An identification key for selecting methods for sustainability assessments

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 2490-2512

  Zijp, Michiel C ^a,b,c   Heijungs, Reinout ^b,d   van der Voet, Ester ^b   van de Meent, Dik ^a,c   Huijbregts, Mark A J ^c   Hollander, Anne ^a   Posthuma, Leo ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aggregation; Identification key; Indicator selection; Method selection; Sustainability assessment; Sustainability assessment tools; Sustainability question

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; IDENTIFICATION KEY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84926389079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su7032490     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hoekstra, A.Y.; Wiedmann, T.O. Humanity's unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 2014, 344, 1114-1117.
2. Waas, T.; Hugé, J.; Block, T.; Wright, T.; Benitez-Capistros, F.; Verbruggen, A. Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability 2014, 6, 5512-5534.
3. ICLEI. Sustainable cities. Available online: http://www.sustainablecities.eu (accessed on 9 April 2014).
4. UN. Outcome Document of Rio+20 Conference; United Nations: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2012.
5. EC. Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the Use of Common Methods to Measure and Communicate the Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, 56, 1-210.
6. EC. European innovation partnership "agricultural productivity and sustainability". Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eip/index_en.htm (accessed on 9 April 2014).
7. Gasparatos, A.; Scolobig, A. Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 80, 1-7.
8. Sala, S.; Ciuffo, B.; Nijkamp, P. A Meta-Framework for Sustainability Assessment; Free University of Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.
9. Özdemir, E.D.; Härdtlein, M.; Jenssen, T.; Zech, D.; Eltrop, L. A confusion of tongues or the art of aggregating indicators-Reflections on four projective methodologies on sustainability measurement. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 2385-2396.
10. Browne, D.; O'Regan, B.; Moles, R. Comparison of energy flow accounting, energy flow metabolism ratio analysis and ecological footprinting as tools for measuring urban sustainability: A case-study of an irish city-region. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 83, 97-107.
11. De Ridder, W. Sustainabilitya-Test Inception Report: Progress to Date and Future Tasks. Available online: http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/555000001.pdf (accessed on 30 November 2014)
12. Singh, R.K.; Murty, H.R.; Gupta, S.K.; Dikshit, A.K. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 15, 281-299.
13. Wrisberg, N.; Udo de Haes, H.A.; Triebswetter, U.; Eder, P.; Clift, R. Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a Systems Perspective; Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2000.
14. Finnveden, G.; Moberg, A. Environmental systems analysis tools-an overview. J. Cleaner Prod. 2005, 13, 1165-1173.
15. Sala, S.; Farioli, F.; Zamagni, A. Progress in sustainability science: Lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18, 1653-1672.
16. Hacking, T.; Guthrie, P. A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28, 73-89.
17. Udo de Haes, H.A.; Sleeswijk, A.W.; Heijungs, R. Similarities, differences and synergisms between hera and lca-an analysis at three levels. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2006, 12, 431-449.
18. Ness, B.; Urbel-Piirsalu, E.; Anderberg, S.; Olsson, L. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 60, 498-508.
19. De Ridder, W.; Turnpenny, J.; Nilsson, M.; von Raggamby, A. A framework for tool selection and use in integrated assessment for sustainable development. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manag. 2007, 9, 423-441.
20. Van Passel, S.; Meul, M. Multilevel and multi-user sustainability assessment of farming systems. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2012, 32, 170-180.
21. Florin, M.J.; van Ittersum, M.K.; van de Ven, G.W.J. Selecting the sharpest tools to explore the food-feed-fuel debate: Sustainability assessment of family farmers producing food, feed and fuel in brazil. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 20, 108-120.
22. Binder, C.R.; Feola, G.; Steinberger, J.K. Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2010, 30, 71-81.
23. Carof, M.; Colomb, B.; Aveline, A. A guide for choosing the most appropriate method for multi-criteria assessment of agricultural systems according to decision-makers' expectations. Agric. Syst. 2013, 115, 51-62.
24. Pope, J.; Annandale, D.; Morrison-Saunders, A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2004, 24, 595-616.
25. Schneider, A.G.; Townsend-Small, A.; Rosso, D. Impact of direct greenhouse gas emissions on the carbon footprint of water reclamation processes employing nitrification-denitrification. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 505, 1166-1173.
26. Nickerson, R.C.; Varshney, U.; Muntermann, J. A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2013, 22, 336-359.
27. Bailey, K.D. Typologies and Taxonomies-An Introduction to Classification Techniques; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994.
28. Peters, I. Folksonomies: Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0; De Gruyter, Saur: Berlin, Germany, 2009.
29. Kendal, S.; Creen, M. An Introduction to Knowledge Engineering, Springer: London, UK, 2007.
30. Dijkers, M.P.; Hart, T.; Tsaousides, T.; Whyte, J.; Zanca, J.M. Treatment taxonomy for rehabilitation: Past, present, and prospects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 95, S6-S16.
31. Sala, S.; Farioli, F.; Zamagni, A. Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18, 1686-1697.
32. Jeswani, H.K.; Azapagic, A.; Schepelmann, P.; Ritthoff, M. Options for broadening and deepening the lca approaches. J. Cleaner Prod. 2010, 18, 120-127.
33. Parris, T.M.; Kates, R.W. Characterizing and Measuring Sustainable Development. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 2003, 28, 559-586.
34. Mayer, A.L. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environ. Int. 2008, 34, 277-291.
35. Böhringer, C.; Jochem, P.E.P. Measuring the immeasurable-A survey of sustainability indices. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 1-8.
36. Gasparatos, A.; El-Haram, M.; Horner, M. A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28, 286-311.
37. Joumard, R. Environmental sustainability assessments: Towards a new framework. Int. J. Sustain. Soc. 2011, 3, 133-150.
38. Bond, A.J.; Morrison-Saunders, A. Re-evaluating sustainability assessment: Aligning the vision and the practice. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2011, 31, 1-7.
39. Dietz, S.; Neumayer, E. Weak and strong sustainability in the seea: Concepts and measurement. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 617-626.
40. Robèrt, K.H.; Schmidt-Bleek, B.; Aloisi De Larderel, J.; Basile, G.; Jansen, J.L.; Kuehr, R.; Price Thomas, P.; Suzuki, M.; Hawken, P.; Wackernagel, M. Strategic sustainable development-selection, design and synergies of applied tools. J. Cleaner Prod. 2002, 10, 197-214.
41. Svarstad, H.; Petersen, L.K.; Rothman, D.; Siepel, H.; Wätzold, F. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework dpsir. Land Use Policy 2008, 25, 116-125.
42. De Schryver, A.M.; van Zelm, R.; Humbert, S.; Pfister, S.; McKone, T.E.; Huijbregts, M.A.J. Value choices in life cycle impact assessment of stressors causing human health damage. J. Ind. Ecol. 2011, 15, 796-815.
43. Zoeteman, K. Sustainability of nations. Tracing stages of sustainable development of nations with integrated indicators. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2001, 8, 93-109.
44. Thabrew, L.; Wiek, A.; Ries, R. Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: Applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. J. Cleaner Prod. 2009, 17, 67-76.
45. Pintér, L.; Hardi, P.; Martinuzzi, A.; Hall, J. Bellagio stamp: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 17, 20-28.
46. Olsen, S.I.; Christensen, F.M.; Hauschild, M.; Pedersen, F.; Larsen, H.F.; Tørsløv, J. Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemicals-A methodological comparison. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2001, 21, 385-404.
47. OECD. Oecd Environmental Indicators-Development, Measurement and Use; OECD: Paris, France, 2003.
48. Niemeijer, D.; de Groot, R.S. Framing environmental indicators: Moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2008, 10, 89-106.
49. Blok, K.; Huijbregts, M.; Roes, L.; van Haaster, B.; Patel, M.; Hertwich, E.; Wood, R.; Hauschild, M.; Sellke, P.; Antunes, P.; et al. A Novel Methodology for the Sustainability Impact Assessment of New Technologies; Copernicus Institute: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2013.
50. Niemeijer, D.; de Groot, R.S. A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 8, 14-25.
51. Mata, T.M.; Martins, A.A.; Neto, B.; Martins, M.L.; Salcedo, R.L.R.; Costa, C.A.V. Lca tool for sustainability evaluations in the pharmaceutical industry. Mech. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2012, 26, 261-266.
52. Ibáñez-Forés, V.; Bovea, M.D.; Azapagic, A. Assessing the sustainability of best available techniques (bat): Methodology and application in the ceramic tiles industry. J. Cleaner Prod. 2013, 51, 162-176.
53. Traverso, M.; Asdrubali, F.; Francia, A.; Finkbeiner, M. Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: An implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2012, 17, 1068-1079.