Constitutional adjudication in Europe and the United States: Paradoxes and contrasts

European and US Constitutionalism

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 197-259

  Rosenfeld, Michel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927023585     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493904.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Louis Favoreu, ‘Constitutional Review in Europe’, in Louis Henkin and Albert J. Rosenthal (eds.), Constitutionalism and Rights: the Influence of the U.S. Constitution Abroad (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), p. 38.
2. John Bell, French Constitutional Law (Oxford/England and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 32-3.
3. Alec Stone Sweet, The Birth of Judicial Politics in France (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 48.
4. Dominique Rousseau, ‘The Constitutional Judge: Master or Slave of the Constitution?’, in Michel Rosenfeld (ed.), Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference and Legitimacy: Theoretical Perspectives (Durham: Duke University Press, 1994)
5. Robert Bork, The Tempting of America: the Political Seduction of the Law (New York: Touchstone Books, 1990).
6. Mark Tushnet, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).
7. Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).
8. R. C. Van Caenegem, Judges, Legislators and Professors (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 138-9, 151-3.
9. Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State (Anders Wedberg, trans., New York: Russel and Russel, 1961), p. 268.
10. Michel Rosenfeld, Affirmative Action and Justice; a Philosophical and Constitutional Inquiry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991), pp. 163-215.
11. Ronald Dworkin, ‘The Model of Rules’ (1967) 35 University of Chicago Law Review, 14.
12. Michel Rosenfeld, Just Interpretations: Law Between Ethics and Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 74-83.
13. Edwin Meese, ‘The Law of the Constitution’ (1987) 61 Tulsa Law Review, 979
14. Tushnet, Taki ng the Constitution Away, above, note 9.
15. Ulrich Karpen, ‘Rule of Law’ in Ulrich Karpen (ed.), The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany (Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag-Ges, 1988), pp. 169, 173
16. Bernhard Schlink, ‘German Constitutional Culture in Transition’, in Rosenfeld, Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference and Legitimacy, above, note 5, p. 197
17. Ludger Helms, Institutions and Institutional Change in the Federal Republic of Germany (New York: Palgrave, 2000), pp. 87, 95.
18. Donald P. Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (2nd edn, Durham: Duke University Press, 1997), pp. 482-3.
19. Kommers, Constitutional Jurisprudence, above, note 31, at p. 483.
20. Jacques Chevallier, L’Etat de droit (3rd edn, Paris 1999), p. 11
21. Michel Rosenfeld, ‘The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy’ (2001) 74 Southern Californian Law Review, 1330 (explaining that Etat légal may be roughly translated as ‘democratic state rule through law’).
22. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract (Charles Frankel, ed., New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1947) pp. 14-18.
23. Rosenfeld, Just Interpretations, above, note 16, at pp. 69-74.
24. Will Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 19
25. Frederick Pollock and Frederic William Maitland, The History of English Law (2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2 vols. 1923), vol. II, pp. 578-97.
26. Fleming James and Geoffrey C. Hazard, Civil Procedure (Boston: West Publishing Company, 1985), pp. 14-15
27. Jack H. Friendenthal, Mary Kay Kane and Arthur R. Miller, Civil Procedure (St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1985), p. 472.
28. Isaiah Berlin, ‘Two Conceptions of Liberty’ in his Four Essays on Liberty (London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 118
29. John Locke, The Second Treatise of Government (New York: Harlan Davidson, 1982), paras. 4, 6, 44, 123.
30. Michel Rosenfeld, ‘A Pluralist Critique of Contractarian Proceduralism’ (1998) 11 Ratio Juris, 291.
31. Laurence Tribe, Abortion: the Clash of Absolutes (2nd edn), New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1992
32. 1971 Associations Law Decision, above, note 20.
33. Georges Burdeau, Francis Hamon and Michel Troper, Droit Constitutionnel (25th edn, Paris: LGDJ/Montrestien, 1997), pp. 704-5
34. Bork, Tempting of America, above, note 9, at pp. 146-7.
35. Bork, Tempting of America, above, note 9, at pp. 264-5.
36. Joseph H. H.Weiler, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Reflections on Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal, 219.
37. Norman Dorsen, Michel Rosenfeld, Andras Sajo and Susanne Baer, Comparative Constitutionalism: Cases and Materials (St Paul: West Publishing Company, 2003), p. 65,.
38. Kathleen Sullivan and Gerald Gunther, Constitutional Law (14th edn, New York: Foundation Press, 2001), p. 531.
39. Bork, Tempting of America, above, note 9, at pp. 143-60.
40. Stone, Birth of Judicial Politics, above, note 4, at p. 48.
41. Sanford Levinson, “‘The Constitution’ in American Civil Religion” (1979) Supreme Court Review, 123
42. Sullivan, and Gunther, Constitutional Law, above, note 8080, at p. 454.
43. Ronald Dworkin, ‘The Forum of Principle’ (1981) 51 New York University Law Review, 469
44. John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust: a Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980).
45. Lawrence H. Tribe, ‘The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories’ (1980) 89 Yale Law Journal, 1063
46. Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974)
47. John Rawls, A Theory o f Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971).
48. Paul Brest, ‘The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding’ (1980) 60 Boston University Law Review, 204.
49. H. Jefferson Powell, ‘The Original Understanding of Original Intent’ (1985) 98 Harvard Law Review, 885
50. Schlink, S ‘German Constitutional Culture in Transition’, above, note 26.
51. Richard H. Fallon Jr., ‘A Constructivist Coherence Theory of Constitutional Interpretation’ (1987) 100 Harvard Law Review, 1189.
52. Winfried Brugger, ‘Legal Interpretation, Schools of Jurisprudence, and Anthropology: Some Remarks from a German Point of View’ (1994) 42 American Journal of Comparative Law, 395.
53. Fallon, ‘Constructivist Coherence Theory’, above, note 100, at 1194.
54. Fallon, ‘Constructivist Coherence Theory’, above, note 100, at 1204.
55. Tribe, Abortion, above, note 59.
56. Rousseau, ‘Constitutional Judge’, above, note 5
57. Schlink, ‘Constitutional Culture in Transition’, above, note 26
58. Grimm, ‘German and American Constitutionalism’, above, note 97
59. Jacobson, and Michel Rosenfeld, (eds.), The Longest Night: Polemics and Perspectives on Election (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000), p. 111
60. Charles Fried, ‘Response to Ronald Dworkin, A Badly Flawed Election’, in Jacobson and Rosenfeld, Longest Night, pp. 100-3.
61. Grimm, ‘German and American Constitutionalism’, above, note 97
62. ‘Bush puts Pickering on Appeal Court: Bush Bypasses Democrats who had Blocked Judge’ (16 January 2004) (available at) http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/16/bush.pickering.ap/.
63. Stone, Birth of Judicial Politics, above, note 4, at p. 48.
64. David W. Moore, ‘Public Divided Between Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Without Parole: Large Majority Supports Death Penalty if No Alternative is Specified’, The Gallup Organization, 2 June 2004 (available at) http://www.gallup.com/content/login.aspx?ci=11878.
65. Thomas Fuller and Katrin Bennhold, ‘Leaders Reach Agreement on European Constitution’, New York Times, 19 June 2004.
66. A Special Relationship: American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford: Loveland, Clarendon Press, 1995), p. 9.
67. V. Dicey, Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Macmillan, 1886)
68. deSmith, Woolf and Jowell, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1995), ch. 1
69. J. Jowell, ‘Judicial Difference and Human Rights. A question of competence’, in P. Craig and R. Rawlings (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe (2003)
70. N. Lacey, A Life of H. L. A. Hart (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), chs 8 and 10.
71. J. Handler, E. Hollingsworth and H. Erlanger, Lawyers and Pursuit of Legal Rights (New York: Academic Press, 1978).
72. J. Jowell, ‘The Legal Control of Administrative Discretion’ (1978) Public Law, 178. 18 Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor [1981] A.C. 648, 669.
73. Anthony Lester QC, ‘The Overseas Trade in the American Bill of Rights’, 88 Columbia L. Rev. (1988), 537, 543
74. C. Reich, ‘The New Property’, 73 Yale L. J. (1964), 733.
75. K. C. Davis, Discretionary Justice (1969).
76. C. Harlow, ‘A Special Relationship? American Influences on Judici al Review in England’, in I. Loveland, note 1 above. 22 376 US 254 (1964)
77. D. Anderson Deakin, Johnston Markesinis, Tort Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 721.
78. J. Schwarze, European Administrative Law (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1992).
79. L. Jaffe, English and American Judges as Lawmakers (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969) at 83
80. J. Jowell, ‘Beyond the Rule of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review’ (2000) Public Law, 671.
81. Harlow, and N. Duxbury, ‘Faith in Reason: the Process Tradition in American Jurisprudence’ (1993) Cardozo L. Rev., 601.
82. L. Fuller, ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) Harvard L. Rev, 353.
83. R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977); A Matter of Priniciple (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).
84. ‘The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy’, International Sociology, 18 (1) (2003), 133.
85. G. Brunner, ‘Entwicklung der polnischen Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in rechtsvergleichender Sicht’, in G. Brunner and L. Garlicki, Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in Polen (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999).
86. H. Schwartz, The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000).
87. L. Sólyom and G. Brunner, Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy. The Hungarian Constitutional Court (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000).
88. R. Procházka, Mission Accomplished. On Founding Constitutional Adjudication in Central Europe (Budapest, New York: Central European University Press, 2002).
89. C. Dupré: Importing the Law in Post-Communist Transitions. The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Right to Human Dignity (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2003).