Prosodic weight

The Syllable in Optimality Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 123-144

  Zec, Draga ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927014387     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511497926.006     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Bethin, C. Y. (1998). Slavic Prosody: Language Change and Phonological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Borkovskij, V. I., and P S. Kuznecov. (1965). Istoriceskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Nauka.
3. Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, ed. J. Kingston and M. Beckman, 283-333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Gordon, M. K. (1999). Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, and typology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
5. Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 227-276.
6. Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 253-306.
7. Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Hooper, J. B. (1976). An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
9. Hyman, L. (1984). A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.
10. Isacenko, A. V. (1970). East Slavic morphophonemics and the treatment of the jers in Russian: A revision of Havlik’s Law. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 13: 73-124.
11. Ito, J., and A. Mester. (1993). Licensed segments and safe paths. In Constraint-Based Theories in Multilinear Phonology, ed. C. Paradis and D. LaCharite. Special issue, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38: 197-213.
12. Kahn, D. (1978). Syllable-based generalization in English phonology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
13. Kenstowicz, M. (1996). Quantity sensitive stress. Rivista di Linguistica 9: 157-187.
14. Kiparsky, P (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10:421-441.
15. Kiparsky, P (1981). Remarks on the metrical structure of the syllable. In Phonologica1980, ed. W. Dressler et al., 245-256. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
16. Kiparsky, V (1979). Russian Historical Grammar. Vol. 1: The Development of the Sound System. (Translated from the German by J. I. Press.). Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ardis.
17. Levin, J. (1987). A metrical theory of syllabicity. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
18. Lightner, T. M. (1972). Russian Phonology and Turkish Phonology: Problems in the Theory of Phonology. Edmonton, Alb.: Linguistic Research, Inc.
19. Lunt, H. (1959). Old Church Slavonic Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
20. McCarthy, J. J. (2000). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16: 331-399.
21. McCarthy, J., and A. Prince. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass.
22. McCarthy, J., and A. Prince. (1993a). Prosodic morphology 1: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.
23. McCarthy, J., and A. Prince. (1993b). Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of Morphology1993, ed. G. Booij, and J. van Marle, 79-153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. McCarthy, J., and A. Prince. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In UMOP18, ed. Jill Beckman et al., 249-384. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
25. Nespor, M., and I. Vogel. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
26. Payne, J. (1990). Asheninca stress patterns. In Amazonian Linguistics, ed. D. L. Payne, 185-212. Austin: University of Texas Press.
27. Prince, A. S. (1990). Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. In Papers from the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 2: The Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, ed. M. Ziolkowski et al., 355-398. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
28. Prince, A., and P Smolensky. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and University of Colorado, Boulder.
29. Selkirk, E. O. (1984a). Phonology and Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
30. Selkirk, E. O. (1984b). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Language Sound Structure, ed. M. Aronoff and R. Oehrle, 107-136. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
31. Selkirk, E. O. (1995). Prosodic structure of function words. In UMOP18, ed. J. Beckman et al., 439-469. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
32. Shevelov, J. (1965). A Prehistory of Slavic. The Hague: Mouton.
33. Steriade, D. (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
34. Tsuchida, A. (1997). Phonetics and phonology of Japanese vowel devoicing. Doctoral dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
35. Tsygankin, P J., and C. Z. Debaev. (1975). Ocerk sravnitel’noj grammatiki mordovskix (moksanskogo i erz’anskogo) literaturnix jazykov. Saransk: Mordovskij gosudarstven-nyj universitet imeni N.P. Ogareva.
36. Zec, D. (1988). Sonority constraints on prosodic structure. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
37. Zec, D. (1995). Sonority constraints on syllable structure. Phonology 12: 85-129.
38. Zec, D. (2000). Multiple Sonority Thresholds. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, ed. T. H. King and I. A. Sekerina, 382-413. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.