The political consequences of internal party democracy

Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions, and Accountability

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 157-201

  Maravall, José María ^a,b  

^a Instituto Juan March   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926975550     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511611414.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Abramowitz, Alan I. 1989. “Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a Presidential Primary Election: A Test of Competing Models.” Journal of Politics51 (4): 977–92.
2. Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14 (3): 195–212.
3. Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Alesina, Alberto, and Stephen E. Spear. 1988. “An Overlapping Generation Model of Electoral Competition.” Journal of Public Economics37 (3): 359–79.
5. Alt, James E. 1984. “Dealignment and the Dynamics of Partisanship in Britain.” In Russell J. Dalton, Scott C. Flanagan, and Paul. A. Beck (eds.), Electoral Changein Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6. Attlee, Clement. 1937. The Labour Party in Perspective. London: Odham.
7. Austen-Smith, David. 1990. “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science34 (1): 124–52.
8. Benn, Tony. 1992. The End of An Era. London: Hutchinson.
9. Bille, Lars. 2001. “Democratizing a Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality? Candidate Selection in Western European Parties, 1960–1990.” Party Politics7 (3): 363–80.
10. Caillaud, Bernard, and Jean Tirole. 2002. “Parties as Political Intermediaries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics117 (4): 1453–89.
11. Cebrián, Juan Luis. 1989. “Reflexiones Electorales.” El País, 9 October. Cheibub, José Antonio, and Adam Przeworski. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cotta, Maurizio. 1999. “On the Relationship between Party and Government.” Occasional Papers 6/1999. Universitá degli Studi di Siena (published in Jean Blondel and Maurizio Cotta (eds.), The Nature of Party Government. London: Macmillan, 2000).
13. Cox, Gary. 1987. “Electoral Equilibria Under Alternative Voting Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science31 (1): 82–108.
14. Cox, Gary. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science34 (4): 903–35.
15. Crossman, Richard. 1961. The New Statesman. 30 June.
16. Crossman, Richard. 1963. Foreword to William Bagehot, The English Constitution. London: Fontana.
17. Dahl, Robert. 1970. After the Revolution?New Haven: Yale University Press.
18. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper-Collins.
19. Ferejohn, John, and Roger G. Noll. 1978. “Uncertainty and the Formal Theory of Political Campaigns.” American Political Science Review72 (2): 492–505.
20. Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice. 1994. Labour’s Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
23. Hirschman, Albert. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Holmes, Martin. 1985. The Labour Government, 1974–79. London: Macmillan. Howell, David. 1976. British Social Democracy. London: Croom Helm.
25. Iversen, Torben. 1994a. “Political Leadership and Representation in West European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting.” American Journal of PoliticalScience38 (1): 45–74.
26. Iversen, Torben. 1994b. “The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional, and Mobilizational Effects.” Comparative Political Studies27 (2): 155–89.
27. Kato, Junko. 1998. “When the Party Breaks Up. Exit and Voice among Japanese Legislators.” American Political Science Review92 (4): 857–70.
28. Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics1 (1): 5–28.
29. Key, Vernon O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage Books.
30. Kiewiet, Roderick, and Mathew McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
31. Lohmann, Suzanne. 1998. “An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests.” American Political Science Review92 (4): 809–27.
32. Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Mair, Peter, and Ingrid van Biezen. 2001. “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies.” Party Politics7 (1): 5–21.
34. Manin, Bernard, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Maravall, José María. 1991. “From Opposition to Government. The Politics and Policies of the PSOE.” In José María Maravall et al. (eds.), Socialist Parties inEurope. Barcelona: ICPS.
36. Maravall, José María. 2007. “Accountability and the Survival of Governments.” In Carles Boix and Susan Stokes (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. May, John D. 1973. “Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity.” Political Studies21 (2): 133–51.
38. McKenzie, Robert. 1982. “Power in the Labour Party: The Issue of Intra-Party Democracy.” In Dennis Kavanagh (ed.), The Politics of the Labour Party. London: Allen & Unwin.
39. Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties. New York: Free Press.
40. Minkin, Lewis, and Patrick Seyd. 1977. “The British Labour Party.” In William E. Patterson and Alastair H. Thomas (eds.), Social Democratic Parties in WesternEurope. London: Croom Helm.
41. Müller, Wolfgang. 2000. “Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work.” European Journal of Political Research37 (3): 309–33.
42. Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
43. Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of PoliticalScience37 (2): 391–414.
44. Ranney, Austin. 1981. “Candidate Selection.” In David Butler, Howard Penniman, and Austin Ranney (eds.), Democracy at the Polls. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
45. Richards, Andrew. 1997. The Life and Soul of the Party: Causes and Consequences of Organizational Change in the British Labour Party, 1979–1997. Estudio/Working Paper 1997/95. Madrid: Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones.
46. Rosenstone, Steven. 1995. “Electoral Institutions and Democratic Choice.” Paper presented at workshop on “The Impact of Institutional Arrangements on Electoral Behavior.” European Consortium for Political Research, joint sessions of workshops. Bordeaux, 27 April–2 May.
47. Samuelson, Paul A. 1958. “An Exact Consumption–Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money.” Journal of Political Economy66 (6): 467–82.
48. Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham: Chatham House.
49. Scarrow, Susan. 1999. “Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy: Who Benefits?” Party Politics5 (3): 343–62.
50. Seyd, Patrick, and Paul Whiteley. 1992. Labour’s Grass Roots. The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
51. Shepsle, Kenneth, and Ronald Cohen. 1990. “Multiparty Competition, Entry, and Entry Deterrence in Spatial Models of Elections.” In James Enelow and Melvin Hinich (eds.), Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Stokes, Susan C. 1999. “Political Parties and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science2 (1): 243–67.
53. Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Stone, Walter J., and Alan I. Abramowitz. 1984. Nomination Politics: Party Activists and Presidential Choice. New York: Praeger.
55. Strøm, Kaare. 1990. “A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science34 (2): 565–98.
56. Webb, Beatrice. Diaries. 19 May 1930. Archives Division, British Library of Political and Economic Science. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
57. Webb, Paul. 2000. The Modern British Party System. London: Sage Publications.
58. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1965. “The Goldwater Phenomenon: Purists, Politicians, and the Two-Party System.” Review of Politics27 (3): 386–413.
59. Williams, Philip. 1982. Hugh Gaitskell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Wittman, Donald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.