Confirmatory factor analysis of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 176-181

  Chung, Bryan T ^a   Morris, Steven F ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis; Hand; Item reduction; Michigan Hand Questionnaire; Outcome tool; Questionnaire; Validatio construct validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DISABILITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HAND INJURIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HAND INJURIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84926977369     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: 15363708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182956659     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Streiner D, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
2. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:575Y587.
3. Byrne BM. Factor analytic models: viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. J Pers Assess. 2005;85:17-32.
4. Chung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, et al. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:619-622.
5. Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33:9-17.
6. Horng YS, Lin MC, Feng CT, et al. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:430-436.
7. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:81-86.
8. Kotsis SV, Lau FH, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:84-90.
9. Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:509-514.
10. Waljee JF, Chung KC, Kim HM, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, international study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:1569-1577.
11. Bentler PM, Stein JA. Structural equation models in medical research. Stat Methods Med Res. 1992;1:159-181.
12. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.
13. Waljee JF, Kim HM, Burns PB, et al. Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:208-220.