Using Semantic Cues to Learn Syntax

Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 902-907

  Naseem, Tahira ^a   Barzilay, Regina ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SEMANTICS;

DEPENDENCY GRAMMAR; GRAMMAR INDUCTION; GRAPHICAL MODEL; LEARN+; NONLOCAL; SEMANTIC CUES; SEMANTIC PREDICATES; SEMANTIC RELATIONS; SEMANTIC STRUCTURES; SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84926375490     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bies, A.; Ferguson, M.; Katz, K.; MacIntyre, R.; Tredinnick, V.; Kim, G.; Marcinkiewicz, M.; and Schasberger, B. 1995. Bracketing Guidelines for Treebank II Style Penn Treebank project. University of Pennsylvania.
2. Blunsom, P., and Cohn, T. 2010. Unsupervised Induction of Tree Substitution Grammars for Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 1204-1213.
3. Druck, G.; Mann, G.; and McCallum, A. 2009. Semi-supervised Learning of Dependency Parsers using Generalized Expectation Criteria. In Proceedings of ACL/IJCNLP, 360-368.
4. Ge, R., and Mooney, R. 2009. Learning a Compositional Semantic Parser Using an Existing Syntactic Parser. In Proceedings of ACL/IJCNLP, 611-619.
5. Ghosh, D., and Goddeau, D. 1998. Automatic Grammar Induction from Semantic Parsing. In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
6. Headden III, W. P.; Johnson, M.; and McClosky, D. 2009. Improving unsupervised dependency parsing with richer contexts and smoothing. In Proceedings of NAACL/HLT, 101-109.
7. Johansson, R., and Nugues, P. 2007. Extended Constituent-to-dependency Conversion for English. In Proceedings of NODALIDA, 105-112.
8. Johnson, M.; Griffiths, T.; and Goldwater, S. 2007. Bayesian Inference for PCFGs via Markov Chain Monte Carlo. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 139-146.
9. Klein, D., and Manning, C. 2004. Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure: Models of dependency and constituency. In Proceedings of ACL, 478-485.
10. Marcus, M. P.; Santorini, B.; and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational Linguistics 19(2):313-330.
11. Mintz, M.; Bills, S.; Snow, R.; and Jurafsky, D. 2009. Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In Proceedings of ACL/IJCNLP, 1003-1011.
12. Naseem, T.; Chen, H.; Barzilay, R.; and Johnson, M. 2010. Using Universal Linguistic Knowledge to Guide Grammar Induction. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
13. Pereira, F., and Schabes, Y. 1992. Inside-Outside Reestimation from Partially Bracketed Corpora. In Proceedings of ACL, 128-135.
14. Piantadosi, S.; Goodman, N.; Ellis, B.; and Tenenbaum, J. 2008. A Bayesian model of the acquisition of compositional semantics. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
15. Poon, H., and Domingos, P. 2009. Unsupervised Semantic Parsing. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 1-10.
16. Spitkovsky, V. I.; Jurafsky, D.; and Alshawi, H. 2010. Profiting from Mark-Up: Hyper-Text Annotations for Guided Parsing. In Proceedings of ACL, 1278-1287.
17. Toutanova, K., and Manning, C. 2000. Enriching the Knowledge Sources Used in a Maximum Entropy Part-of-speech Tagger. In Proceedings of EMNLP/VLC, 63-70.
18. Walker, C.; Strassel, S.; Medero, J.; and Maeda, K. 2006. Ace 2005 Multilingual Training Corpus. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
19. Wu, F., and Weld, D. 2010. Open Information Extraction Using Wikipedia. In Proceedings of ACL.