Coupling published pedotransfer functions for the estimation of bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity in stony soils

Catena

Volumn 131, Issue , 2015, Pages 99-108

  Nasri, Behzad ^a,b   Fouché, Olivier ^a,b   Torri, Dino ^c  

^a Universite Paris Est   (France)

^b University of Paris Cité   (France)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Guelph permeameter; Prediction performance; Residual humidity; Rock fragment; Soil texture; Wastewater

Indexed keywords

BULK DENSITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; INFILTRATION; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTION; RETENTION; SOIL TEXTURE; VADOSE ZONE;

EID: 84926163532     PISSN: 03418162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adams W.A. The effect of organic matter on the bulk and true densities of some uncultivated podzolic soils. J. Soil Sci. 1973, 24:10-17.
2. Adhikary P.P., Chakraborty D., Kalra N., Sachdev C.B., Patra K., Kumar S., Tomar R.K., Chandna P., Raghav D., Agrawal K., Sehgal M. Pedotransfer functions for predicting the hydraulic properties of Indian soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2008, 46:476-484.
3. Alberto F. Considérations sur la pierrosité des sols bruns a croÛte calcaire du bassin de l'Ebre. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 1971, 6:180-185.
4. Alexander E.B. Bulk density of California soils in relation to other soil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44:689-692.
5. Arshad M.A., Lowery B., Grossman B. Physical tests for monitoring soil quality. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. 1996, 49:123-142. (Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., Madison, WI, USA). J.W. Doran, A.J. Jones (Eds.).
6. Benites V., Pedro M., Machado L.O.A., Elaine Fidalgo C.C., Beáta R.E. Pedotransfer functions for estimating soil bulk density from existing soil survey reports in Brazil. Geoderma 2007, 139:90-97.
7. Bernoux M., Arrouays D., Cerri C., Volkoff B., Jolivet C. Bulk densities of Brazilian Amazon soils related to other soil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1998, 162:743-749.
8. Blake G.R., Hartge K.H. Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 1986, 363-376. (Madison, WI, USA).
9. Brakensiek D.L., Rawls W.J., Stephenson G.R. Modifying SCS hydrologic soil groups and curve numbers for rangeland soils. ASAE Paper No. PNR-84-203 1984, (St. Joseph, Mich).
10. Brigand S., Lesieur V. Assainissement non collectif 2008, Le moniteur, Paris.
11. Bruand A., Pérez Fernandez P., Duval O. Use of class pedotransfer functions based on texture and bulk density of clods to generate water retention curves. Soil Use Manag. 2003, 19:232-242.
12. Bruand A., Duval O., Cousin I. Estimation des propriétés de rétention en eau des sols à partir de la base de données SOLHYDRO: une première proposition combinant le type d'horizon, sa texture et sa densité apparente. Étude et Gestion des Sols 2004, 11:323-334.
13. Campbell C.S. Soil Physics With Basic 1985, Elsevier, New York.
14. Christiaens K., Feyen J. Analysis of uncertainties associated with different methods to determine soil hydraulic properties and their propagation in the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model. J. Hydrol. 2001, 246:63-81.
15. Cosby B.J., Homberger G.M., Clapp R.B., Ginn T.R. A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resour. Res. 1984, 20:682-690.
16. Cousin I., Nicoullaud B., Coutadeur C. Influence of rock fragments on the water retention and water percolation in calcareous soil. Catena 2003, 53:97-114.
17. Curtis R.O., Post B.W. Estimating bulk density from organic matter content in some Vermont forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1964, 28:285-286.
18. Drew L.A. Bulk Density Estimation Based on Organic Matter Content of Some Minnesota Soils. Minnesota Forestry Research Notes 1973.
19. Elrick D.E., Reynolds W.D., Tan K.A. Hydraulic conductivity measurements in the unsaturated zone using improved well analyses. GWMR 1989, 9:184-193.
20. Federer C.A. Nitrogen mineralization and nitrification: depth variation in four New England forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1983, 47:1008-1014.
21. Federer C.A., Turcotte D.E., Smith C.T. The organic fraction-bulk density relationship and the expression of nutrient content in forest soils. Can. J. For. Res. 1993, 23:1026-1032.
22. Ferrer-Julià M., Estrela Monreal T., Sánchez del Corral Jiménez A., García Meléndez E. Constructing a saturated hydraulic conductivity map of Spain using pedotransfer functions and spatial prediction. Geoderma 2004, 23:275-277.
23. Fiès J.C., De Louvigny N., Chanzy A. The role of stones in soil water retention. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2002, 53:95-104.
24. Gee G.W., Or D. Particle-size analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 2002, 4:255-293. (Madison, Wisconsin). J.H. Dane, G.C. Topp (Eds.).
25. Gupta R.K., Rudra R.P., Dickinson W.T., Patni N.K., Wall G.J. Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity measured by various field methods. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 1993, 36:51-55.
26. Hu W., Shao M.A., Si B.C. Seasonal changes in surface bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity of natural landscapes. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2012, 63:820-830.
27. Huntington T.G., Johnson C.E., Johnson A.H., Siccama T.G., Ryan D.F. Carbon, organic matter and bulk density relationship in a forested spodosol. Soil Sci. 1989, 148:380-386.
28. Islam N., Wallender W.W., Mitchell J.P., Wicks S., Howitt R.E. Performance evaluation of methods for the estimation of soil hydraulic parameters and their suitability in a hydrologic model. Geoderma 2006, 134:135-151.
29. ISO/IEC ISO/IEC Guide 98-3/Suppl. 1:2008(E) Uncertainty of Measurement - Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM: 1995) Supplement 1: Propagation of Distributions Using a Monte Carlo Method 2008, (Geneva, Switzerland).
30. Jabro J.D. Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils from particle size distribution and bulk density data. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 1992, 35:557-560.
31. Kaur R., Kumar S., Gurung H.P. A pedotransfer function (PTF) for estimating soil bulk density from basic soil data and its comparison with existing PTFs. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2002, 40:847-858.
32. Klute A., Dirksen C. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils. Methods of Soil Analysis 1986, 694-700. ASA & SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. A. Klute (Ed.).
33. Lee D.M., Reynolds D.W., Elrick D.E., Clothier B.E. A comparison of three methods for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1985, 65. (653-573).
34. Leonaviciute N. Predicting soil bulk and particle densities by soils. Pedotransfer functions from existing soil data in Lithuania. Geografijos Metrastis 2000, 33:317-330.
35. Libardi P.L., Reichardt K., Nielsen D.R., Biggar J.W. Simple field methods for estimating soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44:3-7.
36. Mallants D., Jacques D., Tseng P., van Genuchten M.T., Feyen J. Comparison of three hydraulic property measurement methods. J. Hydrol. 1997, 199:295-318.
37. Manrique L.A., Jones C.A. Bulk density of soils in relation to soil physical and chemical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1991, 55:476-481.
38. Novák V., Kňava K., Šimůnek J. Determining the influence of stones on hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils using numerical method. Geoderma 2011, 161:177-181.
39. Paige G.B., Hillel D. Comparison of three methods for assessing soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. 1993, 155:175-189.
40. Périé C., Ouimet R. Organic carbon, organic matter and bulk density relationships in boreal forest soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2008, 88:315-325.
41. Poesen J., Lavee H. Rock fragments in topsoils: significance and processes. Catena 1994, 23:1-28.
42. Post W.M., Kwon K.C. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2000, 6:317-327.
43. Prévost M. Predicting soil properties from organic matter content following mechanical site preparation of forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68:943-949.
44. Ravina I., Magier J. Hydraulic conductivity and water retention of clay soils containing coarse fragments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1984, 48:736-740.
45. Rawls W.J. Estimating soil bulk density from particle size analysis and organic matter content. Soil Sci. 1983, 135:123-125.
46. Rawls W.J., Pachepsky Y.A., Ritchie J.C., Sobecki T.M., Bloodworth H. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 2003, 116:61-76.
47. Saxton K.E., Rawls W.J. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2006, 70:1569-1578.
48. Saxton K.E., Rawls W.J., Romberger J.S., Papendick R.I. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50:1031-1036.
49. Schaap M.G., Leij F.J. Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Tillage Res. 1998, 47:37-42.
50. Schaap M.G., Leij F.J., van Genuchten M.Th. ROSETTA, a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J. Hydrol. 2001, 251:163-176.
51. Sharma P.P., Carter F.S., Halvorson G.A. Water retention in soils containing coal. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1993, 57:361-362.
52. Shi Z., Xu L., Wang Y., Yang X., Jia Z., Guo H., Xiong W., Yu P. Effect of rock fragments on macropores and water effluent in a forest soil in the stony mountains of the Loess Plateau, China. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11:9350-9361.
53. Soil Survey Staff Keys to Soil Taxonomy 2010, U.S.D.A.-N.R.C. Service, Washington, DC.
54. Spomer L.A. Prediction and control of porosity and water retention in sand soil mixtures for drained turf sites. Agron. J. 1980, 72:361-362.
55. Stewart V.I., Adams W.A., Abdulla H.H. Quantitative pedological studies on soils derived from Silurian mudstones: II. The relationship between stone content and the apparent density of the fine earth. J. Soil Sci. 1970, 21:248-255.
56. Tetegan M., Nicoullaud B., Baize D., Bouthier A., Cousin I. The contribution of rock fragments to the available water content of stony soils: proposition of new pedotransfer functions. Geoderma 2011, 165:40-49.
57. Tomasella J., Hodnett M.G. Estimating soil water retention characteristics from limited data in Brazilian Amazonia. Soil Sci. 1998, 163:190-202.
58. Torri D., Poesen J., Monaci F., Busoni E. Rock fragment content and fine soil bulk density. Catena 1994, 23:65-71.
59. Towner G.D. The influence of sand- and silt-size particles on the cracking during drying of small clay dominated aggregates. J. Soil Sci. 1988, 39:347-356.
60. Tremblay S., Ouimet R., Houle D. Prediction of organic carbon content in upland forest soils of Quebec, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 2002, 32:1-12.
61. Trueba C., Millan R., Schmid T., Lago C., Roquero C., Magister M. Base de datos de propiedades edafologicas de los suelos espanoles 2000, XII. Castilla y Léon, Burgos, Soria y Segovia.
62. Urbanek E., Shakesby R.A. Impact of stone content on water movement in water-repellent sand. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2009, 60:412-419.
63. Verbist K., Baetens J., Cornelis W.M., Gabriels D., Torres C., Soto G. Hydraulic conductivity as influenced by stoniness in degraded drylands of Chile. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73(2):471-484.
64. Vereecken H., Maes J., Feyen J. Estimating unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from easily measured soil properties. Soil Sci. 1990, 149:1-12.
65. Wösten J.H.M. Pedotransfer functions to evaluate soil quality. Developments in Soil Sci 1997, 25:221-245. E.G. Gregorich, M.R. Carter (Eds.).
66. Wösten J.H.M., van Genuchten M.T. Using texture and other soil properties to predict the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1988, 52:1762-1770.
67. Wösten J.H.M., Lilly A., Nemes A., Le Bas C. Development and use of database of hydraulic properties of European soils. Geoderma 1999, 90:169-185.
68. Zhang S., Lövdahl L., Grip H., Tong Y. Soil hydraulic properties of two loess soils in China measured by various field-scale and laboratory methods. Catena 2007, 69:264-273.
69. Zhou B.B., Shao M.A., Shao H.B. Effects of rock fragments on water movement and solute transport in a Loess Plateau soil. Compt. Rendus Geosci. 2009, 341:462-472.