Cryptic matters: Overlooked species generate most butterfly beta-diversity

Ecography

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 405-409

  Vodă, Raluca ^a,b   Dapporto, Leonardo ^e   Dincă, Vlad ^a,c,d   Vila, Roger ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY CSIC UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^e OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CRYPSIS; FAUNA; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; MORPHOLOGY; PARADIGM SHIFT; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

EID: 84926473186     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00762     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bickford, D. et al. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 148-155.
2. Dapporto, L. and Bruschini, C. 2012. Invading a refugium: post glacial replacement of the ancestral lineage of a Nymphalid butterfly in the west Mediterranean. - Org. Divers. Evol. 12: 39-49.
3. Dapporto, L. et al. 2012. Identifying zones of phenetic compression in west Mediterranean butterflies (Satyrinae): refugia, invasion and hybridization. - Divers. Distrib. 18: 1066-1076.
4. Dasmahapatra, K. K. et al. 2010. The anatomy of a 'suture zone' in Amazonian butterflies: a coalescent-based test for vicariant geographic divergence and speciation. - Mol. Ecol. 19: 4283-4301.
5. Dennis, R. L. H. 1997. An inflated conservation load for European butterflies: increases in rarity and endemism accompany increases in species richness. - J. Insect Conserv. 1: 43-62.
6. Descimon, H. and Mallet, J. 2009. Bad species. - In: Settele, J. et al. (eds), Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 219-249.
7. Devictor, V. et al. 2012. Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. - Nat. Clim. Change 2: 121-124.
8. Dincă, V. et al. 2011. A combined genetic-morphometric analysis unravels the complex biogeographical history of Polyommatus icarus and Polyommatus celina common blue butterflies. - Mol. Ecol. 20: 3921-3935.
9. Dobrovolski, R. et al. 2012. Climatic history and dispersal ability explain the relative importance of turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21: 191-197.
10. Heliconius Genome Consortium 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptation among species. - Nature 487: 94-98.
11. Higgins, L. G. and Riley, N. D. 1970. A field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe. - Houghton Mifflin, 1st American ed.
12. Holt, B. et al. 2013. An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the World. - Science 339: 74-78.
13. Isaac, N. J. B. et al. 2004. Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 464-469.
14. Karsholt, O. and Nieukerken, E. J. van. 2013. Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea. - Fauna Europaea ver. 1.0,
15. Mallet, J. et al. 2011. Hybridisation and climate change: brown argus butterflies in Britain (Polyommatus subgenus Aricia). - Insect Conserv. Divers. 4: 192-199.
16. Marske, K. A. et al. 2013. Phylogeography: spanning the ecology-evolution continuum. - Ecography 36: 1169-1181.
17. Mayden, R. L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouncement in the saga of the species problem - In: Claridge, M. F. et al. (eds), Species: the units of biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, pp. 381-424.
18. Mercader, R. J. and Scriber, J. M. 2008. Asymmetrical thermal constraints on the parapatric species boundaries of two widespread generalist butterflies. - Ecol. Entomol. 33: 537-545.
19. Moritz, C. et al. 2009. Identification and dynamics of a cryptic suture zone in tropical rainforest. - Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1235-1244.
20. Pearman, P. B. et al. 2010. Within-taxon niche structure: niche conservatism, divergence and predicted effects of climate change. - Ecography 33: 990-1003.
21. Pfenninger, M. and Schwenk, K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. - BMC Evol. Biol. 7.
22. Pigot, A. L. and Tobias, J. A. 2013. Species interactions constrain geographic range expansion over evolutionary time. - Ecol. Lett. 16: 330-338.
23. Sañudo-Restrepo, C. P. et al. 2013. Biogeography and systematics of Aricia butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). - Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 66: 369-379
24. Steyskal, G. C. 1972. The meaning of the term "sibling species". - Syst. Zool. 21: 239.
25. Tarrier, M. R. and Delacre, J. 2008. Les papillons de jour du Maroc. - Biotope, Mèze.
26. Tennent, J. 1996. The butterflies of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. - Gem Publishing, Walling for.
27. Tshikolovets, V. V. 2011. Butterflies of Europe and the Mediterranean area - Tshikolovets Publications.
28. Waters, J. M. et al. 2013 Founder takes all: density dependent processes structure biodiversity. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 78-85.
29. Wickman, P.-O. 2009. Mating behaviour in butterflies. - In: Settele, J. et al. (eds), Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 17-28.
30. Wilkins, J. S. 2009. Species: a history of the idea. - Univ. of California Press.