Regional economic voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990-1999

Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990-1999

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-422

  Tucker, Joshua A ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926201963     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511616136     Document Type: Book

References (455)

1. 1993. “Every Man a Tsar.” New Yorker. 69: 8
2. Achen, Christopher H. 2000. Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. Ann Arbor, MI: manuscript
3. Agh, Attila. 1995. “Partial Consolidation of the East Central European Parties: The Case of the Hungarian Socialist Party.” Party Politics 1 (4): 491– 514
4. Agh, Attila 2000. “Party Formation Process and the 1998 Elections in Hungary: Defeat as Promoter of Change for the HSP.” East European Politics and Societies1 4 (2): 288–315
5. Aguilar, Edwin and Alexander Pacek. 2000. “Macroeconomic Conditions, Voter Turnout, and the Working-class/Economically Disadvantaged Party Vote in Developing Countries.” Comparative Political Studies33 (8): 995–1017
6. Ahdieh, Robert B. 1997. Russia’s Constitutional Revolution: Legal Consciousness and the Transition to Democracy, 1985–1995. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
7. Aidt, Toke. 2000. “Economic Voting and Information.” Electoral Studies19: 349–62
8. Alesina, Alberto and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Alvarez, R. Michael, Jonathan Nagler and JenniferWillette. 2000. “Measuring the Relative Impact of Issues and the Economy in Democratic Elections.” Electoral Studies19: 237–53
10. Anderson, Christopher J. 2000. “Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 151–70
11. Ash, Timothy Garton. 1993. The Magic Lantern. New York: Vintage Books
12. Ash, Timothy Garton. 1999. The Polish Revolution: Solidarity. New York: Viking Penguin
13. Aslund, Anders. 1995. “The Case for Radical Reform,” in Economic Reform and Democracy. Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner, eds. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 74–85
14. Barany, Zoltan D. 1990. “The State of the Parties as Elections Approach.” Report on Eastern Europe, March 16: 11–13
15. Barany, Zoltan D. and Louisa Vinton. 1990. “Breakthrough to Democracy: Elections in Poland and Hungary.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies23 (2): 191–212
16. Barnes, Catherine. 1996. “Federal Elections in Russia: The Necessity of Systemic Reforms.” Demokratizatsiya4 (3): 389–408
17. Bauer, Michael. 2002. “Changing Cleavage Structure and the Communist Successor Parties of the Visegrad Countries,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 341–66
18. Belin, Laura. 1999a. “Fatherland-All Russia Urges Voters to ‘Believe Only in Deeds’.” RFE/RL Russian Election Report 1999–2000 (4): http://www.rferl.org/specials/russianelection/archives/04-261199.asp
19. Belin, Laura. 1999b. “State TV Is Kinder Than Ever To Zhirinovsky.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Election Reports: 1999–2000 Russian Election Cycle (5): http://www.rferl.org/specials/russianelection/archives/05-031299.asp
20. Belin, Laura. 1999c. “State TV Wages Unprecedented ‘Information War’.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Election Reports: 1999–2000 Russian Election Cycle (7): http://www.rferl.org/specials/russianelection/archives/07-171299.asp
21. Belin, Laura. 1999d. “Union Of Right Forces Plays Putin Card.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Election Reports: 1999–2000 Russian Election Cycle (7): http://www.rferl.org/specials/russianelection/archives/07-171299.asp
22. Belin, Laura and Robert W. Orttung. 1997. The Russian Parliamentary Elections of 1995: The Battle for the Duma. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
23. Bell, Janice. 1997. “Unemployment Matters: Voting Patterns during the Economic Transition in Poland, 1990–1995.” Europe-Asia Studies49 (7): 1263–91
24. Bellucci, Paolo. 1984. “The Effect of Aggregate Economic Conditions on the Political Preferences of the Italian Electorate, 1953–1979.” European Journal of Political Research12 (4): 387–401
25. Benoit, Ken, Gyorgy Csalotzky, Ilona Cseve, Zoltan Kovacs, Attila Peteri and Zsolt Szolnoki. 1998. Parliamentary Elections in Hungary 1998: A Guide for International Observers. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Ministry of Interior: National Election Office
26. Benoit, Ken and Jacqueline Hayden. 2004. “Institutional Change and Persistence: The Origins and Evolution of Poland’s Electoral System 1989–2001.” Journal of Politics66 (2): 396–427
27. Benoit, Kenneth and John W. Schiemann. 2001. “Institutional Choices in New Democracies: Bargaining over Hungary’s 1989 Electoral Law.” Journal of Theoretical Politics13 (2): 153–82
28. Berinsky, Adam J. 2004. Silent Voices: Public Oinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
29. Berinsky, Adam and Joshua A. Tucker. 2003. Transitional Survey Analysis: Measuring Bias in Russian Public Opinion. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Berlin, Germany
30. Bernhard, Michael. 1997. “Semipresidentialism, Charisma, and Democratic Institutions in Poland,” in Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics: Comparing Regional and National Contexts. Kurt von Mettenheim, ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 177–203
31. Bigler, Robert M. 1992. “From Communism to Democracy: Hungary’s Transition Thirty Five Years After the Revolution.” East European Quarterly XXV (4): 437– 59
32. Birch, Sarah, Frances Millard, Marina Popescu and Kieran Williams. 2002. Embodying Democracy: Electoral System Design in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
33. Biskupski, Mieczyslaw B. 2000. The History of Poland. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
34. Blahoz, Josef, Lubomir Brokly and Zdenka Mansfeldova. 1999. “Czech Political Parties and Cleavages after 1989,” in Cleavages, Parties, and Voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Kay Lawson, Andrea R¨ommele and Georgi Karasimeonov, eds.Westport, CT: Praeger: 123–40
35. Blount, Simon. 1999. “The Microeconomic Voter.” Electoral Studies18: 505–17
36. Boz´ oki, Andras. 2002. “The Hungarian Socialists: Technocratic Modernization or NewSocial Democracy?,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 89–115
37. Boz´ oki, Andr´as and John T. Ishiyama. 2002. “Introduction and Theoretical Framework,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 1–13
38. Brader, Ted and Joshua A. Tucker. 2001. “The Emergence of Mass Partisanship in Russia, 1993–96.” American Journal of Political Science45 (1): 69–83
39. Brandt, Patrick T., Burt L. Monroe and John T. Williams. 1999. “Time Series Models for Compositional Data.” Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA
40. Brovkin, Vladimir. 1997. “Time to Pay the Bills: Presidential Elections and Political Stabilization in Russia.” Problems of Communism44 (6): 34–42
41. Brown, Archie and Lilia Fedorovna Shevtsova. 2001. Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Putin: Political Leadership in Russia’s Transition. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
42. Brudny, Yitzhak M. 1997. “In Pursuit of the Russian Presidency: Why and How Yeltsin Won the 1996 Presidential Election.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies30 (3): 255–75
43. Bugajski, Janusz. 2002. Political Parties of Eastern Europe: A Guide to Politics in the Post-Communist Era. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
44. Bugge, Peter. 1994. “The Czech Republic,” in Political Parties of Eastern Europe, Russia, and the Successor States. Bogdan Szajkowski, ed. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Information and Reference: 149–73
45. Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and Economic Reform.” Annual Review of Political Science4: 43–65
46. Bunce, Valerie. 2002. “The Return of the Left and Democratic Consolidation in Poland and Hungary,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
47. Bunce, Valerie and Maria Csanadi. 1993. “Uncertainty in Transition: Post Communism in Hungary.” East European Politics and Societies 7 (2): 240– 75
48. Butorova, Martin, Grigorij Meseznikov, Zora Butorova and Sharon Fisher, Eds. 1999. The 1998 Parliamentary Elections and Democratic Rebirth in Slovakia. Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute for Public Affairs
49. Butorova, Zora, Olga Gyarfasova and Marian Velˇsic. 2005. “Verejna Mienka (Public Opinion),” in Slovensko 2004: S´ uhrnn´a spr´ava o stave spolocnosti (Slovakia 2004: Global Report on the State of Society). Miroslav Koll´ar and Grigorij Meseˇznikov, eds. Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute for Public Affairs
50. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York:Wiley
51. Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of theTransition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy13 (1): 5–21
52. Castle, Marjorie and Ray Taras. 2002. Democracy in Poland. Boulder, CO:Westview Press
53. Cepl,Vojtech and Mark Gillis. 1994. “Czech Republic.” East European Constitutional Review3 (1): 64–8
54. Chan, Kenneth. 1995. “Poland at the Crossroads: The 1993 General Election.” Europe-Asia Studies47 (1): 123–45
55. Chan, Kenneth. 1998. “The Polish General Election of 1997.” Electoral Studies17 (4): 561–7
56. Chappell, Henry W. and William R. Keech. 1985. “A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance.” American Political Science Review79 (1): 10–27
57. Chappell, Henry W. and Linda Goncalves Veiga. 2000. “Economics and Elections inWestern Europe: 1960–1997.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 183–97
58. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 1993. “The Geography of the April 25 (1993) Russian Referendum.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 34 (8): 481– 96
59. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 1995a. “The Geography of the Russian 1995 Parliamentary Election: Continuity, Change, and Correlates.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics36 (10): 587–616
60. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 1995b. “The Politics of Russia’s Regions: A Geographical Analysis of the Russian Election and Constitutional Plebiscite of December 1993.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics36 (2): 67–86
61. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 1995c. “A Rayon-Level Analysis of the Russian Election and Constitutional Plebiscite of December 1993.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics36 (8): 459–75
62. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 1996. “Roadmap toVictory: BorisYel’tsin and the Russian Presidential Elections of 1996.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics37 (6): 335–54
63. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 1997. “Urban-Rural Voting Differences in Russian Elections, 1995–1996: A Rayon Level Analysis.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics38 (7): 379–95
64. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 2001. “Regional Patterns of Political Preference in Russia: The December 1999 Duma Elections.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics41 (1): 1–29
65. Clem, Ralph S. and Peter R. Craumer. 2002. “Urban and Rural Effects on Party Preference in Russia:NewEvidence from the Recent Duma Election.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics43 (1): 1–12
66. Colitt, Leslie. 1991. “Jobs Must Go, Says Prague Minister”. Financial Times, Februrary 6, 1991, 4
67. Colton, Timothy J. 1995. “Boris Yeltsin, Russia’s All-Thumbs Democrat,” in Patterns in Post-Soviet Leadership. Timothy J. Colton and Robert C. Tucker, eds. Boulder, CO:Westview Press: 49–74
68. Colton, Timothy J. 1996a. “Economics and Voting in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs12 (4): 289–318
69. Colton, Timothy J. 1996b. “From the Parliamentary to the Presidential Election: Russians Get Real about Politics.” Demokratizatsiya4 (3): 371–9
70. Colton, Timothy J. 1998a. “Ideology and Russian Mass Politics: Uses of the Left- Right Continuum,” in Elections and Voting in Post-Communist Russia. Matthew Wyman, Stephen White and Sarah Oates, eds. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar: 167–89
71. Colton, Timothy J. 1998b. “Introduction: The 1993 Election and the New Russian Politics,” in Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of 1993. Timothy J. Colton and Jerry F. Hough, eds. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press: 1–36
72. Colton, Timothy J. 1999. “Understanding Iurii Luzhkov.” Problems of Post- Communism 46 (5): 14–26
73. Colton, Timothy J. 2000a. “Parties, Citizens, and Democratic Consolidation in Russia.” Paper presented at Ten Years after the Collapse of the Soviet Union: Lessons and Perspectives Conference, Oct. 13–14, Princeton, NJ
74. Colton, Timothy J. 2000b. Transitional Citizens: Voters and What Influences Them in the New Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
75. Colton, Timothy J. 2002. “The Leadership Factor in the Russian Presidential Election of 1996,” in Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Anthony King, ed. New York: Oxford University Press
76. Colton, Timothy J. and Jerry F. Hough, eds 1998. Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of1993. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
77. Colton, Timothy J. and Michael McFaul. 2000. “Reinventing Russia’s Party of Power: “Unity” and the 1999 Duma Election.” Post Soviet Affairs16 (3): 201–24
78. Colton, Timothy J. and Michael McFaul. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: The Russian Elections of 1999 and 2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
79. Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in theWorld’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
80. Curry, Jane. 1995. “Elected Communists in Poland.” Problems of Communism42 (1): 46–50
81. Curry, Jane. 1997. “Which Way is Right?” Transitions4 (5): 74–9
82. Curry, Jane Leftwich and Joan Barth Urban. 2003. The Left Transformed in Postcommunist Societies: the Cases of East-Central Europe, Russia, and Ukraine. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
83. Daniels, Robert V. 1999. “Evgenii Primakov: Contender by Chance.” Problems of Post-Communism46 (5): 27–36
84. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row
85. Duch, Raymond. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science44 (4): 635–52
86. Eagleton, Thomas. 1993. “Road to Capitalism Proves Bumpy.” St. Louis Times- Dispatch, September 26: 3B
87. Editorial. 1993. “Polish Voters Want Less Pain.” Montreal Gazette, September 21: B2
88. Erikson, Robert S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review83 (2): 567–73
89. Erikson, Robert S. 1990. “Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote.” American Journal of Political Science34 (2): 373–99
90. Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen and James A. Stimson. 2000. “Bankers or Peasants Revisited: Economic Expectations and Presidential Approval.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 295–312
91. Evans, Geoffrey and Stephen Whitefield. 1998. “The Structure of Cleavages in Post-Communist Societies: The Case of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Political Studies46 (1): 115–39
92. Feld, Lars and Gebhard Kirchgassner. 2000. “Official and Hidden Unemployment and the Popularity of the Government: An Econometric Analysis for the Kohl Government.” Electoral Studies19: 333–47
93. Fidrmuc, Jan. 2000a. “Economics of Voting in Post-Communist Countries.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 199–217
94. Fidrmuc, Jan. 2000b. Liberalization, Democracy, and Economic Performance During Transition. Bonn, Germany, Center for European Integration Studies (ZEI) Working Paper
95. Fidrmuc, Jan. 2000c. “Political Support for Reforms: Economics of Voting in Transition Countries.” European Economic Review44: 1491–1513
96. Filipov, Mikhail and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1997. “Who Stole What in Russia’s December 1993 Elections.” Demokratizatsiya5 (1): 36–52
97. Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
98. Fish, M. Steven. 1995a. “The Advent of Multipartism in Russia, 1993–95.” Post Soviet Affairs11 (4): 340–83
99. Fish, M. Steven. 1995b. Democracy From Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
100. Fish, M. Steven. 1997. “The Predicament of Russian Liberalism: Evidence from the December 1995 Parliamentary Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies49 (2): 191–220
101. Fish, M. Steven. 1999. “The End of Meciarism.” East European Constitutional Review8 (1/2): 47–55
102. Fish, M. Steven. 2000. “The Executive Deception: Superpresidentialism and the Degredation of Russian Politics,” in Building the Russian State: Institutional Crisis and the Quest for Democratic Governance. Valerie Sperling, ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press: 177–92
103. Fisher, Sharon. 1994. “New Slovak Government Formed after Meciar’s Fall.” RFE/RL Research Report3 (13): 7–13
104. Fisher, Sharon. 1996. “Backtracking on the Road to Democratic Reform,” in Building Democracy: The OMRI Annual Survey of Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
105. Fisher, Sharon. 2002. “The Troubled Evolution of Slovakia’s Ex-Communists,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 116–40
106. Fisher, Sharon and Stefan Hrib. 1994. “Political Crisis in Slovakia.” RFE/RL Research Report3 (10): 20–6
107. Fitzmaurice, John. 1996. “The 1996 Czech Elections.” Electoral Studies 15 (4): 575– 80
108. Fitzmaurice, John. 1999. “The Slovak Elections of 25th and 26th September 1998.” Electoral Studies, 18: 271–300
109. Fitzmaurice, John. 2001. “The Slovak Presidential Election, May 1999.” Electoral Studies20: 305–39
110. Flikke, Geir. 1999. “Patriotic Left-Centrism: The Zigzags of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.” Europe-Asia Studies51 (2): 275–98
111. Fowler, B. 1998. “Notes on Recent Elections Hungarian Parliamentary Elections, May 1998.” Electoral Studies17 (2): 257–62
112. Fricz, Tamas. 2000. “Democratisation, the Party System, and the Electorate in Hungary,” in From Totalitarian to Democratic Hungary: Evolution and Transformation 1990–2000. M´aria Schmidt and L´aszl ´o G. T´ oth, eds. New York: Columbia University Press: 106–46
113. Frye, Timothy. 2000. Brokers and Bureaucrats: Building Market Institutions in Russia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
114. Fule, Erika. 1997. “Changes on the Czech Political Scene.” Electoral Studies16 (3): 341–7
115. Gabel, Matthew J. 1995. “The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in the 1990 Hungarian Elections.” Comparative Politics27 (2): 205–14
116. Gaidar, Yegor T. 1999. Days of Defeat and Victory. Seattle: University ofWashington Press
117. Gall, Carlotta and Thomas De Waal. 1998. Chechnya: Calamity in the Caucuses. New York: New York University Press
118. Gans-Morse, Jordan. 2004. “Searching forTransitologists: Contemporary Theories of Post-Communist Transition and the Myth of a Dominant Paradigm.” Post- Soviet Affairs20 (4): 320–49
119. Gebethner, Stanislaw. 1995.Wybory Parlamentarne 1991 i 1993 A Polska Scena Politycyna. Warsaw, Poland:Wydawnictwo Sejmowe
120. Gershanok, Gennady. 1996. “Cats and Mice: The Presidential Campaign in the Russian Heartland.” Demokratizatsiya4 (3): 349–57
121. Gibson, John and Anna Cielecka. 1995. “Economic Influences on the Political Support for Market Reform in Post-Communist Transitions: Some Evidence from the 1993 Polish Parliamentary Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 47 (5): 765– 85
122. Goidel, Robert and Ronald Langley. 1994. “Media Coverage of the Economy and Aggregate Economic Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly48 (2): 291–312
123. Golder, Matt. 2003. “Explaining Variation in the Success of Extreme Right Parties inWestern Europe.” Comparative Political Studies36 (4): 432–66
124. Goldman, Minton F. 1997. Revolution and Change in Central and Eastern Europe: Political, Economic, and Social Challenges. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
125. Gomez, Brad, and J. Matthew Wilson. 2001. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science45 (4): 899–914
126. Greene,William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
127. Grigoriev, Sergei and Matthew Lantz. 1996. “Lessons of the 1995 State Duma Elections.” Demokratizatsiya4 (2): 159–72
128. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 1998. “Reform Efforts in the Czech and Slovak Communist Parties and Their Successors, 1988–1993.” East European Politics and Societies12 (3): 442–71
129. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: the Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
130. Gustafson, Thane. 1999. Capitalism Russian-Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
131. Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. 1989. “Economic Adjustment in New Democracies,” in Fragile Coalitions: The Politics of Economic Adjustment. Joan M. Nelson, ed.Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council: 57–78
132. Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. 1992. “Economic Adjustment and the Prospects for Democracy,” in The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Stephan Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman, eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 319–50
133. Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995a. “The Challenges of Consolidation,” in Economic Reform and Democracy. Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner, eds. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 1–12
134. Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995b. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
135. Haggard, Stephan and Steven Webb. 1993. “WhatDo We Know About the Political Economy of Economic Policy Reform?” The World Bank Research Observer8 (2): 143–68
136. Hahn, Gordon M. 1996. “Russia’s Polarized Political Spectrum.” Problems of Post- Communism XLIII (3): 11–22
137. Hale, Henry E., ed. 2000. Russia’s Electoral War of 1999–2000: The Russian Election Watch Compendium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
138. Hancock, M. Donald and John Logue. 2000. Transitions to Capitalism and Democracy in Russia and Central Europe: Achievements, Problems, Prospects. Westport, CT: Praeger
139. Hanley, Sean. 2002. “The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia after 1989: “Subcultural Party” to Neocommunist Force?,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 141–65
140. Hanson, Stephen E. and Jeffrey Kopstein. 1997. “The Weimar/Russia Comparison.” Post-Soviet Affairs13 (3): 252–83
141. Hanson, Stephen E. and Jeffrey Kopstein. 1998. “Paths to Uncivil Societies and Anti-Liberal States: A Reply to Shenfield.” Post-Soviet Affairs14 (4): 369–75
142. Haraszti, Miklos. 1998. “Young Bloods: Hungary’s Election Results Promise a New Taste of Political Salami.” Transitions (14): 48–53
143. Harper, Marcus. 2000. “Economic Voting in Postcommunist Eastern Europe.” Comparative Political Studies33 (9): 1191–1227
144. Hellman, Joel, Joshua A. Tucker and Timothy Frye. 1996. An Index of Presidential and Prime Ministerial Powers in the Former Soviet Union and East Central Europe, http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~jtucker/pcelections.html
145. Henderson, Karen. 1994. “The Slovak Republic,” in Political Parties of Eastern Europe, Russia, and the Successor States. Bogdan Szajkowski, ed. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Information and Reference: 525–55
146. Herrera, Yoshiko. 2005. Imagined Economies: The Sources of Russian Regionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
147. Hetherington, Marc. 1996. “The Media’s Role in Forming Voter’s National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science40 (2): 372–95
148. Heyns, Barbara and Ireneusz Bialecki. 1991. “Solidarnosc: Reluctant Vanguard or Makeshift Coalition?” American Political Science Review85 (2): 351–70
149. Hirshman, Albert. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
150. Holbrook, Thomas and James Garand. 1996. “Homo Economus? Economic Information and Economic Voting.” Political Research Quarterly49 (2): 351–75
151. Holmes, Stephen. 1994. “A Forum on Presidential Power.” East European Constitutional Review3 (1): 36–9
152. Honaker, James, Jonathan Katz and Gary King. 2002. “A Fast, Easy, and Efficient Estimator for Multiparty Data.” Political Analysis10 (1): 84–100
153. Host, Viggo and Martin Paldam. 1990. “An International Element in the Vote?” European Journal of Political Research18: 221–39
154. Hough, Jerry F. 1998. “The Political Geography of European Russia: Republics and Oblasts.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics39 (2): 63–95
155. Hough, Jerry F., Evelyn Davidheiser and Susan Goodrich Lehmann. 1996. The 1996 Russian Presidential Election. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
156. Huber, John D., Georgia Kernell and Eduardo L. Leoni. 2005. “Institutional Contact, Cognitive Resources and Party Attachment Across Democracies.” Political Analysis13 (4): 365–86
157. Huskey, Eugene. 1999. Presidential Power in Russia. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
158. Innes, Abby. 1997. “The Breakup of Czechoslovakia: The Impact of Party Development on the Separation of the State.” East European Politics and Societies11 (3): 393–435
159. Innes, Abby. 2001. Czechoslovakia: The Short Goodbye. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
160. Ishiyama, John. 1997. “The Sickle or the Rose? Previous Regime Types and the Evolution of the Ex-Communist Parties in Post-Communist Politics.” Comparative Political Studies30 (3): 299–330
161. Ishiyama, John T., ed. 1999. Communist Successor Parties in Post-Communist Politics. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers
162. Jackson, John E. 2002. “A Seemingly Unrelated Regression Model for Analyzing Multiparty Elections.” Political Analysis10 (1): 49–65
163. Jackson, John E., Jacek Klich, and Krystyna Poznanska. 2003a. “Democratic Institutions and Economic Reform: The Polish Case.” British Journal of Political Science33 (1):85–108
164. Jackson, John E., Jacek Klich, and Krystyna Pozna ´ nska. 2003b. “Economic Transition and Elections in Poland.” Economics of Transition11 (1):41–66
165. Jackson, John E., Jacek Klich, and Krystyna Pozna ´ nska. 2005. The Political Economy of Poland’s Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
166. Jasiewicz, Krzystof. 1992a. “From Solidarity to Fragmentation.” Journal of Democracy3 (2): 55–69
167. Jasiewicz, Krzystof. 1992b. “Poland.” European Journal of Political Research 22: 489– 504
168. Jasiewicz, Krzystof. 1993. “Polish Politics on the Eve of the 1993 Elections: Toward Fragmentation or Pluralism?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 26 (4): 387– 411
169. Jasiewicz, Krzystof. 1997. “Poland: Walesa’s Legacy to the Presidency,” in Postcommunist Presidents. Ray Taras, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 130–67
170. Javeline, Debra. 2003a. Protest and the Politics of Blame: The Russian Response to Unpaid Wages. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
171. Javeline, Debra. 2003b. “The Role of Blame in Collective Action: Evidence from Russia.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 107–21
172. Johnson, Juliet. 2001. “Path Contingency in Postcommunist Trasnformations.” Comparative Politics33 (3): 253–74
173. Johnson, Ron and Charles Pattie. 2001. “Dimensions of Retrospective Voting.” Party Politics7 (4): 469–90
174. Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post- Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
175. Jusko, Karen Long and W. Phillips Shively. 2005. “Applying a Two-Step Strategy to the Analysis of Cross-National Public Opinion Data.” Political Analysis13 (4): 327–44
176. Kaminski, Bartlomiej. 1991. “Systemic Underpinnings of the Transition in Poland: The Shadow of the Round-Table Agreement.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies34 (2): 173–90
177. Karpinski, Jakub. 1995a. “Kwasniewski UnseatsWalesa as President.” Transitions1 (23): 48–50
178. Karpinski, Jakub. 1995b. “Setting the Stage for the Presidential Election.” Transitions 1 (20): 40–3, 71
179. Karpinski, Jakub. 1996. “Former Communists Solidify Their Power, Retain Predecessors’ Policies,” in Building Democracy. Josephine Schmidt, ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 44–55
180. Karpinski, Jakub. 1997a. “Poland’s Phoenix Rises.” Transitions4 (6): 62–5
181. Karpinski, Jakub. 1997b. “With the Left in Charge, The Polish Right Prepares for 1997,” in Forging Ahead, Falling Behind. Josephine Schmidt, ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 42–8
182. Katz, Jonathan and Gary King. 1999. “A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” American Political Science Review93 (1): 15–32
183. Katzman, Mark. 2002. “Slovakia Country Report.” Economist Intelligence Unit November: 1–34
184. Katzman, Mark. 2004. “Slovakia Country Report.” Economist Intelligence Unit November: 1–32
185. Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
186. Kiewiet, D. Roderik. 1983. Macroeconomics & Micro Politics: The Electoral Effect of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
187. Kiewiet, D. Roderik and Douglas Rivers. 1985. “A Retrospective on Retrospective Voting,” in Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes. Michael S. Lewis-Beck and Heinz Eulau, eds. New York: Agathon Press, Inc.: 207–29
188. Kiewiet, D. Roderik and Michael Udell. 1998. “Twenty-five Years After Kramer: An Assessment of Economic Retrospective Voting Based Upon Improved Estimates of Income and Unemployment.” Economics and Politics10 (3): 219–48
189. Kinder, Donald R. and D. Roderik Kiewiet. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science23 (3): 495–527
190. Kinder, Donald R. and D. Roderik Kiewiet. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science11 (1): 129–61
191. King, Gary. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
192. King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review95 (1): 45–69
193. King, Gary, Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
194. King, Gary, Christopher J. L. Murray, Joshua A. Salomon and Ajay Tandon. 2004. “Enhancing the Validity and Cross-cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research.” American Political Science Review98 (1): 191–207
195. King, Gary, Michael Tomz and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 347–61
196. Kipp, Jacob W. 1999. “Aleksandr Lebed: The Man, His Program, and His Political Prospects.” Problems of Post-Communism46 (5): 55–63
197. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1992. “The Formation of Party Systems in East Central Europe.” Politics and Society20 (1): 7–50
198. Kitschelt, Herbert, Zdenka Manfeldova, Radoslaw Markowski and Gabor Toka.1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
199. Koldys, Gregory. 1992. Politics and Political Development in Post-Communist Poland, mimeo
200. Kolesnikov, Sergei. 1996. “The Dilemma of “Our Home is Russia” A View from the Inside.” Demokratizatsiya4 (3): 358–70
201. Kopeck´y, Petr. 2001. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak republics: Party Competition and Parliamentary Institutionalization. Burlington, VT: Ashgate
202. Kopeck´y, Petr and Cas Mudde. 1999. “The 1998 Parliamentary and Senate Elections in the Czech Republic.” Electoral Studies18: 411–50
203. Kopstein, Jeffrey. 1992. “Communist Social Structure and Post-Communist Elections: Voting for Reunification in East Germany.” Communist and Post- Communist Studies25 (4): 363–80
204. Kopstein, Jeffrey. 2003. “Postcommunist Democracy: Legacies and Outcomes.” Comparative Politics35 (2): 231–50
205. K¨ or ¨ os´enyi, Andr´as. 1993. “Stable or Fragile Democracy? Political Cleavages and Party System in Hungary.” Government and Opposition28 (1): 87–104
206. K¨ or ¨ os´enyi, Andr´as.1999. Government and Politics in Hungary. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press
207. Kostelecky, Tomas. 1995. “Changing Party Allegiances in a Changing System: The 1990 and 1992 Parliamentary Elections in the Czech Republic,” in Party Formation in East-Central Europe: Post-Communist Politics in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria. Gordon Wightman, ed. Aldershot, Hants, UK: Edward Elgar: 79–106
208. Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S.Voting Behavior: 1896– 1964.” American Political Science Review65: 131–43
209. Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review77 (1): 92–111
210. Krause, George. 1997. “Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic Expectation.” American Journal of Political Science41 (4): 1170–1200
211. Krause, Kevin Deegan. 2000. Accountability and Party Competition in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Notre Dame, South Bend, IN (doctoral dissertation)
212. Krejc´ı, Oskar. 1995. History of Elections in Bohemia and Moravia. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs
213. Krupa, Andrzej. 1997. Prawie Biala Ksiega Polskiej Sceny Politycznej. Warszawa: Ars Print
214. Kullberg, Judith and William Zimmerman. 1999. “Liberal Elites, Socialist Masses, and Problems of Russian Democracy.” World Politics51 (3): 323–58
215. Kurski, Jaroslaw. 1993. Lech Walesa: Democrat or Dictator? Boulder, CO: Westview Press
216. Lanoue, David. 1994. “Retrospective and Prospective Voting.” Political Research Quarterly47 (1): 193–205
217. Lavigne, Marie. 1994. A Comparative View on Economic Reform in Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia. New York: United Nations
218. Lavigne, Marie. 1995. The Economics of Transition: From Socialist Economy to Market Economy. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press
219. Lawson, Kay, Andrea R¨ommele and Georgi Karasimeonov. 1999. Cleavages, Parties, and Voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Westport, CO: Praeger
220. Leff, Carol Skalnik. 1996. “Dysfunctional Democratization? Institutional Conflict in Post-Communist Slovakia.” Problems of Post-Communism XLIII (5): 36–50
221. Leff, Carol Skalnik. 1997. The Czech and Slovak Republics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
222. Lentini, Peter. 1992. “Post-CPSU Communist Political Formations.” Journal of Communist Studies8 (4): 280–92
223. Lentini, Peter, ed. 1995. Elections and Political Order in Russia: The Implications of the 1993 Elections to the Federal Assembly. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press
224. Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way. 2002. “ElectionsWithout Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy13 (2): 51–65
225. Lewis, Paul G. 1994. “Political Institutionalization and Party Development in Post- Communist Poland.” Europe-Asia Studies46 (5): 779–99
226. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Paolo Bellucci. 1982. “Economic Influences on Legislative Elections in Multi-Party Systems: France and Italy.” Political Behavior4 (1): 93–107
227. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Richard Nadeau. 2000. “French Electoral Institutions and the Economic Vote.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 171–82
228. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Mary Stegmaier. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science3: 183–219
229. Lijphart, Arend, ed. 1992. Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. New York: Oxford University Press
230. Lin, Tse-min. 1999. “The Historical Significance of Economic Voting 1872–1996.” Social Science History23 (4): 562–91
231. Linz, Juan. 1994. “Introduction: Some Thoughts on Presidentialism in Postcommunist Europe,” in Postcommunist Presidents. Ray Taras, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–14
232. Lipinski, Edmund Wnuk. 1993. “Left Turn in Poland: A Sociological and Political Analysis.” Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Studi ´ow Politicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Working paper
233. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press
234. Lockerbie, Brad. 1991. “The Temporal Pattern of Economic Evaluations and Vote Choice in Senate Elections.” Public Choice69 (3): 279–94
235. Lohmann, Susanne, David W. Brady and Douglas Rivers. 1997. “Party Identification, Retrospective Voting, and Moderating Elections in a Federal System:West Germany, 1961–89.” Comparative Political Studies26 (2): 198–229
236. Lucky, Christian. 1994. “Table of Presidential Powers in Eastern Europe.” East European Constitutional Review3 (1): 81–94
237. Lukowski, Jerzy and Hubert Zawadzki. 2001.AConcise History of Poland. Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press
238. MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson and James A. Stimson. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review86 (3): 507–611
239. Mahr, Alison and John Nagle. 1995. “Resurrection of the Successor Parties and Democratization in East-Central Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies28 (4): 393–409
240. Makarenko, Boris. 1999. “Fatherland-All Russia,” in Primer on Russia’s 1999 Duma Elections. Michael McFaul, Nikolai Petrov, Andrei Ryabov et al., eds. Moscow, Russia: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: 61–75
241. Maksymiuk, Jan. 2001. “Left Alliance Takes Over in Poland.” RFE/RL Newsline 5 (184), September 27
242. Malova, Darina. 1995. “Parliamentary Rules and Legislative Dominance: Slovakia.” East European Constitutional Review4 (2): 71–7
243. Manin, Bernard, Adam Przeworski and Susan Stokes. 1999a. “Elections and Representation,” in Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Adam Przeworski, Susan Stokes and Bernard Manin, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 29–54
244. Manin, Bernard, Adam Przeworski and Susan Stokes. 1999b. “Introduction,” in Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Adam Przeworski, Susan Stokes and Bernard Manin, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–26
245. Maravall, Jose Maria. 1995. “The Myth of the Authoritarian Advantage,” in Economic Reform and Democracy. Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner, eds. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 13–27
246. Markowski, Radoslaw. 1999.Wybory Parlamentarne 1997: System Partyjny, Podstawy Polityczne, Zachowania Wyborcze.Warsaw, Poland: Fundacja im. Friedricha Eberta
247. Markowski, Radoslaw. 2002. “The Polish SLD in the 1990s: From Opposition to Incumbents and Back,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 51–88
248. Markowski, Radoslaw and Joshua A. Tucker. 2005. “Pocketbooks, Politics, and Parties: A Micro and Macro-Level Analysis of the June 2003 Polish EU Referendum.” Electoral Studies24 (3): 409–433
249. Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Moira Nelson, and Erica Edwards. 2006. “Party Competition and European Integration in East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality.” Forthcoming in Comparative Political Studies
250. Markus, Gregory B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science32 (1): 137–54
251. M´arkus, Gy¨ orgy. 1999. “Cleavages and Parties in Hungary after 1989,” in Cleavages, Parties, and Voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Kay Lawson, Andrea R¨ommele and Georgi Karasimeonov, eds. Westport, CT: Praeger: 141–58
252. Marsh, Christopher. 2002. Russia at the Polls: Voters, Elections, and Democratization. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press
253. Martin, Peter. 1990. “The New Governments.” Report on Eastern Europe, July 27: 9–13
254. Mason, David S. and Svetlana Sidorenko-Stephenson. 1997. “Public Opinion and the 1996 Elections in Russia: Nostalgic and Statist, Yet Pro-Market and Pro- Yeltsin.” Slavic Review56 (4): 698–717
255. Mateju, Peter and Klara Vlachova. 1998. “Values and Electoral Decisions in the Czech Republic.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies31 (3): 249–69
256. McAllister, Ian. 1995. “Communists, Democracy and Reform in Post-Communist Russia.” Demokratizatsiya3 (3): 262–9
257. McFaul, Michael. 1996. “Russia’s 1996 Presidential Elections.” Post Soviet Affairs12 (4): 318–50
258. McFaul, Michael. 1997a. Russia between Elections: What the December 1995 Results Really Mean. Stanford, CA: University manuscript
259. McFaul, Michael. 1997b. Russia’s 1996 Presidential Election: The End of Polarized Politics. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press Stanford University
260. McFaul, Michael. 2000. “Russia’s 1999 Parliamentary Elections: Party Consolidation and Fragmentation.” Demokratizatsiya8 (1): 5–23
261. McFaul, Michael. 2001. Russia’s Unfinished Revolution: Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
262. McFaul, Michael and Sergei Markov. 1995. “Parties and Electoral Blocs,” in Previewing Russia’s 1995 Parliamentary Elections. Michael McFaul and Nikolai Petrov, eds. Moscow, Russia: Carnegie Moscow Center: 15–100
263. McFaul, Michael and Nikolai Petrov. 1999. “The 1999 Duma Elections in Comparative Perspective,” in Primer on Russia’s 1999 Duma Elections. Michael McFaul, Nikolai Petrov, Andrei Ryabov et al., eds. Moscow, Russia: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: 3–10
264. McFaul, Michael, Nikolai Petrov, Andrei Ryabov and Elizabeth Reisch, eds 1999. Primer on Russia’s 1999 Duma Elections. Moscow, Russia: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
265. Mebane, Walter R. Jr., and Jasjeet J. Sekhon. 2004. “Robust Estimation and Outlier Detection for Overdispersed Multinomial Models of Count Data.” American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 392–411
266. Meguid, Bonnie. 2005. “Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success”. Forthcoming in the American Political Science Review
267. Meirowitz, Adam and Joshua A.Tucker. 2004. Strategic Voting and Information Transmission in Sequential Elections: Run Boris Run. Princeton, NJ: manuscript
268. Meseˇznikov, Grigorij. 1994. “The Programs of Political Parties in Slovakia: In Practice and Declarations,” in The Slovak Path of Transition – To Democracy? Sona Szomlanyi and Grigorij Meseznikov, eds. Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovak Political Science Association: 83–110
269. Meseˇznikov, Grigorij. 1997. “The Open-Ended Formation of Slovakia’s Political Party System,” in Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation and the Struggle for the Rules of the Game. John Gould and Sona Szomolanyi, eds. Bratislava, Slovakia: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung/Slovak Academy of Sciences
270. Mikhailov, Nikolai, Richard G. Niemi and David L.Weimer. 2002. “Application of Theil Group Logit Methods to District-Level Vote Shares: Tests of Prospective and Retrospective Voting in the 1991, 1993, and 1997 Polish Elections.” Electoral Studies21 (4): 631–48
271. Millard, Frances. 1994a. “Poland,” in Political Parties of Eastern Europe, Russia, and the Successor States. Bogdan Szajkowski, ed. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Information and Reference: 313–42
272. Millard, Frances. 1994b. “The Polish Parliamentary Election of September, 1993.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies27 (3): 295–313
273. Millard, Frances. 1994c. “The Shaping of the Polish Party System, 1989–93.” East European Politics and Societies8 (3): 467–94
274. Miller, Arthur H. 1998. “The Russian 1996 Presidential Election: Referendum on Democracy or a Personality Contest?” Electoral Studies17 (2): 175–96
275. Miller, Arthur H. and Thomas F. Klobucar. 2000. “The Development of Party Identification in Post-Soviet Societies.” American Journal of Political Science44 (4): 667–86
276. Miller,Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New AmericanVoter. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
277. Miller, William and Stephen White. 1998. “Political Values Underlying Partisan Cleavages in Former Communist Countries.” Electoral Studies 17 (2): 197– 216
278. Moraski, Bryon and Gerhard Loewenberg. 1999. “The Effect of Legal Thresholds on the Revival of Former Communist Parties in East-Central Europe.” The Journal of Politics61 (1): 151–70
279. Moser, Robert. 1995. “The Impact of the Electoral System on Post-Communist Party Development: The Case of the 1993 Russian Parliamentary Elections.” Electoral Studies14 (4): 337–98
280. Moser, Robert. 1999. “Independents and Party Formation: Elite Partisanship as an Intervening Variable in Russian Politics.” Comparative Politics37 (2): 147–66
281. Moser, Robert G. 2001. “Executive-Legislative Relations in Russia, 1991–1999,” in Russian Politics: Challenges of Democratization. Zoltan D. Barany and Robert Moser, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 64–102
282. Mueller, John. 1996. “Democracy, Capitalism, and the End of Transition,” in Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. Michael Mandelbaum, ed. New York: Council on Foreign Relations: 102–167
283. Mughan, Anthony and Dean Lacy. 2002. “Economic Performance, Job Insecurity and Electoral Choice.” British Journal of Political Science32: 513–33
284. Murrell, Peter. 1993. “What is Shock Therapy? What Did It Do in Poland and Russia?” Post-Soviet Affairs9 (2): 111–40
285. Myagkov, Mikhail. 2001. The 1999 Duma Elections in Russia:AStep Toward Democracy of the Elites’ Game? University of Oregon: manuscript
286. Myagkov, Mikhail and Peter Ordeshook. 2001. “The Trail ofVoters in Russia’s 1999 Duma and 2000 Presidential Elections.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies34 (3): 353–70
287. Myagkov, Mikhail, Peter Ordeshook and Alexander Sobyanin. 1997. “The Russian Electorate, 1991–1996.” Post Soviet Affairs13 (2): 134–66
288. Nadeau, Richard, Richard G Niemi and Antoine Yoshinaka. 2002. “A Cross- National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context across Time and Nations.” Electoral Studies21 (3): 403–23
289. Naim, Moises. 1995. “Latin America: The Second Stage of Freedom,” in Economic Reform and Democracy. Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner, eds. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 28–44
290. Nelson, Joan. 1994. “Overview: How Market Reforms and Democratic Consolidation Affect Each Other,” in Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Joan Nelson, ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers: 1–36
291. Nichols, Thomas M. 2001. The Russian Presidency: Society and Politics in the Second Russian Republic. New York: Palgrave
292. Nickelsburg, Michael and Helmut Norpoth. 2000. “Commander in Chief or Chief Economist? The President in the Eye of the Public.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 313–32
293. Oates, Sarah. 2000. “The 1999 Russian Duma Elections.” Problems of Post- Communism47 (3): 3–14
294. Obrman, Jan. 1992a. “The Czechoslovak Elections: A Guide to the Parties.” RFE/RL Research Report1 (22): 10–16
295. Obrman, Jan. 1992b. “Czechoslovakia’s New Governments.” RFE/RL Research Report1 (29): 1–8
296. Offe, Claus. 1991. “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe.” Social Research 58 (4): 865– 92
297. Ogburn,William F. and Lolagene C. Coombs. 1940. “The Economic Factor in the Roosevelt Elections.” American Political Science Review34 (4): 719–27
298. O’Loughlin, John, Vladimir Kolossov and Olga Vendina. 1997. “The Electoral Geographies of a Polarizing City: Moscow, 1993–1996.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics38 (10): 567–600
299. Olson, David. 1993. “Dissolution of the State: Political Parties and the 1992 Election in Czechoslovakia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies26 (3): 301–14
300. Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action; Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
301. Oltay, Edith. 1994. “Hungarian Socialists Prepare for Comeback.” RFE/RL Research Report9 (4): 21–6
302. Orenstein, Mitchell. 1998. “A Genealogy of Communist Successor Parties in East- Central Europe and the Determinants of Their Success.” East European Politics and Societies12 (3): 472–99
303. Orenstein, Mitchell A. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
304. Orttung, Robert W. 1995. “Divided Democrats Face Uncertain Prospects.” Transitions1 (22): 32–4
305. Osiatynski,Wiktor. 1995. “AfterWalesa: The Causes and Consequences ofWalesa’s Defeat.” East European Constitutional Review4 (4): 35–44
306. Osiatynski, Wiktor. 1996. “The Roundtable Talks in Poland,” in The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism. Jon Elster, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 21–68
307. Otto, Robert C. 1999. “Gennadii Zyuganov: The Reluctant Candidate.” Problems of Post-Communism46 (5): 37–47
308. Pacek, Alexander. 1994. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” American Journal of Political Science38 (3): 723–44
309. Paldam, Martin. 1986. “The Distribution of Election Results and the Two Explanations of the Cost of Ruling.” Europaische Zeitschrift fur Politische Okonomie/European Journal of Political Economy2 (1): 5–24
310. Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades,” in Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Helmut Norpoth, Michael S. Lewis-Beck and Jean-Dominique Lafay, eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 9–31
311. Paldam, Martin and Peter Nannestad. 2000. “What do Voters Know about the Economy? A Study of Danish Data, 1990–93.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 363–91
312. Palmer, Harvey D. and Guy D. Whitten. 1999. “The Electoral Impact of Unexpected Inflation and Economic Growth.” British Journal of Political Science29 (4): 623–39
313. Palmer, Harvey D. and Guy D. Whitten. 2000. “Government Competence, Economic Performance, and Endogenous Election Dates.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 413–26
314. Pehe, Jiri. 1991a. “The Civic Forum Becomes a Political Party.” Report on Eastern Europe, February 1: 1–4
315. Pehe, Jiri. 1991b. “Czech and Slovak Leaders Deadlocked over Country’s Future.” Report on Eastern Europe, November 28: 7–11
316. Pehe, Jiri. 1991c. “The Realignment of Political Forces.” Report on Eastern Europe, May 24: 1–5
317. Pehe, Jiri. 1992a. “Czechoslovakia: Parties Register for Elections.” RFE/RL Research Report1 (18): 20–5
318. Pehe, Jiri. 1992b. “Czechoslovakia’s Changing Political Spectrum.” RFE/RL Research Report January 31: 1–7
319. Pehe, Jiri. 1992c. “Czech-Slovak Conflict Threatens State Unity.” RFE/RL Research Report January 3: 83–87
320. Pehe, Jiri. 1992d. “TheNewSlovak Government and Parliament.” RFE/RL Research Report1 (28): 32–36
321. Pehe, Jiri. 1998. “The Disappointments of Democracy.” Transitions5 (5): 38–42
322. Pereira, Luiz Carlos Bresser, Jose Maria Maravall and Adam Przeworski. 1993. Economic Reforms in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
323. Petrov, Nikolai and Alexey Makarkin. 1999. “Fatherland-All Russia,” in Primer on Russia’s 1999 Duma Elections. Michael McFaul, Nikolai Petrov, Andrei Ryabov et al., eds. Moscow, Russia: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: 121–5
324. Pettai, Vello and Marcus Kreuzer. 1999. “Party Politics in the Baltic States: Social Bases and Institutional Contest.” East European Politics and Societies 13 (1): 148– 89
325. Pittaway, Mark and Nigel Swain. 1994. “Hungary,” in Political Parties of Eastern Europe, Russia, and the Successor States. Bogdan Szajkowski, ed. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Information and Reference: 185–245
326. Plattner, Marc and Larry Diamond. 1995. “Introduction,” in Economic Reform and Democracy. Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner, eds. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: ix–xxii
327. Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2001. “Romania’s Politics of Dejection.” Journal of Democracy12 (3): 156–169
328. Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2004. Radicalization or Protest Vote? Explaining the Electoral Success of Unorthodox Parties in Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: manuscript
329. Posner, Daniel N. and David J. Simon. 2002. “Economic Conditions and Incumbent Support in Africa’s New Democracies: Evidence From Zambia.” Comparative Political Studies35 (3): 313–36
330. Powell, Eleanor N. 2004. Volatility and Party Systems. Princeton, NJ: manuscript
331. Powell, G. Bingham and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 391–414
332. Powers, Denise V. and James H. Cox. 1997. “Echoes from the Past: The Relationship between Satisfaction with Economic Reforms and Voting Behavior in Poland.” American Political Science Review91 (3): 617–33
333. Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
334. Przeworski, Adam. 1992. “The Neoliberal Fallacy.” Journal of Democracy 3 (3): 45– 59
335. Przeworski, Adam. 1993. “Economic Reforms, Public Opinion, and Political Institutions: Poland in the Eastern European Perspective,” in Economic Reforms in New Democracies. Luiz Carlos Bresser Pereira, Jose Maria Maravall and Adam Przeworski, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 132–98
336. Racz, Barnabas. 1991. “Political Pluralism in Hungary: The 1990 Elections.” Soviet Studies43 (1): 107–36
337. Racz, Barnabas. 1993. “The Socialist-Left Opposition in Post-Communist Hungary.” Europe-Asia Studies45 (4): 647–70
338. Rahr, Alexander. 1991. “The Presidential Race in the RSFSR.” Reports on the Soviet Union3 (23): 27–9
339. Rattinger, Hans. 1991. “Unemployment and Elections in West Germany,” in Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Helmut Norpoth, Michael S. Lewis-Beck and Jean-Dominique Lafay, eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 49–62
340. Reddaway, Peter and Dmitri Glinski. 2001. The Tragedy of Russia’s Reforms: Market Bolshevism Against Democracy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press
341. Remington, Thomas F., ed. 1994. Parliaments in Transition: The New Legislative Politics in the Former USSR and Eastern Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
342. Remmer, Karen L. 1991. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review85 (3): 777–800
343. Remmer, Karen L. 1993. “The Political Economy of Elections in Latin America, 1980–1991.” The American Political Science Review87 (2): 393–407
344. Rice, Stuart Arthur. 1928. Quantitative Methods in Politics. New York: A.A. Knopf
345. Roberts, Andrew. 2004. “The State of Socialism: A Note on Terminology.” Slavic Review63 (2): 349–66
346. Roberts, Kenneth and Erik Wibbels. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America:ATest of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations.” The American Political Science Review93 (3): 575–90
347. Roland, Gerard. 1994. “The Role of Political Constraints in Transition Strategies.” Economics of Transition2 (1): 27–41
348. Rosa, Jean-Jacques and Daniel Amson. 1976. “Conditions Economiques et Elections.” Revue Francaise de Science Politique26 (6): 1101–19
349. Rose, Richard. 1998. “Negative and Positive Party Identification in Post- Communist Countries.” Electoral Studies17 (2): 217–34
350. Rose, Richard and Neil Munro. 2002. Elections without Order: Russia’s Challenge to Vladimir Putin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
351. Rose, Richard and Neil Munro. 2003. Elections and Parties in New European Democracies. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press
352. Rose, Richard, Neil Munro and Stephen White. 2001. “Voting in a Floating Party System: the 1999 Duma Election.” Europe-Asia Studies53 (3): 419–43
353. Rose, Richard and Evgeny Tikhomirov. 1996. “Russia’s Forced-Choice Presidential Election.” Post-Soviet Affairs12 (4): 351–79
354. Rose, Richard, Evgeny Tikhomirov and William Mishler. 1997. “Understanding Multi-Party Choice: The 1995 Duma Election.” Europe-Asia Studies 49 (5): 799– 823
355. Ross, Michael. 2003. “Testing Inductively Generated Hypotheses with Independent Data Sets.” Comparative Politics Newsletter (APSA-CP)14 (1): 14–17
356. Royed,Terry, Kevin Leyden and Stephen Borrelli. 2000. “Is ‘Clarity of Responsibility’ Important for Economic Voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten’s Hypothesis.” British Journal of Political Science30 (4): 669–698
357. Rutland, Peter. 1999. “GrigoriiYavlinskii: TheManWhoWould Be King.” Problems of Post-Communism46 (5): 48–54
358. Sabbat-Swidlicka, Anna. 1990. “The Electoral Platform of Presidential Candidates.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Reports on Eastern Europe, Reports on Eastern Europe1 (49): 10–15
359. Sabbat-Swidlicka, Anna. 1993. “Poland: A Year of Three Governments.” RFE/RL Research Report2 (1): 102–7
360. Sabbat-Swidlicka, Anna. 1994. “Poland: The End of the Solidarity Era?” RFE/RL Research Report3 (1): 81–6
361. Sachs, Jeffrey. 1993. Poland’s Jump to the Market Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
362. Sajo, Andras. 1996. “The Roundtable Talks in Hungary,” in The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism. Jon Elster, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 69–98
363. Sakwa, Richard. 1995. “The Russian Elections of December 1993.” Europe-Asia Studies47 (2): 195–227
364. Sakwa, Richard. 1998. “Left or Right? CRPF and Democratic Consolidation,” in Party Politics in Post-Communist Russia. John Lowenhardt, ed. London: Frank Cass: 128–58
365. Sakwa, Richard. 2002a. “The Russian KPRF: The Powerlessness of the Powerful,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 240–67
366. Sakwa, Richard. 2002b. Russian Politics and Society. New York: Routledge
367. Sanders, David. 2000. “The Real Economy and the Perceived Economy in Popularity Functions: How Much Do Voters Need to Know? A Study of British Data, 1974–97.” Electoral Studies19 (2/3): 275–94
368. Sanders, David. 2003. “Party Identification, Economic Perceptions, and Voting in British General Elections, 1974–97.” Electoral Studies22 (2): 239–63
369. Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. London: Macmillan Press
370. Schmidt,M´aria and L´aszl ´o G. T´ oth. 2000. From Totalitarian to Democratic Hungary: Evolution and Transformation 1990–2000. New York: Columbia University Press
371. Schopflin, George. 1991. “Conservatism and Hungary’s Transition.” Problems of Communism40 (1/2): 60–8
372. Shabad, Goldie and Kazimierz Slomczynski. 1999. “Political Identities in the Initial Phase of Systemic Transformation in Poland: A Test of the Tabula Rasa Hypothesis.” Comparative Political Studies32 (6): 690–723
373. Shenfield, Stephen D. 1998. “The Weimar/Russia Comparison: Reflections on Hanson and Kopstein.” Post-Soviet Affairs14 (4): 355–68
374. Shevtsova, Lilia. 1999. Yeltsin’s Russia: Myths and Reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
375. Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1993. “Of Presidents and Parliaments.” East European Constitutional Review2 (1): 30–2
376. Shugart, Matthew Soberg and John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
377. Slider, Darrel, Vladimir Gimpelson and Sergei Chugrov. 1994. “Political Tendencies in Russia’s Regions: Evidence from the 1993 Parliamentary Elections.” Slavic Review53 (3): 711–32
378. Stark, David Charles and L´aszl´o Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
379. Stokes, Susan C. 1996. “Public Opinion and Market Reform: The Limits of Economic Voting.” Comparative Political Studies29 (5): 499–519
380. Swain, Nigel. 1993. “Hungary,” in Developments in East European Politics. Stephen White, Judy Batt and Paul G. Lewis, eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 66–82
381. Swank, Duane, and Hans-Georg Betz. 2003. “Globalization, the Welfare State, and Right-Wing Populism inWestern Europe.”Socio-Economic Review 1 (2): 215– 45
382. Szajkowski, Bogdan, ed. 1994. Political Parties of Eastern Europe, Russia, and the Successor States. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Information and Reference
383. Szczerbiak, Aleks. 1999. “Interests and Values: Polish Parties and their Electorates.” Europe-Asia Studies51 (8): 1401–32
384. Szelenyi, Ivan, Eva Fodor and Eric Hanley. 1997. “Left Turn in Postcommunist Politics: Bringing Class Back In?” East European Politics and Societies 11 (1): 190– 224
385. Szomolanyi, Sona. 1994. “Old Elites in the New Slovak State and their Current Transformations,” in The Slovak Path of Transition – To Democracy? Sona Szomolanyi and Grigorij Meseˇznikov, eds. Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovak Political Science Association: 63–82
386. Szomolanyi, Sona. 1997. “Identifying Slovakia’s Emerging Regime,” in Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation and the Struggle for the Rules of the Game. John Gould and Sona Szomolanyi, eds. Bratislava, Slovakia: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung/Slovak Academy of Sciences
387. Szomolanyi, Sona. 1999. “Slovakia’sTransition Path and the 1998 Elections,” in The 1998 Parliamentary Elections and Democratic Rebirth in Slovakia. Martin Butorova, Grigorij Meseˇznikov, Zora Butorova et al., eds. Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute for Public Affairs: 25–47
388. Szomolanyi, Sona and Grigorij Meseˇznikov, eds 1994. The Slovak Path of Transition – To Democracy?Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovak Political Science Association
389. Taras, Ray. 1995. Consolidating Democracy in Poland. Boulder, CO:Westview Press
390. Taras, Ray, ed. 1997. Postcommunist Presidents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
391. Tavits, Margit. 2005. “The Development of Stable Party Support Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe.” American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 283–298
392. T´oka, G´abor, ed. 1995. The 1990 Election to the Hungarian National Assembly: Analyses, Documents and Data. Berlin: Edition Sigma
393. Tokes, Rudolf L. 1996. Hungary’s Negotiated Revolution: Economic Reform, Social Change and Political Succession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
394. Tomz, Michael, Joshua A. Tucker and Jason Wittenberg. 2002. “An Easy and Accurate Regression Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” Political Analysis10 (1): 66–83
395. Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg and Gary King. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. January 5. Available at:http://gking.harvard.edu/
396. Treisman, Daniel. 1998. “Dollars and Democratization: The Role and Power of Money in Russia’s Transitional Elections.” Comparative Politics31 (1): 1–19
397. Tsipko, Alexander. 1996. “Why Gennady Zyuganov’s Communist Party Finished First.” Demokratizatsiya4 (2): 185–200
398. Tsygankov, Andrei. 1995. “Russia: Strategic Choices Facing Democrats.” Problems of Communism42 (2): 49–53
399. Tucker, Joshua A. 1998. “It’s the Economy, Comrade! Economic Conditions and Election Results in Russia, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL
400. Tucker, Joshua A. 1999. “Reconsidering Economic Voting: Party Type vs. Incumbency in Transition Countries.” Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA
401. Tucker, Joshua A. 2000a. It’s the Economy, Comrade! Economic Conditions and Election Results in Post-Communist Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic from 1990–96. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (doctoral dissertation)
402. Tucker, Joshua A. 2000b. “Taking Account of the Institutional Effect: How Institutions Mediate the Effect of Economic Conditions on Election Results in Five Post-Communist Countries.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,Washington, DC
403. Tucker, Joshua A. 2001. “Economic Conditions and the Vote for Incumbent Parties in Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic from 1990–1996.” Post-Soviet Affairs17 (4): 309–31
404. Tucker, Joshua A. 2002. “The First Decade of Post-Communist Elections and Voting: What HaveWe Studied, and How HaveWe Studied It?” Annual Review of Political Science5: 271–304
405. Tucker, Joshua A. 2004. Red, Brown, and Regional Economic Voting: Evidence from Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic from 1990–99. Princeton, NJ: manuscript
406. Tucker, Joshua A., Alexander Pacek and Adam Berinsky. 2002. “Transitional Winners and Losers: Attitudes Toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries.” American Journal of Political Science46 (3): 557–71
407. Tufte, Edward R. 1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review69 (3): 812–26
408. Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
409. Turnovec, Frantisek. 1997. “Votes, Seats and Power: 1996 Parliamentary Election in the Czech Republic.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies30 (3): 289–305
410. Tworzecki, Hubert. 1996. “The Polish Presidential Election of 1995.” Electoral Studies15 (3): 403–9
411. Tworzecki, Hubert. 2003. Learning to Choose: Electoral Politics in East-Central Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
412. Urban, Joan. 1996. “The Communist Movement in Post-Soviet Russia.” Demokratizatsiya4 (2): 173–84
413. Urban, Joan Barth and Valery D. Solovei. 1997. Russia’s Communists at the Crossroads. Boulder, CO:Westview Press
414. Urban, Michael E. 1992. “Boris El’tsin, Democratic Russia, and the Campaign for the Russian Presidency.” Soviet Studies44 (2): 187–207
415. Vinton, Louisa. 1990a. “Solidarity’s Rival Offspring: Center Alliance and Democratic Action.” Report on Eastern Europe, September 21: 15–25
416. Vinton, Louisa. 1990b. “Walesa and Tyminski into the Second Round.” Report on Eastern Europe, December 21: 14–18
417. Vinton, Louisa. 1993a. “Poland Goes Left.” RFE/RL Research Report2 (40): 21–23
418. Vinton, Louisa. 1993b. “Poland’s Political Spectrum on the Eve of the Elections.” RFE/RL Research Report2 (36): 1–16
419. Wade, Larry, Alexander Groth and Peter Lavelle. 1994. “Estimating Participation and Party Voting in Poland: The 1991 Parliamentary Elections.” East European Politics and Societies8 (1): 94–121
420. Waterbury, John. 1989. “The Political Management of Economic Adjustment and Reform,” in Fragile Coalitions: The Politics of Economic Adjustment. Joan M. Nelson, ed.Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council: 39–56
421. Way, Lucan. 2004. Pluralism by Default and the Sources of Political Competition inWeak States. Philadelphia, PA: manuscript
422. Wenzel, Michal. 1998. “Solidarity and AkcjaWyborcza Solidarnosc: An Attempt at Reviving the Legend.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies31 (2): 139–56
423. Weydenthal, Jan B. de. 1990. “The Start of the Presidential Campaign?” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Reports on Eastern Europe1 (37): 26–8
424. White, Stephen. 1997. “Russia: Presidential Leadership under Yeltsin,” in Postcommunist Presidents. Ray Taras, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 38–66
425. White, Stephen, Richard Rose and Ian McAllister. 1997. How Russia Votes. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers
426. White, Stephen, Matthew Wyman and Sarah Oates. 1997. “Parties and Voters in the 1995 Russian Duma Election.” Europe-Asia Studies49 (5): 767–98
427. Whitefield, Stephen. 2002. “Political Cleavages and Post-Communist Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science5: 181–200
428. Whitefield, Stephen and Geoffrey Evans. 1999. “Class, Markets, and Partisanship in Post-Soviet Russia: 1993–96.” Electoral Studies18 (2): 155–78
429. Whiteley, Paul. 1980. “Politico-Econometric Estimation in Britain: An Alternative Explanation,” in Models of Political Economy. Paul Whiteley, ed. London: Sage Publications: 85–100
430. Whitten, Guy D. and Harvey D. Palmer. 1999. “Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies18: 49–67
431. Wiatr, Jerzy J. 1999. “Political Parties and Cleavage Crystallization in Poland, 1989– 93,” in Cleavages, Parties, and Voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Kay Lawson, Andrea R¨ommele and Georgi Karasimeonov, eds.Westport, CT: Praeger: 159–68
432. Wightman, Gordon. 1993a. “The Czech and Slovak Republics,” in Developments in East European Politics. Stephen White, Judy Batt, and Paul G. Lewis, eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 51–65
433. Wightman, Gordon. 1993b. “The Czechoslovak Parliamentary Elections of 1992.” Electoral Studies12 (1): 83–6
434. Wilkin, Sam, Brandon Haller and Helmut Norpoth. 1997. “From Argentina to Zambia: a World-Wide Test of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 16 (3): 301– 16
435. Williamson, Oliver E. 1987. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Collier Macmillan Publishers
436. Wittenberg, Jason. 2003. “Historical Legacies and Post-Communism.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA
437. Wittenberg, Jason. 2006. Crucibles of Political Loyalties: Church Institutions and Electoral Continuity in Hungary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
438. Wlezien, Christopher, Mark Franklin and Daniel Twiggs. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior19 (1): 7–17
439. Wolchik, Sharon. 1992. “Czechoslovakia,” in The Columbia History of Eastern Europe in the Twentieth Century. Joseph Held, ed. New York: Columbia University Press: 119–63
440. Wolchik, Sharon. 1993. “The Repluralization of Politics in Czechoslvakia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies26 (4): 412–31
441. Wolchik, Sharon. 1994. “The Czech Republic: Havel and the Evolution of the Presidency since 1989,” in Postcommunist Presidents. Ray Taras, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 168–94
442. Woodruff, David. 1999. Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
443. Wyman, Matthew. 1997. “The Russian Elections of 1995 and 1996.” Electoral Studies16 (1): 79–85
444. Wyman, Matthew, Bill Miller, Stephen White and Paul Heywood. 1994. “The Russian Elections of December 1993.” Electoral Studies 13 (3): 254– 71
445. Wyman, Matthew, Stephen White, Bill Miller and Paul Heywood. 1995. “Public Opinion, Parties and Voters in the December 1993 Russian Elections.” Europe- Asia Studies47 (4): 591–614
446. Yeltsin, Boris Nikolayevich. 1990. Against the Grain. New York: Summit Books
447. Yeltsin, Boris Nikolayevich. 1994. The Struggle for Russia. New York: Belka Publications Corp
448. Yeltsin, Boris Nikolayevich. 2000. Midnight Diaries. New York: Public Affairs
449. Ziblatt, Daniel and Nick Biziouras. 2002. “Doomed to be Radicals? Organization, Ideology, and the Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe,” in The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Andr´as Boz´ oki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 287–302
450. Zielinski, Jakub, Kazimierz Slomczynski and Goldie Shabad. 2004. Electoral Control in New Democracies: The Peverse Incentives of Fluid Party Systems. Columbus, OH: manuscript
451. Zlobin, Nikolai. 1994. “Finita la Comedia?” Demokratizatsiya2 (2): 173–6
452. Zubek,Voytek. 1991a. “The Threshold of Poland’sTransition: 1989 Electoral Campaign as the Last Act of a United Solidarity.” Studies in Comparative Communism24 (4): 355–76
453. Zubek, Voytek. 1991b. “Walesa’s Leadership and Poland’s Transition.” Problems of Communism XL (1/2): 69–83
454. Zubek, Voytek. 1993. “The Fragmentation of Poland’s Political Party System.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies26 (1): 47–71
455. Zubek,Voytek. 1995. “The Phoenix Out of the Ashes: The Rise to Power of Poland’s Post-Communist SdRP.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies28 (3): 275–306