Rethinking ‘classical physics’

The Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 721-764

  Gooday, Graeme ^a   Mitchell, Daniel Jon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classical physics; Electrocapillarity; Electromagnetic waves; Ether; Experimental physics; Industry; Max planck; Modern physics; Richard staley; X rays

Indexed keywords

CIRCULAR WAVEGUIDES; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES; ETHERS; INDUSTRY;

CLASSICAL PHYSICS; ELECTROCAPILLARITY; EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS; MAX PLANCK; MODERN PHYSICS; RICHARD STALEY;

X RAYS;

EID: 84926359667     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696253.013.25     Document Type: Chapter

References (157)

1. Richard Staley, Einstein’s Generation: The Origins of the Relativity Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008)
2. Allan A. Needell, ‘Irreversibility and the Failure of Classical Dynamics: Max Planck’s Work on the Quantum Theory, 1900-1915’ (Yale University: Unpublished Ph.D. Diss., 1980)
3. Allan A. Needell, ‘Introduction’, in Max Planck, The Theory of Heat Radiation (Los Angeles: Tomash; New York: American Institute of Physics, 1988), pp. xi-xlv
4. Olivier Darrigol, From c-Numbers to q-Numbers: The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory (Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992)
5. Olivier Darrigol, ‘The Historians’ Disagreements over the Meaning of Planck’s Quantum’, Centaurus, 43 (2001), pp. 219-239.
6. Jed Z. Buchwald, From Maxwell to Microphysics: Aspects of Electromagnetic Theory in the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth Century (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1985)
7. Oliver Darrigol, Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
8. Terry Quinn, From Artefacts to Atoms: The BIPM and the Search for Ultimate Measurement Standards (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
9. Suman Seth, ‘Crisis and the Construction of Modern Theoretical Physics’, British Journal for the History of Science, 40: 1 (2007), pp. 25-51 pp. (41-2).
10. Russell McCormmach, Night Thoughts of a Classical Physicist (Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press, 1982), p. 10.
11. Richard Staley, Einstein’s Generation (n. 1).
12. Cf. Heilbron’s analogous basis for evaluating the term ‘Scientific Revolution’ (SR) in chapter 1 of this volume, pp. 7-9
13. Jed Z. Buchwald, The Creation of Scientific Effects. Heinrich Hertz and Electric Waves (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994)
14. Peter Harman, The Natural Philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998).
15. Graeme Gooday ’ ‘Vague and Artificial’: The Historically Elusive Distinction between Pure and Applied Science’ Isis, 103 (2012), pp. 546-554.
16. Sungook Hong, ‘Physics’, in David Cahan (ed.), From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), pp. 163-195 (p. 165).
17. Peter Harman, Metaphysics & Natural Philosophy: The Problem of Substance in Classical Physics (Brighton: Harvester, 1982), p. 4.
18. Thomas Kuhn, Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912 (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
19. David Knight, Public Understanding of Science: A History of Communicating Scientific Ideas (London: Routledge, 2006)
20. Leonard Hill, O.W. Griffith and Martin Flack, ‘The Measurement of the Rate of Heat-Loss at Body Temperature by Convection, Radiation, and Evaporation’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 207 (1916), pp. 183-220 (p. 188).
21. David Cahan, An Institute for an Empire: The Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871-1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)
22. Diana Barkan, Walther Nernst and the Transition to Modern Physical Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)
23. Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach, Intellectual Mastery of Nature: Theoretical Physics from Ohm to Einstein. Vol. 2: The Now Mighty Theoretical Physics (Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, 1986), Chapter 24.
24. Staley, Einstein’s Generation (n. 1), pp. 397-422.
25. Staley, Einstein’s Generation (n. 1), p. 412.
26. Niels Bohr, ‘The Structure of the Atom’ (Nobel Prize address 1922), trans. Frank C. Hoyt, Nature, 112 (1923), pp. 29-44 (p. 31).
27. Jungnickel and McCormmach, Intellectual Mastery of Nature (n. 17), pp. 318-21 (p. 320).
28. Robert M. Eisberg, Fundamentals of Modern Physics (New York: Chichester: Wiley, 1961), p. 1.
29. Kenneth Krane, Modern Physics, 2nd edn. (New York: Wiley, 1996), pp. 2-3.
30. Arthur Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World (Gifford Lectures, Edinburgh University, 1927) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928)
31. Matthew Stanley, Practical Mystic: Religion, Science, and A. S. Eddington (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)
32. Steven French, ‘Scribbling on the blank sheet: Eddington’s structuralist conception of objects’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 (2003), pp. 227-259.
33. Henry E. Armstrong, ‘Good English’, Times (22 August 1930), p. 11F.
34. Staley, Einstein’s Generation (n. 1), pp. 396, 417-418.
35. John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest andMoney (London: Macmillan & Co., 1936)
36. Gregory Radick, ‘Essay Review: The Ethologist’sWorld’, Journal of the History of Biology, 40 (2007), pp. 565-575.
37. M. Abraham & A. Föppl, Theorie der Elektrizität: Einführung in die Maxwellsche Theorie, Vol. 1, Max Abraham, Elektromagnetische Theorie der Strahlung, Vol. 2 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1904-5).
38. F. K. Richtmyer, Introduction to Modern Physics (New York; London: McGraw Hill, 1928)
39. L. F. B., ‘Modern Physics’, Nature, 123 (1929), pp. 198-199.
40. William Thomson, ‘Appendix B. Nineteenth Century Clouds over the Dynamical Theory of Heat and Light’, in his Baltimore Lectures onMolecular Dynamics and TheWave Theory of Light (London: C. J. Clay and Sons, 1904), pp. 486-527 (pp. 486-92).
41. BruceHunt, TheMaxwellians (Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press, 2005).
42. Buchwald, From Maxwell to Microphysics (n. 2), pp. 73-74.
43. Percy W. Bridgman, The Logic of Modern Physics (London: Macmillan, 1928), pp. 1-25.
44. George David Birkhoff and Rudolph Ernest Langer, Relativity and Modern Physics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1923).
45. Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, ‘Two experiments that “proved” relativity’, in The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 27-55.
46. Geoffrey Cantor and Jonathan Hodge, ‘Introduction: major themes in the development of ether theories from the ancients to 1900', in Geoffrey Cantor and Jonathan Hodge (eds), Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories 1740-1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 1-60 (pp. 53-4).
47. Albert Einstein, Sidelights on Relativity (London: Methuen, 1922), pp. 3-24.
48. Ludwik Kostro, Einstein and the Ether (Montreal: Apeiron, 2000).
49. Daniel M. Siegel, ‘Thomson, Maxwell, and the universal ether in Victorian physics’, in Cantor and Hodge (eds.), Conceptions of Ether (n. 42), pp. 239-268 (pp. 239-240).
50. Bruce Hunt, ‘Experimenting on the Ether: Oliver J. Lodge and the Great Whirling Machine’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 16 (1986), pp. 111-134.
51. H. Dingle, ‘Edmund T Whittaker, mathematician and historian’, Science, 124 (1956), pp. 208-209
52. G.F.J. Temple, ‘Edmund Taylor Whittaker’, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society of London, 2 (1956), pp. 299-325
53. Edmund T Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, 1st edn. (London: Longman, Green and Co, 1910)
54. Buchwald, From Maxwell to Microphysics (n. 2).
55. Buchwald, From Maxwell to Microphysics (n. 2), pp. 20, 73-74.
56. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), p. 367.
57. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), p. 368.
58. Hunt, The Maxwellians (n. 39), pp. 209-222
59. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), pp. 295-296, 368.
60. H. Stein, ’ “Subtler forms of matter” in the period following Maxwell’, in Cantor and Hodge (eds.), Conceptions of Ether (n. 42), pp. 309-340 (p. 323).
61. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), p. 369.
62. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), pp. 363-376.
63. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), pp. 376-398.
64. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), pp. 374, 411-413.
65. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), pp. 402-403, 409-428
66. E. Cunningham, ‘The Structure of the Ether’, Nature, 76 (1907), p. 222.
67. Cantor and Hodge, Conceptions of Ether (n. 42), p. 33.
68. Oliver Lodge, ‘The Ether of Space’, The North American Review, 187 (1908), pp. 724-736
69. Robert Cecil (3rd Marquis of Salisbury), ‘On Spectral Lines of Low Temperature’, Philosophical Magazine, 4th series, 45 (1873), 241-245.
70. Herbert McLeod ‘The Marquis of Salisbury, K. G. 1830-1903', Proceedings of the Royal Society, 75 (1905), pp. 319-325.
71. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), p. 295.
72. Cantor and Hodge (eds.), Conceptions of Ether (n. 42)
73. J. Larmor, Aether and Matter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900).
74. Salisbury, ‘Unsolved Problems of Science’ (n. 62), p. 40
75. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), p. 368.
76. Sungook Hong, Wireless: From Marconi’s Blackbox to the Audion (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001), pp. 193-197.
77. Oliver Lodge, Lighting Conductors and Lightning Guards (London: Whittaker and Co., 1892), p. 118.
78. Bruce Hunt, ’ ‘Practice vs. Theory’: The British Electrical Debate, 1888-1891', Isis, 74 (1983), pp. 341-355 (p. 346).
79. William Preece, ‘Address to BAAS Section G (Mechanical Science)', B.A.A.S. Report, Part II (1888), pp. 790-791.
80. Warwick, Masters of Theory (n. 8), pp. 377, 385.
81. Bruce Hunt, Pursuing Power and Light: Technology and Physics from James Watt to Albert Einstein (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010)
82. Robert Fox and Anna Guagnini, Laboratories, Workshops, and Sites. Concepts and Practices of Research in Industrial Europe, 1800-1914 (Berkeley: Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California, 1999), pp. 35-40.
83. Gideon Freudenthal and Peter McLaughlin, The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009).
84. T. H. Huxley, ‘Science’, in Thomas Humphry Ward (ed.), The Reign of Queen Victoria: A Survey of Fifty Years of Progress Vol. 2 (London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1887), pp. 322-87 (pp. 330-1).
85. Christine MacLeod, Heroes of Invention: Technology, Liberalism and British Identity, 1750-1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007), pp. 66-67.
86. Stathis Arapostathis and Graeme Gooday, Patently Contestable (The MIT Press, 2013)
87. Stathis Arapostathis and Graeme Gooday, ‘Electrical technoscience and physics in transition, 1880-1920', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 44 (2012), pp. 202-11.
88. Bruce J. Hunt, ‘Michael Faraday, cable telegraphy and the rise of field theory’, History of Technology, 13 (1991), pp. 1-19.
89. Heinz Otto Sibum, ‘Reworking the Mechanical Value of Heat: instruments of precision and gestures of accuracy in early Victorian England’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 26 (1995), pp. 73-106.
90. Thomas Kuhn, ‘Energy Conservation as an Example of Simultaneous Discovery’, in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1977), pp. 66-104.
91. Graeme Gooday, The Morals of Measurement: Accuracy, Irony and Trust in Late Victorian Electrical Practice (New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)
92. Bruce Hunt, ‘The Ohm is Where the Art is: British Telegraph Engineers and the Development of Electrical Standards’, Osiris, 9 (1994), pp. 48-63
93. Simon Schaffer, ‘Late Victorian Metrology and its instrumentation: a manufactory of ohms’, in R. Bud and S. Cozzens (eds.), Invisible Connections: Instruments, Institutions and Science (Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 1992), pp. 24-55.
94. Huxley, ‘Science’ (n. 75), pp. 330-331.
95. Marie Curie, ‘Rayons Émis per les Composés de l’uranium et du Thorium’ (1898), in Irène Joliot-Curie (ed.), Oeuvres de Marie Sklodowska Curie (Warsaw: Pan’ stwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1954), pp. 43-45.
96. Graeme Gooday, ‘The QuestionableMatter of Electricity: The reception of J.J. Thomson’s ‘corpuscle’ among electrical theorists and technologists’, in Jed Z. Buchwald & Andrew Warwick, Histories of The Electron: The Birth of Microphysics (Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, 2001), pp. 101-134.
97. Reinhard W. Serchinger, Walter Schottky, Atomtheoretiker und Elektrotechniker: Sein Leben und Werk bis ins Jahr 1941. (Diepholz: GNT Verlag, 2008).
98. Crosbie Smith and Norton Wise, Energy and Empire: A biography of Lord Kelvin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
99. Paul Nahin, Oliver Heaviside: The Life, Work, and Times of an Electrical Genius of the Victorian Age, 2nd edn. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002)
100. Arapostathis & Gooday, Patently Contestable (n. 77).
101. James Swinburne, Practical Electrical Measurement (London: Alabaster &Gatehouse, 1888), pp. 25-56
102. Gooday, The Morals of Measurement (n. 81), p. 35.
103. Matthias Dörries, ‘Prior History and After-effects: hysteresis and nachwirkung in 19thcentury physics’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 22 (1991), pp. 25-55.
104. J.A. Ewing, ‘On effects of retentiveness in the magnetization or iron and steel’, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 34 (1882), pp. 39-45
105. Graeme Gooday, ‘Domesticating the Magnet: Secularity, Secrecy and ‘Permanency’ as Epistemic Boundaries in Marie Curie’s Early Work’, Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 3 (2009). _http://spontaneousgenerations.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/article/view/10615_
106. John Hopkinson, ‘Magnetisation of Iron’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Part II (1885), pp. 455-469
107. L.Navarro and J. Olivella, ‘On the nature of the hypotheses in Langevin’s magnetism’, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 47 (1997), pp. 316-45.
108. Peter Galison, Einstein’s Clocks and Poincaré‘s Maps (London: Sceptre, 2003), p. 31.
109. Cahan, An Institute for An Empire (n. 16), pp. 145-157.
110. Martin Klein, ‘Max Planck and the Beginnings of Quantum Theory’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 1 (1962), pp. 459-479
111. Kuhn, Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity (n. 12).
112. Elizabeth Garber, The Language of Physics: The Calculus and Development of Theoretical Physics in Europe 1750-1914 (Boston: Birkhauser, 1999), p. 312.
113. Robert Fox and George Weisz (eds.), ‘The institutional basis of French science in the nineteenth century’, in The Organisation of Science and Technology in France 1808-1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), pp. 1-28 (p. 26)
114. Mary Jo Nye, ‘Scientific Decline: is quantitative evaluation enough?', Isis, 75 (1984), pp. 697-708 (pp. 705-708)
115. Dominique Pestre, ‘Sur la science en France 1860-1940: à propos de deux ouvrages récents deMary Jo Nye et HarryW. Paul’, Révue d’histoire des sciences, 41 (1988), pp. 75-83 (pp. 81-82).
116. Daniel Jon Mitchell, ‘Gabriel Lippmann’s Approach to French Experimental Physics’ (University of Oxford: Unpublished D.Phil thesis, 2010), p. 3
117. Ivan Grattan-Guiness (ed.), ‘France’, in Companion Encyclopeadia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 2 (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 1430-1442.
118. Matthias Dörries, ‘Vicious circles, or the pitfalls of experimental virtuosity’, in Michael Heidelberger and Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Experimental Essays-Versuche zum Experiment (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1998)
119. Charlotte Bigg, ‘Behind the Lines. Spectroscopic enterprises in early twentieth century Europe’ (University of Cambridge: Unpublished PhD thesis, 2001), pp. 17-18.
120. Dominique Pestre, Physique et Physiciens en France 1918-1940 (Paris: Éditions des Archives Contemporaines, 1984), pp. 104-108.
121. Pierre Bertin, ‘Léçon d’ouverture: l’électricité; sa nature’, Revue des Cours Scientifiques de la France et de l’Etranger, 4 (1866), pp. 41-45.
122. Jean-Charles d’Almeida and Augustin Boutan, Cours Elementaire de Physique, 2nd edn. (Paris: Dunod, 1863), p. 2.
123. Josep Simon, Communicating Physics: The Production, Circulation and Appropriation of Ganot’s Textbooks in France and England, 1851-1887 (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2011) pp. 109-33, quotation on p. 132.
124. Mitchell, ‘Gabriel Lippmann’s Approach’ (n. 96), p. 19
125. E. Mercadier, ‘Leçons sur l’électricité et le magnétisme, par MM.Mascart et Joubert’, La Lumière Electrique, 7: 51 (1882), pp. 619-622 (p. 620).
126. Lucien Poincaré, The New Physics and Its Evolution (n. 36).
127. Daniel Berthelot, ‘Gabriel Lippmann: la vie d’un savant’, Revue des Deux Mondes, 10 (1922), pp. 19-46 (p. 24)
128. Edmond Bouty, ‘Gabriel Lippmann’, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 16 (1921), pp. 156-164 (pp. 156, 158).
129. Gabriel Lippmann, ‘Relations entre les phénomènes électriques et capillaries’, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 5 (1875), pp. 494-549 (p. 495).
130. Lippmann, ‘Relations entre les phénomènes électriques et capillaries’ (n. 109), p. 547.
131. Gabriel Lippmann, ‘G. Quincke: Ueber elektrische Ströme bei ungleichzeitigern Eintauchen zweier Quecksilberelektroden in verschiedene Flüssigkeiten’, Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée, 4 (1875), pp. 248-251.
132. Michel Atten and Dominique Pestre, Heinrich Hertz. L’Administration de la Preuve (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2002), p. 81.
133. Atten and Pestre, Heinrich Hertz (n. 112), p. 80.
134. Atten and Pestre, Heinrich Hertz (n. 112), pp. 79-83
135. Édouard Sarasin and Lucien de la Rive, ‘Résonance multiple des ondulations électriques de M. Hertz’, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires de l’Académie des Sciences, 110 (1890), pp. 72-75.
136. Alfred Cornu, ‘Remarques à propos de la communication de MM. Sarasin et de la Rive’, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires de l’Académie des Sciences, 110 (1890), pp. 75-76
137. Atten and Pestre, Heinrich Hertz (n. 112), pp. 43-49, 90-91.
138. Benoit Lelong, ‘Ions, electrometers, and physical constants: Paul Langevin’s work on gas discharges 1896-1903', Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 36 (2005), pp. 93-130 (p. 96).
139. Lelong, ‘Ions, electrometers, and physical constants’ (n. 117), pp. 94-97; Benoit Lelong, ‘Paul Villard, J. J. Thomson, and the Composition of Cathode Rays’, in Jed Z. Buchwald and Andrew Warwick (eds.), Histories of the Electron (n. 85), pp. 135-167, esp. pp. 136-149 (p. 142).
140. Lelong, ‘Ions, electrometers, and physical constants’ (n. 117), pp. 98-100 (p. 99).
141. Lelong, ‘Ions, electrometers, and physical constants’ (n. 117), pp. 110-113
142. Olivier Darrigol, Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein (n. 2), pp. 300-310
143. Mary Jo Nye, Molecular Reality (New York: Elsevier, 1972), pp. 145-146
144. Benoit Lelong, ‘Paul Villard, J. J. Thomson, and the Composition of Cathode Rays’, in Jed Z. Buchwald and AndrewWarwick (eds.), Histories of the Electron (n. 85), pp. 135-167
145. Buchwald and Hong, ‘Physics’ (n. 9), p. 164
146. Poincaré, The New Physics (n. 36), pp. ix-xi.
147. Shaul Katzir, ‘The discovery of the piezoelectric effect’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57 (2003), pp. 61-91
148. Marjorie Malley, ‘The discovery of atomic transmutation: scientific styles and philosophies in France and Britain’, Isis, 70 (1979), pp. 213-223
149. Shaul Katzir, ‘From explanation to description: molecular and phenomenological theories of piezoelectricity’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 34 (2003), pp. 69-94
150. Shaul Katzir, ‘Piezoelectricity and comparative styles’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 (2003), pp. 579-606
151. Jean-Baptiste Dumas, ‘Victor Regnault’, in Discours et Eloges Académiques (Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1885), pp. 174-175
152. Hasok Chang, Inventing Temperature. Measurement and Scientific Progress (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 76.
153. Lelong, ‘Langevin’s work on gas discharges’, pp. 123-124, 127-130
154. Mary Jo Nye, Molecular Reality (New York: Elsevier, 1972), p. 170.
155. Peter Dear, ‘What Is the History of Science the History Of? Early Modern Roots of the Ideology of Modern Science’, Isis, 96 (2005), pp. 390-406.
156. Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996)
157. Staley, Einstein’s Generation (n. 1), pp. 349, 375.