Federal preemption by inaction

Preemption Choice: The Theory, Law, and Reality of Federalism's Core Question

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 167-191

  Glicksman, Robert L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926970408     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511552007.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Robert L. Glicksman, “Nothing Is Real: Protecting the Regulatory Void through Preemption by Inaction,” Virginia Environmental Law Journal 26 (2008): 5.
2. Joshua B. Fershee, “Levels of Green: State and Local Efforts, in Wyoming and Beyond, to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Wyoming Law Review 7 (2007): 269, 279.
3. Robert B. McKinstry Jr. and Thomas D. Peterson, “The Implications of the New ‘Old’ Federalism in Climate-Change Legislation: How to Function in a Global Marketplace Whenthe State Takes the Lead,” Pacific McGeorge Global Business and Development Law Journal 20 (2007): 61.
4. Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 461 U.S. 375, 384 (1983).
5. Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass’n, 128 S. Ct. 989-995 (2008).
6. Morales v. TransWorld Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374 (1992).
7. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218-230 (1947).
8. Rapanos v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 2208-2224 (2006)