Evolutionary and functional analysis of the invariant SWIM domain in the conserved Shu2/SWS1 protein family from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Homo sapiens

Genetics

Volumn 199, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1023-1033

  Godin, Stephen K ^a   Meslin, Camille ^b   Kabbinavar, Faiz ^a   Bratton Palmer, Dominique S ^a   Hornack, Christina ^a   Mihalevic, Michael J ^a   Yoshida, Kyle ^a   Sullivan, Meghan ^a   Clark, Nathan L ^a,b   Bernstein, Kara A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Budding yeast; DNA repair; Evolutionary rate covariation; Homologous recombination; Shu complex

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; REGULATOR PROTEIN; SHU2 PROTEIN; SWIM PROTEIN; SWS1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC BINDING PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEIN; SHU2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DNA DAMAGE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FUNGAL STRAIN; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; MITOTIC RECOMBINATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EUKARYOTA; GIARDIA INTESTINALIS; HOMO SAPIENS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS;

EID: 84926442468     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.173518     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alvaro, D., M. Lisby, and R. Rothstein, 2007 Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet. 3: e228
2. Balakrishnan, R., J. Park, K. Karra, B. C. Hitz, G. Binkley et al., 2012 YeastMine—an integrated data warehouse for Saccharomyces cerevisiae data as a multi-purpose tool-kit. Database 2012: bar062
3. Ball, L. G., K. Zhang, J. A. Cobb, C. Boone, and W. Xiao, 2009 The yeast Shu complex couples error-free post-replication repair to homologous recombination. Mol. Microbiol. 73: 89–102
4. Banerjee, R., D. Y. Dubois, J. Gauthier, S. X. Lin, S. Roy et al., 2004 The zinc-binding site of a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is a SWIM domain that modulates amino acid binding via the tRNA acceptor arm. Eur. J. Biochem. 271: 724–733
5. Bernstein, K. A., R. J. Reid, I. Sunjevaric, K. Demuth, R. C. Burgess et al., 2011 The Shu complex, which contains Rad51 paralogues, promotes DNA repair through inhibition of the Srs2 anti-recombinase. Mol. Biol. Cell 22: 1599–1607
6. Burgess, R. C., M. Lisby, V. Altmannova, L. Krejci, P. Sung et al., 2009 Localization of recombination proteins and Srs2 reveals anti-recombinase function in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 185: 969–981
7. Chintapalli, S. V., G. Bhardwaj, J. Babu, L. Hadjiyianni, Y. Hong et al., 2013 Reevaluation of the evolutionary events within recA/RAD51 phylogeny. BMC Genomics 14: 240
8. Clark, N. L., E. Alani, and C. F. Aquadro, 2012 Evolutionary rate covariation reveals shared functionality and coexpression of genes. Genome Res. 22: 714–720
9. Clark, N. L., E. Alani, and C. F. Aquadro, 2013 Evolutionary rate covariation in meiotic proteins results from fluctuating evolutionary pressure in yeasts and mammals. Genetics 193: 529–538
10. Clark, N. L., and C. F. Aquadro, 2010 A novel method to detect proteins evolving at correlated rates: identifying new functional relationships between coevolving proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 1152–1161
11. Clark, N. L., J. Gasper, M. Sekino, S. A. Springer, C. F. Aquadro et al., 2009 Coevolution of interacting fertilization proteins. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000570
12. DiRuggiero, J., J. R. Brown, A. P. Bogert, and F. T. Robb, 1999 DNA repair systems in archaea: mementos from the last universal common ancestor? J. Mol. Evol. 49: 474–484
13. Edgar, R. C., 2004 MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 1792–1797
14. Filippini, S. E., and A. Vega, 2013 Breast cancer genes: beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 Front. Biosci. 18: 1358–1372 (Landmark Ed).
15. Findlay, G. D., J. L. Sitnik, W. Wang, C. F. Aquadro, N. L. Clark et al., 2014 Evolutionary rate covariation identifies new members of a protein network required for Drosophila melanogaster female post-mating responses. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004108
16. Godin, S., A. Wier, F. Kabbinavar, D. S. Bratton-Palmer, H. Ghodke et al., 2013 The Shu complex interacts with Rad51 through the Rad51 paralogues Rad55-Rad57 to mediate error-free recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: 4525–4534
17. Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel, 2003 A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696–704
18. Heyer, W. D., K. T. Ehmsen, and J. Liu, 2010 Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 44: 113–139
19. Hong, S., and K. P. Kim, 2013 Shu1 promotes homolog bias of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cells 36: 446–454
20. Huang, M. E., A. G. Rio, A. Nicolas, and R. D. Kolodner, 2003 A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 11529–11534
21. Ito, T., T. Chiba, R. Ozawa, M. Yoshida, and M. Hattori, 2001 A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 4569–4574
22. James, P., J. Halladay, and E. A. Craig, 1996 Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144: 1425–1436
23. Janke, C., M. M. Magiera, N. Rathfelder, C. Taxis, S. Reber et al., 2004 A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21: 947–962
24. Kawabata, M., T. Kawabata, and M. Nishibori, 2005 Role of recA/ RAD51 family proteins in mammals. ActaMed. Okayama 59: 1–9
25. Komori, K., T. Miyata, J. DiRuggiero, R. Holley-Shanks, I. Hayashi et al., 2000 Both RadA and RadB are involved in homologous recombination in Pyrococcus furiosus. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 33782–33790
26. Krejci, L., S. Van Komen, Y. Li, J. Villemain, M. S. Reddy et al., 2003 DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423: 305–309
27. Lea, D. E., and C. A. Coulson, 1949 The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49: 264–285
28. Lin, Z., H. Kong, M. Nei, and H. Ma, 2006 Origins and evolution of the recA/RAD51 gene family: evidence for ancient gene duplication and endosymbiotic gene transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 10328–10333
29. Liu, J., Y. Gagnon, J. Gauthier, L. Furenlid, P. J. L’Heureux et al., 1995 The zinc-binding site of Escherichia coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase is located in the acceptor-binding domain: studies by extended x-ray absorption fine structure, molecular modeling, and site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 15162–15169
30. Liu, T., L. Wan, Y. Wu, J. Chen, and J. Huang, 2011 hSWS1 SWSAP1 is an evolutionarily conserved complex required for efficient homologous recombination repair. J. Biol. Chem. 286: 41758–41766
31. Makarova, K. S., L. Aravind, and E. V. Koonin, 2002 SWIM, a novel Zn-chelating domain present in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27: 384–386
32. Mankouri, H. W., H. P. Ngo, and I. D. Hickson, 2007 Shu proteins promote the formation of homologous recombination intermediates that are processed by Sgs1-Rmi1-Top3 Mol. Biol. Cell 18: 4062–4073
33. Martin, V., C. Chahwan, H. Gao, V. Blais, J. Wohlschlegel et al., 2006 Sws1 is a conserved regulator of homologous recombination in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J. 25: 2564–2574
34. Park, D. J., F. Lesueur, T. Nguyen-Dumont, M. Pertesi, F. Odefrey et al., 2012 Rare mutations in XRCC2 increase the risk of breast cancer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90: 734–739
35. Pennington, K. P., and E. M. Swisher, 2012 Hereditary ovarian cancer: beyond the usual suspects. Gynecol. Oncol. 124: 347–353
36. Rong, L., F. Palladino, A. Aguilera, and H. L. Klein, 1991 The hyper-gene conversion hpr5-1 mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an allele of the SRS2/RADH gene. Genetics 127: 75–85
37. Sasanuma, H., Y. Furihata, M. Shinohara, and A. Shinohara, 2013a Remodeling of the Rad51 DNA strand-exchange protein by the Srs2 helicase. Genetics 194: 859–872
38. Sasanuma, H., M. S. Tawaramoto, J. P. Lao, H. Hosaka, E. Sanda et al., 2013b A new protein complex promoting the assembly of Rad51 filaments. Nat. Commun. 4: 1676
39. Sato, T., Y. Yamanishi, M. Kanehisa, and H. Toh, 2005 The inference of protein-protein interactions by co-evolutionary analysis is improved by excluding the information about the phylogenetic relationships. Bioinformatics 21: 3482–3489
40. Schild, D., Y. C. Lio, D. W. Collins, T. Tsomondo, and D. J. Chen, 2000 Evidence for simultaneous protein interactions between human Rad51 paralogs. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 16443–16449
41. Shamseldin, H. E., M. Elfaki, and F. S. Alkuraya, 2012 Exome sequencing reveals a novel Fanconi group defined by XRCC2 mutation. J. Med. Genet. 49: 184–186
42. She, Z., Z. Q. Gao, Y. Liu, W. J. Wang, G. F. Liu et al., 2012 Structural and SAXS analysis of the budding yeast SHU-complex proteins. FEBS Lett. 586: 2306–2312
43. Shepherd, R., S. A. Forbes, D. Beare, S. Bamford, C. G. Cole et al., 2011 Data mining using the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer BioMart. Database 2011: bar018
44. Sherman, F., G. R. Fink, and J. B. Hicks, 1986 Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
45. Shor, E., J. Weinstein, and R. Rothstein, 2005 A genetic screen for top3 suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies SHU1, SHU2, PSY3, and CSM2: four genes involved in error-free DNA repair. Genetics 169: 1275–1289
46. Somyajit, K., S. Subramanya, and G. Nagaraju, 2012 Distinct roles of FANCO/RAD51C protein in DNA damage signaling and repair: implications for Fanconi anemia and breast cancer susceptibility. J. Biol. Chem. 287: 3366–3380
47. St. Pierre S.E., L. Ponting, R. Stefancsik, and P. McQuilton, 2014 FlyBase 102—advanced approaches to interrogating Fly- Base. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: D780–D788
48. Sung, P., 1997 Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins forma heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11: 1111–1121
49. Suwaki, N., K. Klare, and M. Tarsounas, 2011 RAD51 paralogs: roles in DNA damage signalling, recombinational repair and tumorigenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22: 898–905
50. Takata, M., M. S. Sasaki, S. Tachiiri, T. Fukushima, E. Sonoda et al., 2001 Chromosome instability and defective recombinational repair in knockout mutants of the five Rad51 paralogs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 2858–2866
51. Tao, Y., X. Li, Y. Liu, J. Ruan, S. Qi et al., 2012 Structural analysis of Shu proteins reveals a DNA binding role essential for resisting damage. J. Biol. Chem. 287: 20231–20239
52. Thomas, B. J., and R. Rothstein, 1989 Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56: 619–630
53. Vaz, F., H. Hanenberg, B. Schuster, K. Barker, C. Wiek et al., 2010 Mutation of the RAD51C gene in a Fanconi anemia-like disorder. Nat. Genet. 42: 406–409
54. Veaute, X., J. Jeusset, C. Soustelle, S. C. Kowalczykowski, E. Le Cam et al., 2003 The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423: 309–312
55. Wilson, R. J., J. L. Goodman, and V. B. Strelets, 2008 FlyBase: integration and improvements to query tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: D588–D593
56. Xu, X., L. Ball, W. Chen, X. Tian, A. Lambrecht et al., 2013 The yeast Shu complex utilizes homologous recombination machinery for error-free lesion bypass via physical interaction with a Rad51 paralogue. PLoS ONE 8: e81371
57. Yang, Z., 2007 PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1586–1591
58. Zhao, X., E. G. Muller, and R. Rothstein, 1998 A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2: 329–340.