Change point testing in logistic regression models with interaction term

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1483-1494

  Fong, Youyi ^a   Di, Chongzhi ^a   Permar, Sallie ^b  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Change point testing; Effect modification; Maximum of likelihood ratios; Maximum of scores; Mother to child transmission of HIV 1

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST FEEDING; CALCULATION; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS 1 INFECTION; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFECTION RISK; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PREGNANCY; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; VERTICAL TRANSMISSION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS 1; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; IMMUNOLOGY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRANSMISSION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EFFECT MODIFIER, EPIDEMIOLOGIC; HIV INFECTIONS; HIV-1; HUMANS; INFECTIOUS DISEASE TRANSMISSION, VERTICAL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHOD;

EID: 84926419464     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6419     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Haynes BF, Gilbert PB, McElrath MJ, Zolla-Pazner S, Tomaras GD, Alam SM, Evans DT, Montefiori DC, Karnasuta C, Sutthent R, Liao Hua-Xin, DeVico AL, Lewis GK, Williams C, Pinter A, Fong Y, Janes H, DeCamp A, Huang Y, Rao M, Billings E, Karasavvas N, Robb ML, Ngauy V, deSouza MS, Paris R, Ferrari G, Bailer RT, Soderberg KA, Andrews C, Berman PW, Frahm N, DeRosa SC, Alpert MD, Yates NL, Shen X, Koup RA, Pitisuttithum P, Kaewkungwal J, Nitayaphan S, Rerks-Ngarm S, Michael NL, Kim JH. Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 366(14):1275-1286.
2. Permar SR, Fong Y, Vandergrift N, Fouda GG, Gilbert P, Parks R, Frederick JH, Pollara J, Martelli A, Liebl B, Lloyd K, Yates N, Overman G, Shen X, Whitaker K, Chen H, Pritchett J, Solomon E, Friberg E, Gurley TC, Holle TarraVon, Martinez D, Cai F, Lauzao R, Wilkes S, Datta S, Sarzotti-Kelsoe M, Liao HX, Gao F, Ferrari G, Alam SM, Moody MA, Montefiori DC, Denny T, Tomaras G, Haynes BF. Maternal HIV-1 envelope variable region 3-specific IgG responses are a correlate of risk of perinatal transmission 2014; submitted.
3. Davies RB. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 1977; 64(2):247-254.
4. Davies RB. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 1987; 74(1):33-43.
5. Davies R. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative: linear model case. Biometrika 2002; 89(2):484-489.
6. Ulm K. A statistical method for assessing a threshold in epidemiological studies. Statistics in Medicine 1991; 10(3):341-349.
7. Koziol JA, Wu SCH. Changepoint statistics for assessing a treatment-covariate interaction. Biometrics 1996; 52(3):1147-1152.
8. Xu R, Adak S. Survival analysis with time-varying regression effects using a tree-based approach. Biometrics 2002; 58(2):305-315.
9. Mazumdar M, Smith A, Bacik J. Methods for categorizing a prognostic variable in a multivariable setting. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22(4):559-571.
10. Pastor-Barriuso R, Guallar E, Coresh J. Transition models for change-point estimation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22(7):1141-1162.
11. Antoch J, Gregoire G, Jarušková D. Detection of structural changes in generalized linear models. Statistics & Probability Letters 2004; 69(3):315-332.
12. Zheng G, Chen Z. Comparison of maximum statistics for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrics 2005; 61(1):254-258.
13. Vexler A, Gurevich G. Average most powerful tests for a segmented regression. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 2009; 38(13):2214-2231.
14. Lee S, Seo MH, Shin Y. Testing for threshold effects in regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2011; 106(493):220-231.
15. Rich KC, Fowler MG, Mofenson LM, Abboud R, Pitt J, Diaz C, Hanson IC, Cooper E, Mendez H, and for the Women and Infants Transmission Study Group . Maternal and infant factors predicting disease progression in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected infants. Pediatrics 2000; 105(1):e8.
16. Ayyavoo V, Ugen KE, Fernandes LS, Goedert JJ, Rubinstein A, Williams WV, Weiner DB. Analysis of genetic heterogeneity, antigenicity, and biological characteristics of HIV-1 in a maternal transmitter and nontransmitter patient pair. DNA Cell Biology July 1996; 15(7):571-580.
17. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1995; 57(1):289-300.
18. Li M, Gao F, Mascola JR, Stamatatos L, Polonis VR, Koutsoukos M, Voss G, Goepfert P, Gilbert P, Greene, KM . Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 env clones from acute and early subtype b infections for standardized assessments of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies. Journal of Virology 2005; 79(16):10108-10125.
19. Banerjee M, McKeague IW. Confidence sets for split points in decision trees. The Annals of Statistics 2007; 35(2):543-574.
20. Mallik A, Sen B, Banerjee M, Michailidis G. Threshold estimation based on a p-value framework in dose-response and regression settings. Biometrika 2011; 98(4):887-900.
21. Neyman J. Contribution to the theory of sampling human populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1938; 33(201):101-116.
22. Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 1986; 73(1):1-11.
23. Self SG, Prentice RL. Asymptotic distribution theory and efficiency results for case-cohort studies. The Annals of Statistics 1988; 16(1):64-81.
24. Breslow NE, Holubkov R. Maximum likelihood estimation of logistic regression parameters under two-phase, outcome-dependent sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1997; 59(2):447-461.