Sectoral approaches to a post-kyoto international climate policy framework

Post-Kyoto International Climate Policy: Implementing Architectures for Agreement: Research from the Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 201-239

  Sawa, Akihiro ^a  

^a 21st Century Public Policy Research Institute Keidanren   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927065419     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813207.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Aldy, Joseph E., John Ashton, Richard Baron, Daniel Bodansky, Steve Charnovitz, Elliot Diringer, Thomas C. Heller, Jonathan Pershing, P. R. Shukla, Laurence Tubiana, Fernando Tudela, and Xueman Wang (2003). Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
2. Aldy, Joseph, Scott Barrett, and Robert N. Stavins (2003). “Thirteen Plus One: A Comparison of Global Climate Policy Architectures,” Working Paper No. RWP03-012, Cambridge, MA.: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
3. Baron, Richard (2006). “Sectoral Approaches to GHG Mitigation: Scenarios for Integration,” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2006)8, Paris: OECD/IEA.
4. Baron, Richard and Jane Ellis (2006). “Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Institutional and Operational Issues,” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2006)4, Paris: OECD/IEA.
5. Baron, Richard, Jullia Reinaud, Matt Genasci, and Cedric Philibert (2007). Sectoral Approaches to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Exploring Issues for Heavy Industry. Paris: OECD/IEA.
6. Barrett, Scott (2003). Environment & Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Barrett, Scott (2007). “Proposal for a New Climate Change Treaty System,” The Economists’ Voice: 4(3), available at: www.bepress.com/ev/vol4/iss3/art6.
8. BASIC Project (2006). “The Sao Paulo Proposal for an Agreement on Future International Climate Policy,” Discussion Paper for COP12 and COP-MOP2, Nairobi, Kenya, available at www.basic-project.net/data/SP_prop_rev_nairobi.pdf.
9. Baumert, Kevin A. and Donald M. Goldberg (2006). “Action Targets: A New Approach to International Greenhouse Gas Controls,” Climate Policy: 5: 567–81.
10. Berk, M. M, M. G. J. den Elzen, and Gupta, J. (2005). “Bottom Up Climate Mitigation Policies and the Linkages with Non-Climate Policy Areas” in M. T. J. Kok and H. C. de Coninck (eds.), Beyond Climate: Options for broadening climate policy. Netherlands, RIVM report 500019001/2004 and NRP-CC report 500036/01, pp. 201–20.
11. Bodansky, Daniel (2003). “Climate Commitments: Assessing the Options,” in Aldy, Ashton, Baron, Bodansky, Charnovitz, Diringer, Heller, Pershing, Shukla, Tubiana, Tudela and Wang, pp. 37–60.
12. Bodansky, Daniel (2007). International Sectoral Agreements in a Post-2012 Climate Framework. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
13. Bodansky, Daniel, Sophie Chou, and Christie Jorge-Tresolini (2004). International Climate Efforts beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
14. Bosi, Martina and Jane Ellis (2005). “Exploring Options for ‘Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms,’” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)1, Paris: OECD/IEA.
15. Bradley, Rob and Kevin A. Baumert, eds. (2005). Growing in the Greenhouse: Protecting the Climate by Putting Development First. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
16. Bradley, Rob, Kevin A. Baumert, Britt Childs, Tim Herzog, and Jonathan Pershing (2007). Slicing the Pie: Sector-Based Approaches to International Climate Arrangements, Issues and Options. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
17. Cosbey, Aaron and Richard Tarasofsky (2007). “Climate Change, Competitiveness and Trade,” Chatham House Report, London: Chatham House.
18. De Coninck, Heleen, Carolyn Fischer, Richard G. Newell, and Takahiko Ueno (2007). “International Technology–Oriented Agreements to Address Climate Change.” Discussion Paper 6-50, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
19. De Muizon, Gildas and Matthieu Glachant (2004). “The UK Climate Change Levy Agreements: Combining Negotiated Agreements with Tax and Emission Trading,” in Baranzini, Andrea and Philippe Thalman (eds.), Voluntary Approaches in Climate Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
20. Egenhofer, Christian and Noriko Fujiwara (2008). Global Sectoral Industry Approaches to Climate Change: The Way Forward. CEPS Task Force Reports, Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies.
21. Ellerman, A. Denny and Ian Sue Wing (2003). Absolute vs. Intensity-Based Emission Caps. Report No.100, Cambridge, MA: MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.
22. Ellis, Jane (2006). “Issues Related to Implementing ‘Programmatic CDM’.” Draft Paper prepared for the OECD/IEA Project for the Annex 1 Expert Group on the UNFCCC (AIXG), Paris: OECD/IEA.
23. Ellis, Jane and Richard Baron (2005). “Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms: An Initial Assessment of Electricity and Aluminium,” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT (2005) 8. Paris: OECD/IEA.
24. Ellis, Jane, Richard Baron, and Barbara Buchner (2007). “SD-PAMs: What, Where, When and How?” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2007)5, Paris: OECD/IEA.
25. Government of Japan (2008). “Views Regarding the Work Programme of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention,” available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/awglca1/eng/misc01a01.pdf.
26. Groenenberg, Heleen, Dian Phylipsen, and Kornelis Blok (2001). “Differentiating Commitments World Wide: Global Differentiation of GHG emissions Reductions Based on the Triptych Approach-A Preliminary Assessment,” Energy Policy, 29:1007–30.
27. Heller, Thomas C. and P.R. Shukra (2002). “Development and Climate: Engaging Developing Countries,” in Aldy, Ashton, Baron, Bodansky, Charnovitz, Diringer, Heller, Pershing, Shukla, Tubiana, Tudela and Wang, pp. 111–40.
28. Herzog, Timothy, Kevin A. Baumert, and Jonathan Pershing (2006). Target: Intensity; an Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Intensity Targets. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
29. IEA (2008). Energy Technology Perspectives 2008. Paris: IEA.
30. IEA (2008a). Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency: Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis. Paris: IEA.
31. IPCC (2007). “Summary for Policymakers,” in Metz, B., O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, L. A. Meyer (eds.), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. JAMA (2008). JAMA Proposal for the Establishment of an Asia-Pacific Partnership Road Transport Sector Task Force. Tokyo, Japan: Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc.
33. Jansen, J. C., J. J. Battjes, J. P. M. Sijm, C. H. Volkers, and J. R. Ybema (2001). “The Multi-Sector Convergence Approach: A Flexible Framework for Global Rules for National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation Targets,” ECN-C-01-007/CICERO. Working Paper 2001:4. Petten, Amsterdam: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, and Oslo, Norway: Center for International Climate and Environment Research, Oslo.
34. Jotzo, Frank and John C. V. Pezzey (2005). “Optimal Intensity Targets for Emissions Trading under Uncertainty,” Economics and Environment Network Working Paper EEN0504, Canberra: Australian National University.
35. Justus, Debra and Cedric Philibert (2005). “International Energy Technology Collaboration and Climate Change Mitigation Synthesis Report,” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)11, Paris: OECD/IEA.
36. Kolstad, Charles D. (2005). “The Simple Analytics of Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity Reduction Targets,” Energy Policy, 33: 2231–6.
37. Kulovesi, Kati and Katja Keinanen (2006). “Long-term Climate Policy: International Legal Aspects of a Sector-Based Approach,” Climate Policy, 6: 313–325.
38. Lewis, Joanna and Elliot Diringer (2007). Policy-Based Commitments in a Post-2012 Climate Framework. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
39. METI (2004). “Sustainable Future Framework on Climate Change, Interim Report, Global Environmental Sub-Committee Industrial Structure Council,” Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry of Government of Japan, available at: www.meti.go.jp/english/information/data/c Framework2004e.pdf.
40. Neuhoff, Karsten and Susanne Droege (2007). “International Strategies to Address Competitiveness Concerns,” Working Paper July 6, Cambridge: Electricity Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge.
41. OECD (2008). Policy Instruments to Address Climate Change, OECD Preliminary Report, March, Paris: OECD.
42. Okazaki, Teruo (2008). Presentation at the International Workshop on Sectoral Approach by the Government of Japan, Paris.
43. Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2005). International Climate Efforts beyond 2012: Report of the Climate Dialogue at Pocantico. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
44. Philibert, Cedric (2000). “How Could Emissions Trading Benefit Developing Countries,” Energy Policy, 28: 947–56.
45. Philibert, Cedric (2005). “Approaches for Future International Co-operation,” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)6, Paris: OECD/IEA.
46. Philibert, Cedric (2005a). “New Commitment Options: Compatibility with Emissions Trading,” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)9, Paris: OECD/IEA.
47. Philibert, Cedric (2005b). “Climate Mitigation: Integrating Approaches for Future International Cooperation,” OECD/IEA information paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)10, Paris: OECD/IEA.
48. Philibert, Cedric and Jonathan Pershing (2001). “Considering the Options: Climate Targets for all Countries,” Climate Policy, 1: 211–27.
49. Samaniego, Joseluis and Christiana Figueres (2002). “A Sector Based Clean Development” in Baumert et al. (eds.), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
50. Sawa, Akihiro (2007). “Proposal for a Post-Kyoto Framework,” Interim Report of the research project Japan’s Strategy and International Cooperation for a Post-Kyoto Framework, Tokyo: The 21st Century Public Policy Institute, available at: www.21ppi.org/english/pdf/071112.pdf.
51. Sawa, Akihiro (2008). “Sectoral Approaches as a Post-Kyoto Framework: A Proposal of Japan’s Sectoral Approach” Tokyo: The 21st Century Public Policy Institute, available at: www.21ppi.org/english/pdf/080321.pdf.
52. Schmidt, Jake and Ned Helme (2005). Operational Issues for a Sector- Based Approach: Questions and Answers. Washington DC: Center for Clean Air Policy.
53. Schmidt, Jake, Ned Helme, Jin Lee, and Mark Houdashelt (2006). Sector- Based Approach to the Post-2012 Climate Change Policy Architecture. Washington DC: Center for Clean Air Policy.
54. Siikavirta, Hanne (2006). “Long-term Climate Policy: Sectoral Approaches and Proposals,” Ministry of the Environment, Finland, available at: www.environment.fi/download.asp?contentid=59527&lan=en.
55. Sugiyama, Taishi and Jonathan Sinton (2005). Orchestra of Treaties, Tokyo: Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry.
56. Watson, Clinton, John Newman, Rt Hon Simon Upton, and Petra Hackmann (2005). “Can Transnational Sectoral Agreements Help Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions?,” SG/SD/RT(2005)1, Document Prepared for the Round Table on Sustainable Development, Paris: OECD.
57. Winkler, Harald, Mark Howells, and Kevin A. Baumert (2007). “Sustainable Development Policies and Measures: Institutional Issues and Electrical Efficiency in South Africa,” Climate Policy, 7: 212–29.