|
Volumn 350, Issue , 2015, Pages
|
Update on the UK law on consent Last week's case of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board has important implications for doctors
a
NONE
(United Kingdom)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AUSTRALIAN;
AWARENESS;
CESAREAN SECTION;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTENSIVE CARE;
LAW;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
NEGLIGENCE;
NOTE;
PATIENT CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SHOULDER DYSTOCIA;
UNITED KINGDOM;
VAGINAL DELIVERY;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE;
PHYSICIAN;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
|
EID: 84926217432
PISSN: 09598146
EISSN: 17561833
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1481 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (77)
|
References (4)
|