Hysterosalpingography: Techniques, Normal Anatomy, and Pitfalls

Gynecologic Imaging

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 113-123

  Brubaker, Lauren M ^a   Clark, Richard L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HOSPITALS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926432793     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4377-1575-0.10007-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates 2006. US Department of Health and Human Services and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. . Accessed date 5/20/09. http://www.cdc.gov/ART/.
2. Watson A., Vandekerckhove P., Lilford R., et al. A meta-analysis of the therapeutic role of oil soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography: a surprising result?. Fertil Steril 1994, 61:470-477.
3. Rasmussen F., Lindequist S., Larsen C., et al. Therapeutic effect of hysterosalpingography: oil- versus water-soluble contrast media-a randomized prospective study. Radiology 1992, 185:283-284.
4. Johnson N., Vandekerckhove P., Watson A., et al. Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, 2:CD003718.
5. Luttjeboer F., Harada T., Hughes E., et al. Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 3:CD003718.
6. Steiner A.Z., Meyer W.R., Clark R.L., et al. Oil-soluble contrast during hysterosalpingography in women with proven tubal patency. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 101:109-113.
7. Berek J., Novak E. Berek & Novak's gynecology 2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. ed 14.
8. Katzberg R.W. The contrast media manual 1992, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
9. ACR Contrast Media Guidelines. . Accessed 5/20/09. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories%2fquality_safety%2fguidelines%2fdx%2fiv_contrast.aspx.
10. Katayama H., Yamaguchi K., Kozuka T. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology 1990, 175:621-628.
11. De Caro G., Ferraiolo A., Castelletti L., et al. Hysterosalpingography with gadolinium. Eur Radiol 2005, 15:1469-1471.
12. Cohen S.B., Wattiez A., Seidman D.S., et al. Comparison of cervical vacuum cup cannula with metal cannula for hysterosalpingography. BJOG 2001, 108:1031-1035.
13. Tur-Kaspa I., Seidman D.S., Soriano D., et al. Hysterosalpingography with a balloon catheter versus a metal cannula: a prospective, randomized, blinded comparative study. Hum Reprod 1998, 13:75-77.
14. Ricci G., Guastalla P., Ammar L., et al. Balloon catheter vs. cervical vacuum cup for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Fertil Steril 2007, 87:1458-1467.
15. Lindequist S., Justesen P., Larsen C., et al. Diagnostic quality and complications of hysterosalpingography: oil- versus water-soluble contrast media-a randomized prospective study. Radiology 1991, 179:69-74.
16. ACR Guidelines for Techniques: Hysterosalpingograhy. . Accessed 5/20/09. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/genit/hysterosalpingography.aspx.
17. Lindheim S.R., Sprague C., Winter T.C. Hysterosalpingography and sonohysterography: lessons in technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:24-29.
18. San Fillippo J.S., Yussman M.A., Smith D. Hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of infertility: a six year review. Fertil Steril 1978, 30:636.
19. Winfield A.C., Wentz A.C. Diagnostic imaging of infertility 1992, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. ed 2.
20. Yoder I.C. Hysterosalpingography and pelvic ultrasound: imaging in infertility and gynecology 1988, Boston, Little Brown.
21. Kramer R., Khoury H.J., Lopes C., et al. Equivalent dose to organs and tissues in hysterosalpingography calculated with the FAX (Female Adult voXel) phantom. Br J Radiol 2006, 79:893-898.
22. Holst N., Abyholm T., Borgersen A. Hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of infertility. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1983, 24:253-257.
23. Duff DE, Fried AM, Wilson EA, et al: Hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy: a comparative study, AJR Am J Roentgenol 198;141:761-763.
24. Kerner T.C., Clark R.L., Yankaskas B.C., et al. Post-ligation dilatation of the fallopian tube. Invest Radiol 1984, 19:213.