A reactive-deliberative model of dialogue agency

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1193, Issue , 2015, Pages 157-171

  Traum, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REPAIR; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

MENTAL STATE; MULTIAGENT PLANS; PLAN EXECUTION; RATIONAL AGENCY; STANDARD MODEL;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 84926368406     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. James E Allen and C. Raymond Perrault. Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15(3):143-178, 1980.
2. James. E Allen, L. K. Schubert, G. Ferguson, P. Heeman, C. H. Hwang, T. Kato, M. Light, N. Martin, B. Miller, M. Poesio, and D. R. Traum. The TRAINS project: a case study in building a conversational planning agent. Journal ofExperimentaland TheoreticalArtificial Intelligence, 7:7-48, 1995.
3. Cecile T. Balkanski. Modelling act-type relations in collaborative activity. Technical Report 23-90, Harvard University Center for Research in Computing Technology, 1990.
4. Jon Barwise. The Situation in Logic, chapter 9: On the Model Theory of Common Knowledge. CSLI Lecture Notes: Number 17. Center for The Study of Language and Information, 1989.
5. Michael E. Bratman, David J. Israel, and Martha E. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349-355, 1988.
6. P. Bretier and M. D. Sadek. A rational agent as the kernel of a cooperative spoken dialogue system: Implementing a logical theory of interaction. In J. P. Mailer, M. J. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents Ili -- Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996. In this volume.
7. Herbert H. Clark. Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press, 1992.
8. Herbert H. Clark and Edward E Schaefer. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13:259-294, 1989. Also appears as Chapter 5 in [7].
9. Phillip R. Cohen and Hector J. Levesque. Confirmations and joint action. In Proceedings IJCAI-91, pages 951-957, 1991.
10. Phillip R. Cohen and C. R. Perrault. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3(3):177-212, 1979.
11. E Dignum and B. van Linder. Modeling social agents: Communication as action. In J. E M011er, M. J. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings, editors, IntelligentAgents III-- Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL- 96), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996. In this volume.
12. Alvin I. Goldman. A Theory of Human Action. Prentice Hall Inc., 1970.
13. Barbara J. Grosz and Sarit Kraus. Collaborative plans for group activities. In Proceedings IJCAL93, pages 367-373, 1993.
14. Barbara J. Grosz and Candace L. Sidner. Plans for discourse. In E R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, 1990.
15. J. Y. Halpern and Y. Moses. Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. Journalofthe ACM, 37(3):549-587, 1990.
16. Jerry Hobbs. Ontological promiscuity. In ProceedingsACL-85, pages 61-69, 1985.
17. L. Thorne McCarty. Permissions and obligations: An informal introduction. Technical Report LRP-TR- 19, Dept. of Computer Science, Rutgers University, 1986.
18. Martha E. Pollack. Plans as complex mental attitudes. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, 1990.
19. Martha E. Pollack. Inferring Domain Plans in Question-Answering. PhD thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, May 1986.
20. Yoav Shoham and Moshe Tennenholtz. On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies. In ProceedingsAAAl-92, pages 276-281, 1992.
21. David R. Traum. A Computational Theory of Grounding in Natural Language Conversation. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, 1994. Also available as TR 545, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
22. David R. Traum and James E Allen. A speech acts approach to grounding in conversation. In Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-92), pages 137-40, October 1992.
23. David R. Traum and James F. Allen. Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. In Proceedings of the 32 th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1-8, 1994.
24. David R. Traum and James F. Allen. Towards a formal theory of repair in plan execution and plan recognition. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop of the UK Planning and Scheduling Special Interest Group, September 1994.
25. David R. Traum and Elizabeth A. Hinkelman. Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue. Computational Intelligence, 8(3):575-599, 1992. Special Issue on Non-literal language.
26. David R. Traum, L. K. Schubert, M. Poesio, N.G. Martin, M. Light, C. H. Hwang, P. Heeman, G. Ferguson, and J. E Allen. Knowledge representation in the TRAINS-93 conversation system. International Journal of Expert Systems, to appear 1996.
27. G. H. yon Wright. Deontic logic. Mind, 60:1-15, 1951.