Significance of the cribriform pattern in prostatic adenocarcinomas

Pathology Research and Practice

Volumn 210, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 554-557

  Sarbay, Billur Cosan ^a   Kir, Gozde ^a   Topal, Cumhur Selcuk ^a   Gumus, Eyup ^a  

^a Umraniye Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cribriform pattern; Extraprostatic extension; Gleason score; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; HUMAN; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM GRADING; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84926419326     PISSN: 03440338     EISSN: 16180631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Qian J., Jenkins R.B., Bostwick D.G. Detection of chromosomal anomalies and c-myc gene amplification in the cribriform pattern of prostatic intraepitelial neoplasia and carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mod. Pathol. 1997, 10:1113-1119.
2. Epstein J.I., Allsbrook W.C., Amin M.B., Egevad L.L. ISUP Grading committee: the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005, 29:1228-1242.
3. Latour M., Amin M.B., Billis A., et al. Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008, 32:1532-1539.
4. Epstein J.I. An update of the Gleason grading system. J. Urol. 2010, 183:433-440.
5. Lotan T.L., Epstein J.I. Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010, 7:136-142.
6. Qian J., Wollan P., Bostwick D.G. The extent and multicentricity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 1997, 28:143-148.
7. Magi-Galluzzi C., Evans A.J., Delahunt B., et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24:26-38.
8. Berney D.M., Wheeler T.M., Grignon D.J., et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24:39-47.
9. Tan P.H., Cheng L., Srigley J.R., et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24:48-57.
10. Martinez-Rodriguez M., Ramos D., Mayordomo E., Soriano P., Llombart-Bosch A. Analysis of cribriform Gleason grade 3 in prostatic carcinoma. A histopathological and immunohistochemical study of 32 cases. Histopathology 2007, 51:717-719.
11. Iczkowski K.A., Torkko K.C., Kotnis G.R., et al. Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011, 136:98-107.
12. Kryvenko O.N., Gupta N.S., Virani N., et al. Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2013, 137:610-617.