The influence of school reform on classroom instruction in diverse schools: Findings from an observational study of success for all

Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms: New Approaches for Understanding Cultural and Linguistic Diversity

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 231-265

  Castellano, Marisa ^a   Datnow, Amanda ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926985695     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511616419.010     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Abrahams, R. D., & Troike, R. C. (1972). Language and cultural diversity in American education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
3. Brophy, J. E. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. Elementary School Journal, 89, 3–22.
4. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
5. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Cooper, R. (1998a). Socio-cultural and within-school factors that affect the quality of implementation of school-wide programs (Report No. 28). Baltimore: Centerfor Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns HopkinsUniversity.
7. Cooper, R. (1998b). Success for All: Improving the quality of implementation of whole school change through local and national support networks. Educationand Urban Society, 30(3), 385–408.
8. Cooper, R., Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1997). Success for All: Exploring the technical, normative, political, and socio-cultural dimensions of scaling up (ReportNo. 16). Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placedat Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
9. Cummins, J. (1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento: California Association of Bilingual Education.
10. Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000a). An “inside” look at Success for All: A qualitative study of implementation and teaching and learning (Report No. 45). Baltimore:Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, JohnsHopkins University and Howard University.
11. Datnow, A. & Castellano, M. (2000b). Teachers’ responses to Success for All: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. AmericanEducational Research Journal, 37(3), 775–799.
12. Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2001). Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in Success for All schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 219–249.
13. Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.
14. Evertson, C., & Green, J. L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 162–207). New York: Macmillan.
15. Fillmore, L.W. (1990). Latino families and schools. Sacramento, CA: Remarks prepared for the Seminar on California’s Changing Face of Race Relations: New Ethics in the 1990s.
16. Foley, D. E. (1991). Reconsidering anthropological explanations of ethnic school failure. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22(1), 60–86.
17. Franklin, E. A. (1986). Literacy instruction for LES children. Language Arts, 63(1), 51–60.
18. Gilmore, P., & Glatthorn, A. (1982). Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education.Washington, DC: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich and the Center forApplied Linguistics.
19. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1987). Looking in classrooms (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
20. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Herman, R. (1999). An educators’ guide to schoolwide reform. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
22. Johnston, W. B., & Packer, A. B. (1987). Workplace 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
23. Knapp, M. S., & Adelman, N. E. (1995). Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Macleod, J. (1987). Ain’t no makin’ it: Leveled aspirations in a low income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25. Madden, N., Livingston, M., & Cummings, N. (1998). Success for All: Roots and Wings principal’s and facilitator’s manual. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
26. Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65(1), 1–20.
27. Michaels, K. (1988). Caution: Second-wave reform taking place. Educational Leadership, 45(5), 3.
28. National Center on Education and the Economy. (1990). America’s choice: High skills or low wages! (The report of the Commission on the Skills of the AmericanWork Force). Rochester, NY: Author.
29. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government PrintingOffice.
30. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
31. Nunnery, J., Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Hunter, P., & Stubbs, J. (1997). Effects of full and partial implementation of Success forAll on student reading achievement in English and Spanish. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
32. Padrón, Y. (1992). Instructional programs that improve the reading comprehension of students at risk. In H. C. Waxman, J. de Felix, J. Anderson, & J. Baptiste (Eds.), Students at risk in at-risk schools (pp. 222–232). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
33. Philips, S. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In C. Cazden, V. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370–394). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Lohr, L. L., & McNelis, M. J. (1994). Math and reading instruction in tracked first-grade classes. The Elementary School Journal, 95(1), 105–109.
35. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1996). Scaling up: Lessons learned in the dissemination of Success for All (Report No. 6). Baltimore: Center for Research on theEducation of Students Placed at Risk.
36. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1999). Effects of bilingual and second language adaptations of Success for All on the reading achievement of students acquiring English. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 4(4), 393–416.
37. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1996). Every child, every school: Success for All. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
38. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., Wasik, B. A., Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., & Dianda, M. (1996). Success for All:Asummary of research. Journal of Educationfor Students Placed At Risk, 1(1), 41–76.
39. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Karweit, N., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1992). Success for All: A relentless approach to prevention and early intervention in elementaryschools. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
40. Spindler, G. D. (1982). Doing the ethnography of schooling. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
41. Stallings, J. A. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11–16.
42. Stringfield, S., Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Rachuba, L. (1999). National evaluation of Core Knowledge Sequence implementation: Final report. Baltimore: Center forSocial Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
43. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., Yoder, N., Schaffer, E., Nesselrodt, P., Gamse, B., Brigham, N., Moss, M., Herman, R., & Bedinger, S. (1997). Special strategiesstudies final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
44. Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1991). Observers as predictors of schools’ multiyear outlier status on achievement tests. The Elementary School Journal, 91(4), 357–376.
45. Teddlie, C., Kirby, P., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Effective vs. ineffective schools: Observable differences in the classroom. American Journal of Education, 97(3), 221–236.
46. Tharp, R. G. (1997). From at-risk to excellence: Research, theory, and principles for practice (Research Report No. 1). Santa Cruz: Center for Researchon Education, Diversity & Excellence, University of California.
47. Valdes, G. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools, an ethnographic portrait. New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.