Customary international law and the quest for global justice

The Nature of Customary Law

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 307-335

  Tasioulas, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927021955     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493744.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. L. May, Crimes against Humanity(Cambridge University Press, 2005).
2. B. Simma and P. Alston, ‘The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles’, Australian Year Book of International Law12 (1992): 82.
3. A. Buchanan, ‘From Nuremburg to Kosovo: The Morality of Illegal International Legal Reform’, Ethics111 (2001): 673-705.
4. R. E. Goodin, ‘Toward an International Rule of Law: Distinguishing International Law-Breakers from Would-Be Law-Makers’, Journal of Ethics9 (2005): 225-46.
5. A. Altman and C. H. Wellman, ‘A Defence of International Criminal Law’, Ethics115 (2004): 35-67.
6. W. M. Reisman, ‘The Cult of Custom in the Late 20th Century’, California Western International Law Journal17 (1987): 133.
7. A. Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (OUP, 2004), p. 468.
8. P. Allott, Eunomia: New Order for a New World (OUP, 1990), p. 336.
9. Buchanan B, ‘From Kosovo to Nuremberg’, p. 680.
10. P. Weil, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’, American Journal of International Law77 (1983): 413.
11. J. Tasioulas, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16 (1996): 85.
12. J. Rawls, Political Liberalism(Columbia University Press, 1993).
13. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples(Harvard University Press, 1999).
14. J. Tasioulas, ‘From Utopia to Kazanistan: John Rawls and the Law of Peoples’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies22 (2002): 367.
15. P. W. Kahn, Putting Liberalism in its Place (Princeton University Press, 2005), p. 280.
16. Kahn K, Putting Liberalism in its Place, pp. 19-20.
17. J. L. Goldsmith and E. A. Posner, The Limits of International Law (OUP, 2005), p. 24.
18. H. Thirlway, ‘The Sources of International Law as a Consensual Bond’, in Malcolm Evans (ed.), International Law(OUP, 2003), p. 128.
19. J. Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights(OUP, 1980), pp. 238-45.
20. J. Tasioulas, ‘The Legal Relevance of Ethical Objectivity’, American Journal of Jurisprudence47 (2002): 211-54.
21. J. Tasioulas, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies16 (1996): 85-128, at 109-15.
22. F.L. Kirgis, ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’, American Journal of International Law81 (1987): 146.
23. R. M. Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Fontana Press, 1986), p. 52.
24. R. McCorquodale, ‘An Inclusive International Legal System’, Leiden Journal of International Law17 (2004): 477-504, at 498.
25. A. E. Roberts, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’, American Journal of International Law 95 (2001): 757-773.
26. B. Williams, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics(CUP, 1972).
27. Roberts R, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches’, p. 778.
28. Tasioulas T, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity’, pp. 122-3.
29. H. Charlesworth and C. Chinkin, The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (Manchester University Press, 2000), p. 95 n. 210.
30. R. A. Falk, ‘Nuclear Weapons, International Law and the World Court: A Historic Encounter’, American Journal of International Law91 (1997): 64-75.
31. M. Koskenniemi, ‘What Is International Law For’, in M. Evans (ed.), International Law(OUP, 2003), p. 101.