Sectoral systems of innovation and varieties of capitalism: Explaining the development of high-technology entrepreneurship in Europe

Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 348-387

  Casper, Steven ^a   Soskice, David ^b  

^a KECK GRADUATE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927056085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493270.011     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Adelberger, K. E. (2000), Semi-sovereign leadership? The state’s role in German biotechnology and venture capital growth, German Politics, 9, 103–122
2. Audretsch, D. B. (1985), The Innovation, Unemployment, and Competitiveness Challenge in Germany, Discussion Paper FS IV 85–6, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin
3. Bank of England (1996), The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, Bank of England, London
4. Becker, S., W. Menz and T. Sablowski (1999), In netz gegangen: industrielle beziehungen im netzwerk-konzern am beispiel der Hoechst AG, Industrielle Beziehungen, 6, 9–35
5. Breschi, S., and F. Malerba (1997), Sectoral systems of innovation: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries, in C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Frances Pinter, London, 130–155
6. Büchtemann, C. F., and K. Vogler-Ludwig (1997), Das deutsche Ausbildungsmodell unter Anpassungszwang: Thesen zur Humankapitalbildung in Deutschland, Ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Munich
7. Casper, S. (2000), Institutional adaptiveness, technology policy, and the diffusion of new business models: the case of German biotechnology, Organization Studies, 21, 887–914
8. Casper, S. (2001), The legal framework for corporate governance: the influence of contract law on company strategies in Germany and the United States, in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism – The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 387–416
9. Casper, S. (2003), The German Internet economy and the “SiliconValley model”: convergence, divergence, or something else? in B. Kogut (ed.), The Global Internet Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 223–262
10. Casper, S., and H. Glimstedt (2001), Economic organization, innovation systems, and the Internet, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17, 265–281
11. Casper, S., and H. Kettler (2001), National institutional frameworks and the hybridization of entrepreneurial business models: the German and UK biotechnology sectors, Industry and Innovation, 8, 5–30
12. Casper, S., M. Lehrer and D. Soskice (1999), Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries, Industry and Innovation, 6, 6–23
13. Casper, S., and C. Matraves (2003), Institutional frameworks and innovation in the German and UK pharmaceutical industry, Research Institutional Frameworks and Innovation Policy, 32, 1865–1879
14. Charkham, J. (1995), Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford
15. Cooke, P. (1999), Biotechnology Clusters in the UK: Lessons from Localisation in the Commercialisation of Science, working paper, Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University
16. Deutsche Bundesbank (1997), Monthly Report, April
17. Easterbrook, F., and D. Fischel (1991), The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
18. Edwards, J., and K. Fischer (1994), Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Ernst and Young (1998), New Directions 1998 – 12thBiotechnology Industry Annual Report, Ernst & Young LLP, Palo Alto, CA
20. Ernst and Young (1999), Biotech 99: Bridging the Gap – 13thBiotechnology Industry Annual Report, Ernst & Young LLP, Palo Alto, CA
21. German Venture Capital Association (1999), Venture Capital in Europe 1998, special report, German Venture Capital Association, Berlin
22. Glimstedt, H. (2001), Competitive dynamics of technological standardization: the case of third-generation cellular communications, Industry and Innovation, 8, 49–78
23. Glimstedt, H., and U. Zander (2003), Sweden’s wireless wonders: defining the Swedish Internet economy, in B. Kogut (ed.), The Global Internet Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 109–152
24. Hall, P. A., and D. Soskice (2001), Introduction, in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism – The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–70
25. Hollingsworth, R. (1997), Continuities and changes in social systems of production: the cases of Germany, Japan, and the United States, in R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 265–310
26. Katzenstein, P. (1987), Policy and Politics in West Germany: Towards the Growth of a Semi-Sovereign State, Temple University Press, Philadelphia
27. Katzenstein, P. (1989), Stability and change in the emerging third republic, in P. Katzenstein (ed.), Industry and Politics in West Germany, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
28. Keller, B. (1991), Einführung in die Arbeitspolitik, Oldenbourg, Munich
29. Kogut, B. (2003), Introduction: the Internet has borders, in B. Kogut (ed.), The Global Internet Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1–39
30. Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo (1993), Technological regimes and firm behavior, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 1, 45–74
31. Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo (1997), Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 1, 83–117
32. McKinsey & Company (1998), U.S. Venture Capital – Industry Overview and Economics, McKinsey & Company, New York
33. Mietsch, A. (1999), Bio-Technologie Das Jahr- und Adressbuch 1999, Biocom, Berlin
34. Miller, G. (1992), Managerial Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Mowery, D. C., and R. R. Nelson (eds.) (1999), Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
36. Penan, H. (1996), R&D strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer’s disease therapeutic strategies, Research Policy, 25, 3, 337–358
37. Perrow, C. (1985), Normal Accidents, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
38. Roe, M. (1994), Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
39. Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
40. Schwartz, A. (1992), Relational contracts and the courts, Journal of Legal Studies 21, 780–822
41. Science Watch (1992), A ranking of university institutes by citation impact – current contents: life sciences, molecular biology/genetics subsection, Institute of Scientific Information, Philadelphia
42. S G Cowen (1999), Biotechnology quarterly, S G Cowen Perspectives, January
43. Shapiro, C., and H. Varian (1999), Information Rules, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Soskice, D. (1997), German technology policy, innovation, and national institutional frameworks, Industry and Innovation, 4, 75–96
45. Streeck, W. (1984), Industrial Relations in West Germany: A Case Study of the Car Industry, St Martin’s Press, New York
46. Technologie-Beteiligungs-Gesellschaft (2001), Sectoral Distribution of Public Venture Capital, http://www.tbgbonn.de/info/index.html
47. Teece, D. (1986), Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy, Research Policy, 15, 6, 285–305
48. Tylecote, A., and E. Conesa (1999), Corporate governance, innovation systems, and industrial policy, Industry and Innovation, 6, 25–50
49. Vitols, S. (2001), Varieties of corporate governance: comparing Germany and the UK, in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism – The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 337–369
50. Wellcome Trust (1998), Mapping the Landscape: National Biomedical Research Outputs, 1988–95, Policy Report no. 9, Wellcome Trust, London
51. Wistschaftswoche (1998), Schneller Aufstieg, September 24, 134–139
52. Woodward, J. (1965), Industrial Organization, Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford
53. Zucker, L., and M. Darby (1999), Star scientist linkages to firms in APEC and European countries: indicators of regional institutional differences affecting competitive advantage, International Journal of Biotechnology, 1, 1, 119–131