/virage-corner/2008-03/pdf/541_eng.pdf.
13. Euractiv.com (2007). “Norway to Join EU Carbon-Trading Scheme,” March 9.
14. European Commission (2004). Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s Project Mechanisms, Official Journal of the European Union, L 338/18 L 338/23, November 13.
15. European Commission (2005). EU Action Against Climate Change: EU Emissions Trading—An Open Scheme Promoting Global Innovation, Brussels.
16. European Commission (2007a). Commission Decision of August 31, 2007 Concerning the National Allocation Plan for the Allocation of Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowances Notified by Denmark in Accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Brussels.
17. European Commission (2007b). Emissions Trading: EU Wide Cap for 2008 2012 Set at 2.08 Billion Allowances after Assessment of National Plans for Bulgaria, Brussels, October 26.
18. European Commission (2008). Questions and Answers on the Revised EU Emissions Trading System, Brussels, December 17.
19. Flachsland, Christian, Ottmar Edenhofer, Michael Jakob, and Jan Steckel (2008). “Developing the International carbon Market: Linking Options for the EU ETS,” Report to the Policy Planning Staff in the Federal Foreign Office, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
20. Hahn, Robert W. (1984). “Market Power and Transferable Property Rights,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(4): 753–65.
21. Hahn, Robert W. (1998). The Economics and Politics of Climate Change. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.
22. Haites, Erik and Fiona Mullins (2001). “Linking Domestic and Industry Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Systems,” Toronto: Margaree Consultants Inc.
23. Helm, Carsten (2003). “International Emissions Trading with Endogenous Allowance Choices,” Journal of Public Economics 87(12): 2737–47.
24. Holtsmark, Bjart J. and Dag Einar Sommervoll (2008). “International Emissions Trading in a Non-cooperative Equilibrium,” Discussion Paper No. 542, Statistics Norway, Research Department, May.
25. Houser, Trevor, Rob Bradley, Britt Childs, Jacob Werksman, and Robert Heilmayr (2008). Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and US Climate Policy Design. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
26. Jaffe, Judson and Robert Stavins (2007). “Linking Tradable Permit Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Opportunities, Implications, and Challenges,” IETA Report on Linking GHG Emissions Trading Systems, prepared for the International Emissions Trading Association, November.
27. Japanese Ministry of the Environment (2006). FY 2004 Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Japan, Tokyo, May 25.
28. Kruger, Joseph, Wallace Oates, and William Pizer (2007). “Decentralization in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Lessons for Global Policy,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(1): 112–33.
29. McKibbin, Warwick J. and Peter J. Wilcoxen (2007). “A Credible Foundation for Long-Term International Cooperation on Climate Change,” in Aldy and Stavins (eds.), pp. 185–208.
30. Michaelowa, Axel and Frank Jotzo (2005). “Transaction Costs, Institutional Rigidities and the Size of the Clean Development Mechanism,” Energy Policy 33(4): 511–23.
31. Murray, Brian C., Richard G. Newell, and William A. Pizer (2009). “Balancing Cost and Emissions Certainty: An Allowance Reserve for Cap-and-Trade,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3, Issue 1, Winter, forthcoming.
32. Nigoff, Mindy (2006). “Clean Development Mechanism: Does the Current Structure Facilitate Kyoto Protocol Compliance?” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 18(2): 249–76.
33. Norwegian Ministry of the Environment (2005). Norway’s Report on Demonstrable Progress under the Kyoto Protocol: Status Report as of December 2005, Oslo.
34. Pointcarbon.com. (2007). JI Update: 12 Projects Submitted to UN in October, November 1.
35. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) (2007a). Model Rule, January 5, 2007 version.
36. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) (2007b). IPM Energy Modeling Documents.
37. Stavins, Robert N. (1995). “Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 133–48.
38. Stavins, Robert N. (2008). “A Meaningful U.S. Cap-and-Trade System to Address Climate Change,” Harvard Environmental Law Review 32(2): 293–371.
39. Sudo, Tomonori (2006). “Japanese Voluntary Emissions Trading Scheme (JVETS)—Overview and Analysis,” Presentation at the US-Japan Workshop on Climate Actions and Co-Benefit, March 22–23.
40. Summers, Lawrence (2007). “Foreword,” in Aldy and Stavins (eds.), pp. xviii–xxvii.
41. Tatsutani, Marika and William A. Pizer (2008). “Managing Costs in a U.S. Greenhouse Gas Trading Program: A Workshop Summary,” Discussion Paper 08–23, Washington DC: Resources For the Future.
42. United Nations (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Annex 1 of the Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, June 3–14.
43. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Risoe Centre (2008). Status of JI Projects, available at www.cdmpipeline.org/ji-projects.htm#1. Accessed August 21, 2008.
44. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2008). Expected Average Annual CERs from Registered Projects by Host Country, August 18.
45. Victor, David, Joshua House, and Sarah Joy (2005). “A Madisonian Approach to Climate Policy, Science 309(5742): 1820–1.