The antisaccade task: Visual distractors elicit a location-independent planning 'cost'

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  DeSimone, Jesse C ^a   Everling, Stefan ^b   Heath, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REMOTE DISTRACTOR EFFECT; RESPONSE TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SACCADIC SUPPRESSION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISTRACTION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; REACTION TIME; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926512981     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122345     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Wurtz RH, Albano JE. Visual-motor function of primate superior colliculus. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1980; 3: 189-226. PMID: 6774653
2. Walker R, Deubel H, Schneider WX, Findlay JM. Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: Evidence for an extended fixation zone. J Neurophysiol. 1997; 78: 1108-1119. PMID: 9307138
3. Lévy-Schoen A. Détermination et latence de la réponse oculomotrice à deux stimulus simultanés ou successifs selon leur excentricité relative. L'Anée Psychol. 1969; 69: 373-392.
4. Coren S, Hoenig P. Effect of non-target stimuli upon length of voluntary saccades. Percept Mot Skills. 1972; 34: 499-508. PMID: 5063190
5. Deubel H, Wolf W, Hauske G. The evaluation of the oculomotor error signal. In: Gale AG, Johnson F, editors, Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1984. pp. 55-61.
6. Findlay JM. Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Res. 1982; 22: 1033-1045. PMID: 7135840
7. Van der Stigchel S, Nijboer TCW. The global effect: what determines where the eyes land? J Eye Mov Res. 2011; 4: 1-13. PMID: 21603125
8. Godijn R, Theeuwes J. Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002; 28: 1039-1054. PMID: 12421054
9. Trappenberg TP, Dorris MC, Munoz DP, Klein RM. A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 13: 256-271. PMID: 11244550
10. Dorris MC, Oliver E, Munoz DP. Competitive integration of visual and preparatory signals in the superior colliculus during saccadic programming. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 5053-5062. PMID: 17494691
11. Takahashi M, Sugiuchi Y, Izawa Y, Shinoda Y. Commissural excitation and inhibition by the superior colliculus in tectoreticular neurons projecting to omnipause neuron and inhibitory burst neuron regions. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94: 1707-1726. PMID: 16105954
12. Findlay JM, Walker R. A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behav Brain Sci. 1999; 22: 661-721. PMID: 11301526
13. Van Gisbergen JA, Van Opstal AJ, Tax AAM. Collicular ensemble coding of saccades based on vector summation. Neuroscience. 1987; 21: 541-555. PMID: 3614643
14. Van Opstal AJ, Van Gisbergen JA. A nonlinear model for collicular spatial interactions underlying the metrical properties of electrically elicited saccades. Biol Cybern. 1989; 60: 171-183. PMID: 2923922
15. Hallett PE. Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Res. 1978; 18: 1279-1296. PMID: 726270
16. Hallett PE, Adams BD. The predictability of saccadic latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task. Vision Res. 1980; 20: 329-339. PMID: 7414965
17. Fischer B, Weber H. Characteristics of " anti" saccades in man. Exp Brain Res. 1992; 89: 415-424. PMID: 1623983
18. Dafoe JM, Armstrong IT, Munoz DP. The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 179: 563-570. PMID: 17171535
19. Krappmann P, Everling S, Flohr H. Accuracy of visually and memory-guided antisaccades in man. Vision Res. 1998; 38: 2979-2985. PMID: 9797993
20. Heath M, Weiler J, Marriott K, Welsh T. Vector inversion diminishes the online control of antisaccades. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 209: 117-127. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2525-7 PMID: 21210087
21. Munoz DP, Everling S. Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5: 218-228. PMID: 14976521
22. Kveraga K, Boucher L, Hughes HC. Saccades operate in violation of Hick's Law. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 146: 307-314. PMID: 12232687
23. Hick WE. On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol. 1952; 4: 11-26.
24. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10: 433-436. PMID: 9176952
25. Olk B, Kingstone A. Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. Neuroreport. 2003; 14(1): 151-155. PMID: 12544848
26. DeSimone JC, Weiler J, Aber GS, Heath M. The unidirectional prosaccade switch cost: Correct and error antisaccades differentially influence the planning times for subsequent prosaccades. Vision Res. 2014; 96: 17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.005 PMID: 24412739
27. Weiler J, Heath M. Oculomotor task switching: alternating from a nonstandard to a standard response yields the unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost. J Neurophysiol. 2014; 112: 2176-2184. doi: 10.1152/ jn.00352.2014 PMID: 25122700
28. Loftus GR, Masson ME. Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994; 1: 476-490. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951 PMID: 24203555
29. Cumming G. Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge; 2011.
30. Cumming G. The new statistics: Why and how. Psychol Sci. 2013; 25: 7-29. doi: 10.1177/ 0956797613504966 PMID: 24220629
31. Kowler E, Blaser E. The accuracy and precision of saccades to small and large targets. Vision Res. 1995; 35: 1741-1754. PMID: 7660582
32. Casteau S, Vitu F. On the effect of remote and proximal distractors on saccadic behavior: A challenge to the neural-field models. J Vis. 2012; 12(14): 1-33.
33. Dorris MC, Munoz DP. Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation. J Neurosci. 1998; 18: 7015-7026. PMID: 9712670
34. Ottes FP, Van Gisbergen JA, Eggermont JJ. Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system. Vision Res. 1985; 25: 849-862. PMID: 4024483
35. Gaveau V, Martin O, Prablanc C, Pelisson D, Urquizar C, Desmurget M. On-line modification of saccadic eye movements by retinal signals. Neuroreport. 2003; 14: 875-878. PMID: 12858051
36. West GL, Welsh TN, Pratt J. Saccadic trajectories receive online correction: Evidence for a feedbackbased system of oculomotor control. J Mot Behav. 2009; 41: 117-127. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.41.2.117-127 PMID: 19201682
37. Benson V. A comparison of bilateral versus unilateral target and distractor presentation in the remote distractor paradigm. Exp Psychol. 2008; 55(5): 334-341. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.334 PMID: 25116301
38. Doyle M, Walker R. Curved saccade trajectories: Voluntary and reflexive saccades curve away from irrelevant distractors. Exp Brain Res. 2001; 139: 333-344. PMID: 11545472
39. Tipper SP, Howard LA, Houghton G. Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000; 353: 1385-1393. PMID: 9770231
40. Tipper SP, Howard LA, Paul MA. Reaching affects saccade trajectories. Exp Brain Res. 2001; 136: 241-249. PMID: 11206286
41. Walker R, McSorley E. The influence of distractors on saccade-target selection: Saccade trajectory effects. J Eye Mov Res. 2008; 2: 7:1-13.
42. Kloft L, Reuter B, Viswanathan J, Kathmann N, Barton JJS. Response selection in prosaccades, antisaccades, and other volitional saccades. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 222: 245-353.
43. Lawrence BM. An anti-Hick's effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements. Exp Brain Res. 2010; 204: 115-188. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2301-8 PMID: 20521032
44. Irwin DE, Thomas LE. The effect of saccades on number processing. Percept Psychophys. 2007; 69: 450-458. PMID: 17672432
45. Pashler HE. The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
46. Sato TS, Schall JD. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field. Neuron. 2003; 38: 637-648. PMID: 12765614
47. Viswanathan J, Barton JJS. The global effect for antisaccades. Exp Brain Res. 2013; 225(2): 247-259. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3366-3 PMID: 23254509
48. Evdokimidis I, Tsekou H, Smyrnis N. The mirror antisaccade task: direction-amplitude interaction and spatial accuracy characteristics. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 174: 304-311. PMID: 16636790
49. Gillen C, Heath M. Target frequency influences antisaccade endpoint bias: Evidence for perceptual averaging. Vision Res. 2014; 105: 151-158. PMID: 25449162
50. Gillen C, Heath M. Perceptual averaging governs antisaccade endpoint bias. Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232: 3201-3210. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4010-1 PMID: 24935477