Self-reported pediatric measures of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and strength impact for PROMIS: Item development

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 385-392

  Tucker, Carole A ^a   Bevans, Katherine B ^b,c   Teneralli, Rachel E ^b   Smith, Ashley Wilder ^d   Bowles, Heather R ^d   Forrest, Christopher B ^b,c  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84926671751     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: 1538005X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000074     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. ®: conceptual framework. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014;26(4):376-384.
2. Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Dumas HM, et al. Evaluation of an item bank for a computerized adaptive test of activity in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2009;89(6):589-600.
3. Forrest CB, Bevans KB, Tucker C, et al. The patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) for children and youth: application to pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012;37(6):614-621.
4. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45:S3-S11. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.
5. ®. Instrument Development and Validation Scientific Standards, Version 2.0. http://www.nihpromis.org/Documents/PROMISStandards-Vers2.0-Final.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2013.
6. Klare G. A second look at the validity of readability formulas. J Reading Behav. 1976;8:129-152.
7. Wild D, Eremenco S, Mear I, Martin M, Houchin C, Gawlicki M. Multinational trials-recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: the ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Good. Value Health. 2009;12:430-440.
8. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
9. Fortune-Greeley AK, Flynn KE, Jeffery DD, et al. Using cognitive interviews to evaluate items for measuring sexual functioning across cancer populations: improvements and remaining challenges. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1085-1093.
10. Bjorner JB, Chang CH, Thissen D, Reeve BB. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(suppl 1):95-108.
11. Cella D, Gershon R, Lai J-S, Choi SW. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:133-141.