Protocol for a pre-implementation and post-implementation study on shared decision-making in the surgical treatment of women with early-stage breast cancer

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Savelberg, Wilma ^a   Moser, Albine ^b   Smidt, Marjolein ^a   Boersma, Liesbeth ^a   Haekens, Christel ^a   Van Der Weijden, Trudy ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTERVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84926462128     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007698     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD005470.
2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-41.
3. Obeidat R, Finnell DS, Lally RM. Decision aids for surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer: a narrative review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:e311-21.
4. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(10):CD001431.
5. Livaudais JC, Franco R, Fei K, et al. Breast cancer treatment decision-making: are we asking too much of patients? J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:630-6.
6. Belkora JK, Loth MK, Volz S, et al. Implementing decision and communication aids to facilitate patient-centered care in breast cancer: a case study. Patient Educ Couns 2009;77:360-8.
7. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361-7.
8. Fowler FJ Jr, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:699-706.
9. Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Bennett C, et al. Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: a systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision AIDS. Med Decis Making 2012;32:E22-33.
10. Belkora JK, Volz S, Teng AE, et al. Impact of decision aids in a sustained implementation at a breast care center. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:195-204.
11. Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1067-73.
12. Belkora JK, Teng A, Volz S, et al. Expanding the reach of decision and communication aids in a breast care center: a quality improvement study. Patient Educ Couns 2011;83:234-9.
13. Pass M, Belkora J, Moore D, et al. Patient and observer ratings of physician shared decision making behaviors in breast cancer consultations. Patient Educ Couns 2012;88:93-9.
14. Lloyd A, Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, et al. Patchy 'coherence': using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC). Implement Sci 2013;8:102.
15. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, et al. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care. Wiley, 2013.
16. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 2010;341:c5146.
17. Fagerline A, Pignone M, Abhyankar P, et al. Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13(Suppl 2):S8.
18. Sawka CA, Goel V, Mahut CA, et al. Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Health Expect 1998;1:23-36.
19. Stalmeier PF, Roosmalen MS, Verhoef LC, et al. The decision evaluation scales. Patient Educ Couns 2005;57:286-93.
20. Kriston L, Scholl I, Hölzel L, et al. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns 2010;80:94-9.
21. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, et al. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:93-9.
22. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage, 2009.
23. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006.
25. O'Connor A, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D. IPDAS Collaboration Background Document. 2005.
26. Polit D, Beck C. Nursing reasearch; generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th edn. Wolters kluwer Health, 2012.
27. Johanson GA, Brooks GP. Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educ Psychol Measures 2010;70:394-400.
28. Joseph-Williams NG, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2013;94:291-309.
29. Legare F, Politi MC, Drolet R, et al. Training health professionals in shared decision-making: an international environmental scan. Patient Educ Couns 2012;88:159-69.
30. Scholl I, Kriston L, Dirmaier J, et al . Comparing the nine-item shared decision-making questionnaire to the OPTION Scale-an attempt to establish convergent validity. Health Expect 2015;18:137-50.
31. Melbourne E, Roberts S, Durand MA, et al. Dyadic OPTION: measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice. Patient Educ Couns 2011;83:55-7.
32. Elwyn G, Lloyd A, Joseph-Williams N, et al. Option grids: shared decision making made easier. Patient Educ Couns 2013;90:207-12.