Effect of visco-elastic silk–chitosan microcomposite scaffolds on matrix deposition and biomechanical functionality for cartilage tissue engineering

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 1212-1229

  Chameettachal, Shibu ^a   Murab, Sumit ^a   Vaid, Radhika ^a   Midha, Swati ^a   Ghosh, Sourabh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

cartilage; chitosan; extracellular matrix; silk; tissue engineering; visco elastic

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BODY FLUIDS; CHITOSAN; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; COPYRIGHTS; ELASTICITY; REINFORCEMENT; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SILK;

CARTILAGE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CARTILAGE TISSUES; CHITOSAN; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS; MICROCOMPOSITE; SILK; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS; VISCO-ELASTIC; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES;

CARTILAGE;

CHITOSAN; COLLAGEN TYPE 2; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN; SILK; COLLAGEN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CELL VIABILITY; CHONDROCYTE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MTT ASSAY; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POROSITY; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VISCOELASTICITY; X RAY DIFFRACTION; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; BOMBYX; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; ELASTICITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GOAT; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; VISCOSITY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BOMBYX; CARTILAGE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHITOSAN; COLLAGEN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS; GOATS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; PARTICLE SIZE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILK; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; VISCOSITY; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84926631378     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.2024     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alves da Silva ML, Crawford A, Mundy JM et al. 2010; Chitosan/polyester-based scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering: assessment of extracellular matrix formation. Acta Biomater 6: 1149–1157.
2. Asakura T, Tabeta R, Saito H 1985; Conformational characterization of Bombyx mori silk fibroin in the solid state by high-frequency carbon-13 crosspolarization–magic angle spinning NMR, X-ray diffraction, and infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules 18: 1841–1845.
3. Augst A, Marolt D, Freed LE et al. 2008; Effects of chondrogenic and osteogenic regulatory factors on composite constructs grown using human mesenchymal stem cells, silk scaffolds and bioreactors. J R Soc Interface 5: 929–939.
4. Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC 2012; Chondrogenic differentiation of rat MSCs on porous scaffolds of silk fibroin/chitosan blends. Biomaterials 33: 2848–2857.
5. Bhardwaj N, Nguyen QT, Chen AC et al. 2011; Potential of 3D tissue constructs engineered from bovine chondrocytes/silk fibroin-chitosan for in vitro cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32: 5773–5781.
6. Bhattacharjee M, Coburn J, Centola M et al. 2014; Tissue engineering strategies to study cartilage development, degeneration and regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev •••; •••–•••; DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.08.010.
7. Boddohi S, Moore N, Johnson PA et al. 2009; Polysaccharide-based polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles from chitosan, heparin, and hyaluronan. Biomacromolecules 10: 1402–1409.
8. Buckley CT, Meyer EG, Kelly DJ. 2012; The influence of construct scale on the composition and functional properties of cartilaginous tissues engineered using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng A 18: 382–396.
9. Das S, Pati F, Chameettachal S et al. 2013; Enhanced redifferentiation of chondrocytes on microperiodic silk/gelatin scaffolds: toward tailor-made tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 14: 311–321.
10. Denuziere A, Ferrief D, Domard A. 1996; Chitosan–chondroitin sulphate and chitosan–hyaluronate polyelectrolyte complexes: physico-chemical aspects. Carbohyd Polym 29: 311–323.
11. Denuziere A, Ferrier D, Damour O et al. 1998; Chitosan–chondroitin sulfate and chitosan–hyaluronate polyelectrolyte complexes: biological properties. Biomaterials 19: 1275–1285.
12. Dong A, Huang P, Caughey WS. 1990; Protein secondary structures in water from second derivative amide I infrared spectra. Biochemistry 29: 3303–3308.
13. Edelsten L, Jeffrey JE, Burgina LV et al. 2010; Viscoelastic deformation of articular cartilage during impact loading. Soft Matter 6: 5206–5212.
14. Farndale RW, Buttle DJ, Barrett AJ. 1986; Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta 883: 173–177.
15. Fernandez JG, Ingber DE. 2012; Unexpected strength and toughness in chitosan–fibroin laminates inspired by insect cuticle. Adv Mater 24: 480–484.
16. Ghosh S, Laha M, Mondal S et al. 2009; In vitro model of mesenchymal condensation during chondrogenic development. Biomaterials 30: 6530–6540.
17. Ghosh S, Parker ST, Wang X et al. 2008; Direct-write assembly of microperiodic silk fibroin scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Adv Funct Mater 18: 1883–1889.
18. Hu X, Kaplan D, Cebe P. 2006; Dynamic protein − water relationships during β-sheet formation. Macromolecules 39: 6161–6170.
19. Jung C. 2000; Insight into protein structure and protein–ligand recognition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J Mol Recogn 13: 325–351.
20. Kwan MK, Lai WM, Mow VC. 1984; Fundamentals of fluid transport through cartilage in compression. Ann Biomed Eng 2: 537–558.
21. Kweon H, Ha HC, Um IC et al. 2011; Physical properties of silk fibroin/chitosan blend films. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 928–934.
22. Lahiji A, Sohrabi A, Hungerford DS et al. 2000; Chitosan supports the expression of extracellular matrix proteins in human osteoblasts and chondrocytes. J Biomed Mater Res 51: 586–595.
23. Lark MW, Gordy JT, Weidner JR et al. 1995; Cell-mediated catabolism of aggrecan. Evidence that cleavage at the 'aggrecanase' site (Glu373–Ala374) is a primary event in proteolysis of the interglobular domain. J Biol Chem 270: 2550–2556.
24. Little CJ, Bawolin NK, Chen X. 2011; Mechanical properties of natural cartilage and tissue engineered constructs. Tissue Eng B Rev 17: 213–227.
25. Ma G, Yang D, Zhou Y et al. 2008; Preparation and characterization of water-soluble N-alkylated chitosan. Carbohyd Polym 74: 121–126.
26. Mandal BB, Gil ES, Panilaitis B et al. 2013; Laminar silk scaffolds for aligned tissue fabrication. Macromol Biosci 13: 48–58.
27. Mandal BB, Grinberg A, Gil ES et al. 2012; High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 7699–7704.
28. Maurstad G, Danielsen S, Stokke BT. 2007; The influence of charge density of chitosan in the compaction of the polyanions DNA and xanthan. Biomacromolecules 8: 1124–1130.
29. Mo C, Holland C, Porter D et al. 2009; Concentration state dependence of the rheological and structural properties of reconstituted silk. Biomacromolecules 10: 2724–2728.
30. Moulharat N, Lesur C, Thomas M et al. 2004; Effects of transforming growth factor-β on aggrecanase production and proteoglycan degradation by human chondrocytes in vitro. Osteoarthr Cartilage 12: 296–305.
31. Moutos FT, Freed LE, Guilak F. 2007; A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater 6: 162–167.
32. Mouw JK, Case ND, Guldberg RE et al. 2005; Variations in matrix composition and GAG fine structure among scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Osteoarthr Cartilage 13: 828–836.
33. Mow VC, Guo XE. 2002; Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 4: 175–209.
34. Mow VC, Kuei SC, Lai WM et al. 1980; Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng 102: 73–84.
35. Murab S, Chameettachal S, Bhattacharjee M et al. 2013; Matrix-embedded cytokines to simulate osteoarthritis-like cartilage microenvironments. Tissue Eng A 19: 1733–1753.
36. Nguyen QT, Hwang Y, Chen AC et al. 2012; Cartilage-like mechanical properties of poly(ethylene glycol)–diacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 33: 6682–6690.
37. Niamsa N, Srisuwan Y, Baimark Y et al. 2009; Preparation of nanocomposite chitosan/silk fibroin blend films containing nanopore structures. Carbohyd Polym 78: 60–65.
38. Park S, Nicoll SB, Mauck RL et al. 2008; Cartilage mechanical response under dynamic compression at physiological stress levels following collagenase digestion. Ann Biomed Eng 36: 425–434.
39. Rajkhowa R, Gil ES, Kluge J et al. 2010; Reinforcing silk scaffolds with silk particles. Macromol Biosci 10: 599–611.
40. Sampaio S, Taddei P, Monti P et al. 2005; Enzymatic grafting of chitosan onto Bombyx mori silk fibroin: kinetic and IR vibrational studies. J Biotechnol 116: 21–33.
41. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012; NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 671–675.
42. Sechriest VF, Miao YJ, Niyibizi C et al. 2000; GAG-augmented polysaccharide hydrogel: a novel biocompatible and biodegradable material to support chondrogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res 49: 534–541.
43. Seda Tigli R, Ghosh S, Laha MM et al. 2009; Comparative chondrogenesis of human cell sources in 3D scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 3: 348–360.
44. Skaalure SC, Milligan IL, Bryant SJ. 2012; Age impacts extracellular matrix metabolism in chondrocytes encapsulated in degradable hydrogels. Biomed Mater 7: 024111.
45. Suh JK, Li Z, Woo SL. 1995; Dynamic behavior of a biphasic cartilage model under cyclic compressive loading. J Biomech 28: 357–364.
46. Suh JK, Matthew HW. 2000; Application of chitosan-based polysaccharide biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: a review. Biomaterials 21: 2589–2598.
47. Sztrolovics R, White RJ, Roughley PJ et al. 2002; The mechanism of aggrecan release from cartilage differs with tissue origin and the agent used to stimulate catabolism. Biochem J 362: 465–472.
48. Taddei P, Monti P. 2005; Vibrational infrared conformational studies of model peptides representing the semicrystalline domains of Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Biopolymers 78: 249–258.
49. Varga F, Drzik M, Handl M et al. 2007; Biomechanical characterization of cartilages by a novel approach of blunt impact testing. Physiol Res 56: S61–S68.
50. Wang Y, Blasioli DJ, Kim HJ et al. 2006; Cartilage tissue engineering with silk scaffolds and human articular chondrocytes. Biomaterials 27: 4434–4442.
51. Wei Y, Gong K, Zheng Z et al. 2011; Chitosan/silk fibroin-based tissue-engineered graft seeded with adipose-derived stem cells enhances nerve regeneration in a rat model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 22: 1947–1964.
52. Woessner JF. 1961; The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. Arch Biochem Biophys 93: 440–447.
53. Woodfield TB, Miot S, Martin I et al. 2006; The regulation of expanded human nasal chondrocyte redifferentiation capacity by substrate composition and gas plasma surface modification. Biomaterials 27: 1043–1053.
54. Wray LS, Hu X, Gallego J et al. 2011; Effect of processing on silk-based biomaterials: reproducibility and biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 99: 89–101.
55. Yan LP, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira MB et al. 2014; Bilayered silk/silk–nanoCaP scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: in vitro and in vivo assessment of biological performance. Acta Biomater 12: 227–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.021.
56. Yang J, Han CR, Duan JF et al. 2013; Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of cellulose nanocrystals reinforced poly(ethylene glycol) nanocomposite hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5: 3199–3207.
57. Yodmuang S, McNamara SL, Nover AB et al. 2015; Silk microfiber-reinforced silk hydrogel composites for functional cartilage tissue repair. Acta Biomater 11: 27–36.