Unsupervised concept-to-text generation with hypergraphs

NAACL HLT 2012 - 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 752-761

  Konstas, Ioannis ^a   Lapata, Mirella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAKINGS; DATABASE RECORDS; DOMAIN INDEPENDENTS; GENERATION PROCESS; HYPER GRAPH; JOINT MODELS; LOCAL DECISIONS; PROBABILISTIC CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS; TEXT GENERATIONS; WEIGHTED HYPERGRAPHS;

CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS;

EID: 84926222565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Gabor Angeli, Percy Liang, and Dan Klein. 2010. A simple domain-independent probabilistic approach to generation. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 502-512, Cambridge, MA.
2. Regina Barzilay and Mirella Lapata. 2005. Collective content selection for concept-to-text generation. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 331-338, Vancouver, British Columbia.
3. Anja Belz. 2008. Automatic generation of weather forecast texts using comprehensive probabilistic generation-space models. Natural Language Engineering, 14(4):431-455.
4. David L. Chen and Raymond J. Mooney. 2008. Learning to sportscast: A test of grounded language acquisition. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 128-135, Helsinki, Finland.
5. David Chiang. 2007. Hierarchical phrase-based translation. Computational Linguistics, 33(2):201-228.
6. Deborah A. Dahl, Madeleine Bates, Michael Brown, William Fisher, Kate Hunicke-Smith, David Pallett, Christine Pao, Alexander Rudnicky, and Elizabeth Shriberg. 1994. Expanding the scope of the atis task: the atis-3 corpus. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology, pages 43-48, Plainsboro, NJ.
7. Pablo A. Duboue and Kathleen R. McKeown. 2002. Content planner construction via evolutionary algorithms and a corpus-based fitness function. In Proceedings of International Natural Language Generation, pages 89-96, Ramapo Mountains, NY.
8. Giorgio Gallo, Giustino Longo, Stefano Pallottino, and Sang Nguyen. 1993. Directed hypergraphs and applications. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 42:177-201.
9. Liang Huang and David Chiang. 2005. Better k-best parsing. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Parsing Technology, pages 53-64, Vancouver, British Columbia.
10. Liang Huang and David Chiang. 2007. Forest rescoring: Faster decoding with integrated language models. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 144-151, Prague, Czech Republic.
11. Liang Huang. 2008. Forest reranking: Discriminative parsing with non-local features. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 586-594, Columbus, Ohio.
12. Frank Keller, Subahshini Gunasekharan, Neil Mayo, and Martin Corley. 2009. Timing accuracy of Web experiments: A case study using the WebExp software package. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1):1-12.
13. Joohyun Kim and Raymond Mooney. 2010. Generative alignment and semantic parsing for learning from ambiguous supervision. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 543-551, Beijing, China.
14. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2001. Parsing and hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pages 123-134, Beijing, China.
15. Zhifei Li and Jason Eisner. 2009. First- and second-order expectation semirings with applications to minimumrisk training on translation forests. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 40-51, Suntec, Singapore.
16. Percy Liang, Michael Jordan, and Dan Klein. 2009. Learning semantic correspondences with less supervision. In roceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 91-99, Suntec, Singapore.
17. Wei Lu and Hwee Tou Ng. 2011. A probabilistic forestto- string model for language generation from typed lambda calculus expressions. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1611-1622, Edinburgh, UK.
18. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
19. Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 2000. Building natural language generation systems. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
20. Ehud Reiter, Somayajulu Sripada, Jim Hunter, and Ian Davy. 2005. Choosing words in computer-generated weather forecasts. Artificial Intelligence, 167:137-169.
21. Yuk Wah Wong and Raymond Mooney. 2007. Generation by inverting a semantic parser that uses statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology and the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 172-179, Rochester, NY.
22. Luke Zettlemoyer and Michael Collins. 2007. Online learning of relaxed CCG grammars for parsing to logical form. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 678-687, Prague, Czech Republic.