Social solidarity and the gift

Social Solidarity and the Gift

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-234

  Komter, Aafke E ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926145667     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614064     Document Type: Book

References (244)

1. Appadurai, A. (ed.). 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. Arber, S., and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds.). 2000. The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies. London: Routledge
3. Arendt, H. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press
4. Arendt, H. 1978. The Life of the Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World
5. Baal, J. van. 1975. Reciprocity and the Position of Women. Anthropological Papers. Assen: Van Gorcum
6. Bailey, F. G. (ed.). 1971. Gifts and Poison: The Politics of Reputation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
7. Barthes, R. 1973. Mythologies. London: Paladin
8. Baudrillard, J. 1988 [1970]. “Consumer society.” In Poster 1988: 45–63
9. Bauman, Z. 1997. Postmodernity and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity Press
10. Bauman, Z., 1998. Globalization: The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press
11. Bauman, Z., 2001. The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press
12. Bayertz, K. (ed.). 1998. Solidarit¨at: Begriff und Problem [Solidarity: Concept and problem]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
13. Beck, U. 1986. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage
14. Becker, H. A. 1992. Generaties en hun kansen [Generations and their opportunities]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff
15. Becker, H. A., andHermkens, P. L. (eds.). 1993. Solidarity ofGenerations:Demographic, Economic and Social Change, and Its Consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis
16. Bender, T. 1978. Community and Social Change in America. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press
17. Bengtson, V. L. 1993. “Is the ‘Contract across generations’ changing?” In Bengtson and Achenbaum 1993: 3–25
18. Bengtson, V. L.,2001. “Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance ofmultigenerational bonds.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 63: 1–16
19. Bengtson, V. L., and Achenbaum, A. (eds.). 1993. The Changing Contract across Generations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
20. Bengtson, V. L., and Mangen, D. J. 1988. “Family intergenerational solidarity revisited.” In Mangen, Bengtson, and Landry 1988: 222–238
21. Bengtson, V. L., and Roberts, R. E. L. 1991. “Intergenerational solidarity in aging families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family53: 856–870
22. Bengtson, V. L., Rosenthal, C. and Burton, L. 1990. “Families and aging. Diversity and heterogeneity.” In Binstock and George 1990: 263–287
23. Bennett, W. 1993. The Book of Virtues: A Treasury of Great Moral Stories. New York: Simon and Schuster
24. Berking, H. 1999. Sociology of Giving. London: Sage
25. Binstock, R., and George, L. (eds.). 1990. Handbook of Aging and Social Sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press
26. Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley
27. Blieszner, R., and Bedford, V. H. (eds.). 1995. Handbook of Aging and the Family. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press
28. Boszoemenyi-Nagy, I., and Spark, G. M. 1973. Invisible Loyalties. New York: Brunner/Mazel
29. Bott, E. 1957. Family and Social Network. New York: Free Press
30. Bourdieu, P. 1984 [1979]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
31. Bourdieu, P. 1990 [1980]. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press
32. Brink, G. van den. 2001. Agressieve jongeren. Over jeugd, agressie en beschaving in Nederland [Aggressive youngsters: On youth, aggression and civility in the Netherlands]. Nijmegen: SUN
33. Brink, G. van den. 2002. Mondiger of moeilijker? Een studie naar de politieke habitus van hendedaagse burgers [More emancipated or more difficult? A study into the political habitus of contemporary citizens]. The Hague: Sdu Publishers
34. Brown, R. 1986. Social Psychology. New York: Free Press
35. Cahoone, L. 2000a. “Civic meetings, cultural meanings.” In Rouner 2000: 40–65. 2000b. “Response to AlanWolfe.” In Rouner 2000: 142–151
36. Caplow, T. 1982a. Middletown Families. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
37. Caplow, T. 1982b. “Christmas gifts and kin networks.” American Sociological Review 47: 383–392
38. Caplow, T. 1984. “Rule enforcement without visible means: Christmas giving in Middletown.”American Journal of Sociology 89: 1306–1323
39. Carrier, J. G. 1995. Gifts and Commodities. Exchange and Western Capitalism since 1700. London: Routledge
40. Carter, S. L. 1998. Civility: Manners,Morals and the Etiquette of Democracy. New York: Basic Books
41. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell
42. Cheal, D. 1983. “Intergenerational family transfers.” Journal of Marriage and the Family45: 805–813
43. Cheal, D. 1986. “The social dimensions of gift behavior.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships3: 423–493
44. Cheal, D. 1987. “Showing them you love them: Gift giving and the dialectic of intimacy.” Sociological Review35: 150–169
45. Cheal, D. 1988. The Gift Economy. London: Routledge
46. Cohen, R., and Rai, S. M. (eds.). 2000. Global Social Movements. London: Athlone Press
47. Coleman, J. 1986. Individual Interests and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
48. Coleman, J.1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
49. Coleman, J., and Fararo, T. (eds.). 1992. Rational Choice: Advocacy and Critique. London: Sage
50. Coser, L. A. 1971. Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
51. Coser, L. A., andRosenberg, B. (eds.). 1965. Sociological Theory. NewYork: Macmillan
52. Corrigan, P. 1997. The Sociology of Consumption. London: Sage
53. Daal, H. J. van. 1994. “Hedendaags vrijwilligerswerk: gedaanten, identiteit en aantrekkingskracht” [Contemporary volunteer work: Forms, identity and attractivity]. In SCP-Report 1994b: 201–217
54. Davis, J. 1996. “An anthropologist’s view of exchange.” Social Anthropology 4 (3): 213–226
55. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press
56. Dekker, P. (ed.). 1999. Vrijwilligerswerk vergeleken [Volunteer work compared]. The Hague: Sdu Publishers
57. Dekker, P. 2000. “Sociale en politieke participatietrends” [Trends in social and political participation]. In Ester, van Houten, and Steijn 2000: 63–78
58. Dekker, P. 2002. De oplossing van de civil society. Over vrijwillige associaties in tijden van vervagende grenzen [The solution of the civil society: On voluntary associationsin times of blurring boundaries]. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau
59. Doreian, P., and Fararo, T. (eds.). 1998. The Problem of Solidarity: Theories andModels. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach
60. Douglas, M. 1990. Foreword toM.Mauss, The Gift: The Formand Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, pp vii–xviii. London: Routledge
61. Douglas, M., and Isherwood, B. 1979. The World of Goods: Toward an Anthropology of Consumption. London: Allen Lane
62. Durkheim, E. 1951 [1897]. Suicide. New York: Free Press
63. Durkheim, E. 1964a [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press
64. Durkheim, E. 1964b [1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press
65. Durkheim, E. 1965 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press
66. Dykstra, P. 1997. “Employment and caring.” NIDI,Working Paper, November
67. Dykstra, P. 1998. “Moet de overheid ouderen koesteren? Onze kijk op ouderenzorg” [Should the government cherish the old? Our view on elderly care]. Demos 14: 29–31
68. Dykstra, P., and de Jong-Gierveld, J. 1997. “Huwelijksgeschiedenis en informele en formele hulp aan ouderen” [Marital history and informal and formal care to the elderly]. Bevolking en Gezin 3: 35–61
69. Elias, N. 1978. The Civilising Process. Oxford: Blackwell
70. Elster, J. 1989. The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
71. Emerson, R. W. 1902 [1844]. “Gifts.” In The Works of R.W. Emerson: Essays, 302–306. London: Grant Richards
72. Engbersen, G., Schuyt, K., Timmer, J., and van Waarden, F. 1993. Cultures of Unemployment: A Comparative Look at Long-Term Unemployment and Urban Poverty. San Francisco:Westview Press
73. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press
74. Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press
75. Ester, P., van Houten, D., and Steijn, B. (eds.). 2000. De waan van de dag [Today’s delusions]. Amsterdam: SISWO
76. Etzioni, A. 1988. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press
77. Finch, J. 1989. Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press
78. Finch, J., andMason, J. 1993. Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge
79. Finley, M. I. 1988. The World of Odysseus. London: Chatto &Windus
80. Firth, R. 1929. Primitive Economics of the New Zealand Maori. London: Routledge
81. Fiske, A. P. 1991. Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. New York: Free Press
82. Freud, A. 1986 [1936]. The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. London:Hogarth Press
83. Frow, J. 1997. Time and Commodity Culture: Essays in Cultural Theory and Postmodernity. Oxford: Clarendon
84. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books
85. Gennep, A. van. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Trans. by Monika Vizedom and Gabri¨elle L. Caffee. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
86. Gilmore, D. D. (ed.). 1987. Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association
87. Girard, R. 1993 [1977]. La violence et le sacr´e [Violence and the sacred]. Paris: Grasset
88. Godbout, J. T. 1992. L’esprit du don [The spirit of the gift]. Paris: E´ ditions la D´ecouverte
89. Godelier, M. 1999. The Enigma of the Gift. Cambridge: Polity Press
90. Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public:Micro Studies of the Public Order. London: Allan Lane
91. Gouldner, A. W. 1973a. “The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.” In Gouldner 1973c: 226–260
92. Gouldner, A. W. 1973b. “The importance of something for nothing.” In Gouldner 1973c: 260–290
93. Gouldner, A. W. (ed.). 1973c. For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. London: Allen Lane
94. Gregory, C. A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press
95. Habermas, J. 1989. Rechtvaardigheid en solidariteit [Justice and solidarity]. In Korthals 1989: 78–109
96. Hareven, T. K. 1995. “Historical perspectives on the family and aging.” In Blieszner and Bedford 1995: 13–31
97. Harris, H. (ed.). 1979. Scientific Models and Man: The Herbert Spencer Lectures 1976. London: Oxford University Press
98. Hart, J. de. 1999. “Lange-termijntrends in lidmaatschappen en vrijwilligerswerk” [Long-term trends in memberships and volunteer work]. In Dekker 1999: 33–68
99. Hechter,M. 1987. The Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley:University of California Press
100. Heider, F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: JohnWiley
101. Herzfeld, M. 1987. “‘As in your own house’: Hospitality, ethnography, and the stereotype of the Mediterranean society.” In Gilmore 1987: 75–90
102. Hochschild, A. 1979. “Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 551–575
103. Hochschild, A. 2000. “Global care chains and emotional surplus value.” In Hutton and Giddens 2000: 130–147
104. Hoeben, C. 2000. De organisatie van LETSystemen in Nederland, Vakgroep Sociologie [The organization of LET systems in the Netherlands]. Groningen:RUG
105. Homans, G. F. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace andWorld
106. Honneth, A. 1992. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
107. House, J. S., Umberson, D., and Landis, K. R. (1988). “Structures and processes of social support.” Annual Review of Sociology 14: 293–318
108. Hubert, H., andMauss, M. 1974. Sacrifice: Its Nature and Functions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
109. Hutton,W., and Giddens, A. (eds.). 2000. On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism. London: Jonathan Cape
110. Hyde, L. 1983 [1979]. The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. New York: Random House
111. Inglehart, R. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press
112. Ignatieff, M. 1993. Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism. London: Chatto &Windus
113. Johnson, C. 2000. “Perspectives on American kinship in the later 1990s.” Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 623–639
114. Jong-Gierveld, J. de, and van Solinge, H. 1995. “Ageing and its consequences for the socio-medical system.” Straatsburg: Council of Europe Press Population Studies 29
115. Kecskemeti, P. (ed.). 1952. Essays in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press
116. Keohane, R. O., and Ostrom, E. (eds.). 1995. Local Commons and Global Interdependence. London: Sage
117. Kertzer, D. I. 1988. Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven: Yale University Press
118. Klein, M. 1987a [1946–1963]. Envy and Gratitude and Other Works, 1946–1963. Vol. 3. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis
119. Klein, M. 1987b [1957]. “Envy and gratitude.” In Klein 1987a: 176–236
120. Klein, M. 1987c [1963]. “On the sense of loneliness.” In Klein 1987a: 300–314
121. Knijn,T., andKomter, A. (eds.). 2003. Solidarity between the Sexes and theGenerations: Transformations in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
122. Kohli, M. 1999. “Private and public transfers between generations: Linking the family and the state.” European Societies1: 81–104
123. Komter, A. E. (ed.). 1996a. The Gift: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
124. Komter, A. E. 1996b. “Reciprocity as a principle of exclusion.” Sociology30: 299–316
125. Komter, A. E. 2000. “Een kwestie van evenwicht” [A matter of balance]. Tijdschrift voor de Sociale Sector 4: 36–39
126. Komter, A. E. 2001. “The disguised rationality of solidarity: Gift giving in informal relations.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology25: 385–402
127. Komter, A. E., Burgers, J., and Engbersen, G. 2000. Het cement van de samenleving; een verkennende studie naar solidariteit en cohesie [The cement of society: An exploratorystudy of solidarity and cohesion]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
128. Komter, A., and Schuyt, C. J. M. 1993a. Geven in Nederland [Gift giving in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Dagblad Trouw
129. Komter, A., and Schuyt, C. J. M. 1993b. “Geschenken en relaties” [Gifts and relationships]. Beleid & Maatschappij 20: 277–285
130. Komter, A. E., and Vollebergh, W. 1997. “Gift giving and the emotional significance of family and friends.” Journal of Marriage and the Family59 (August): 747–757
131. Komter, A. E., and Vollebergh, W. 2002. “Solidarity in Dutch families: Family ties under strain?” Journal of Family Issues 23 (2): 171–189
132. Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process.” In Appadurai 1986: 64–91
133. Korthals, M. (ed.). 1989. De nieuwe onoverzichtelijkheid en andere opstellen [The new disorder and other essays]. Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom
134. Kulis, S. 1992. “Social class and the locus of reciprocity in relationships with adult children.” Journal of Family Issues13: 482–504
135. K¨unemund, H., and Rein, M. 1999. “There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out.” Ageing and Society 19: 93–121
136. Lane, R. F. 2000. The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press
137. Lasch, C. 1977. Haven in a Heartless World. New York: Norton
138. Lasch, C. 1979. The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in anAge of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Warner Books
139. Laslett, P. 1971. The World We Have Lost. New York: Scribner’s
140. Lazarus, R. S., and Lazarus, B. N. 1994. Passion and Emotion: Making Sense of Our Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press
141. Leer, M. van. 1995. “Van honingcoeck tot lingerie. Sinterklaasgeschenken als Spiegel van relaties” [From honey cake to lingerie: St. Nicholas gifts as a mirror of relationships]. Psychologie & Maatschappij 72 (3): 209–219
142. L´evi-Strauss, C. 1961 [1949]. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Trans. J. H. Bell, J. R. von Sturmer, and R. Needham. Rev. ed. Boston: Beacon
143. L´evi-Strauss, C. 1965. “The principle of reciprocity.” In Coser and Rosenberg 1965: 84–94
144. L´evi-Strauss, C. 1966 [1962]. The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
145. Liefbroer, A., and Dykstra, P. 2000. Levenslopen in verandering. Een studie naar ontwikkelingen in de levenslopen van Nederlanders geboren tussen 1900 en 1970 [Changing lives: A study on life course changes of the Dutch 1900–1970 birth cohorts]. The Hague: Sdu Publishers
146. Lindenberg, S. 1998. “The microfoundations of solidarity: A framing approach.” In Doreian and Fararo 1998: 61–112
147. Luescher, K., and Pillemer, K. 1998. “Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 60: 413–425
148. Lukes, S. 1973. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. A Historical and Critical Study. London: Allen Lane
149. Malinowski, B. 1950 [1922]. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
150. Mangen, D. J., Bengtson, V. L., and Landry, P. H. (eds.). 1988. Measurement of Intergenerational Relations. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage
151. Mannheim, K. 1952 [1928]. “The problem of generations.” In Kecskemeti 1952: 110–158
152. Mauss, M. 1990 [1923]. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge
153. Mayhew, L. 1971. Society: Institutions and Activity. New York: Columbia University Press
154. McClellan, A. 2000. “Beyond courtesy.” In Rouner 2000: 78–94
155. McCracken, G. 1990. Culture and Consumption. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
156. Mead,G. H. 1962 [1934].Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago:University of Chicago Press
157. Merton, R. 1968. “The Matthew effect in science.” Science6 (January): 56–63
158. Miller,D. (ed.). 1995a. Acknowledging Consumption: A Review of New Studies. London: Routledge
159. Miller,D. 1995b. “Consumption and commodities.” Annual Review of Anthropology24: 141–61
160. Miller,D. (ed.). 1998. Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter. London: Ucl-Press
161. Misztal, B. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press
162. Misztal, B. 2001. Informality: Social Theory and Contemporary Practice. London: Routledge
163. Mutran, E., and Reitzes, D. C. 1984. “Intergenerational support activities and wellbeing among the elderly: A convergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives.” American Sociological Review49: 117–130
164. Oorschot, W. van, Komter, A., Houtman, D., and Halman, L. 2001. “Wij en Zij in Europa.Desolidariteit vanNederlanders inEuropees perspectief”[Us and them; The solidarity of the Dutch in European perspective]. Utrecht: AWSB-papers
165. Ogletree, T. W. 1985 [1946]. Hospitality to the Stranger: Dimensions of Moral Understanding. Philadelphia: Fortress Press
166. Osteen, M. (ed.). 2002. The Question of the Gift: Essays across Disciplines. London: Routledge
167. Ostrom, E. 1995. “Constituting social capital and collective action.” In Keohane and Ostrom 1995: 125–160
168. Otnes, C., and Beltramini, R. F. (eds.). 1996. Gift Giving:A Research Anthology. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green State University Press
169. Pahl, R. E. 1984. Divisions of Labour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
170. Parsons, T. 1952. The Social System. London: Tavistock
171. Parsons, T. 1977. The Evolution of Societies. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
172. Peristiany, J. G. (ed.). 1968. Contributions to Mediterranean Sociology. The Hague: Mouton
173. Pessers, D. 1999. “Liefde, solidariteit en recht; Een interdisciplinair onderzoek naar hetwederkerigheidsbeginsel” [Love, solidarity, and the law: An interdisciplinary study of the principle of reciprocity]. Ph.D. diss. Amsterdam
174. Pitt-Rivers, J. 1968. “The stranger, the guest and the hostile host. Introduction to the study of the laws of hospitality.” In Peristiany 1968: 13–31
175. Popenoe,D. 1988. Disturbing the Nest: Family Change and Decline in Modern Societies. New York: Aldine De Gruyter
176. Portes, A., and Sensenbrenner, J. 1993. “Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determination of economic action.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1320–1350
177. Poster, M. (ed.). 1988. Selected Writings. Cambridge: Polity Press
178. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster
179. Raub,W. 1997. Samenwerking in duurzame relaties en sociale cohesie [Cooperation in durable relationships and social cohesion]. Amsterdam: Thesis
180. Raub, W., and Weesie, J. 2000. “The management of matches: A research program on solidarity in durable social relations.” Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences 36 (1): 71–89
181. Regt, A. de, 1993. Geld en gezin. Financi¨ele en emotionele relaties tussen gezinsleden [Money and the family: Financial and emotional relationships between familymembers]. Amsterdam: Boom
182. Roberts, R. E. L., Richards, L. N., and Bengtson,V. L. 1991. “Intergenerational solidarity in families: Untangling the ties that bind.” Marriage and Family Review 16: 11–46
183. Rosenthal, C. J. 1985. “Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor.” Journal ofMarriage and the Family47: 965–974
184. Rossi, A., and Rossi, P. 1990. Of Human Bonding: Parent-Child Relations across the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
185. Rouner, L. S. (ed.). 2000. Civility. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
186. Ryff, C. D., and Seltzer, M. M. 1995. “Family relations and individual development in adulthood and aging.” In Blieszner and Bedford 1995: 95–114
187. Ryff, C. D., and Seltzer, M. M. (eds.). 1996. The Parental Experience in Midlife. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
188. Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone Age Economics. London: Tavistock
189. Salomon, L. M. 1992. America’s Nonprofit Sector: A Primer. New York: Foundation Center
190. Schudson, M. 2000. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
191. Schuyt, T. 2001. Geven in Nederland 2001; Giften, legaten, sponsoring en vrijwilligerswerk [Giving in the Netherlands: Gifts, legacies, sponsoring, and volunteerwork]. Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum
192. Schwartz, B. 1967. “The social psychology of the gift.” American Journal of Sociology73: 1–11
193. Schwartz, B. 1993. “Why altruism is impossible… and ubiquitous.” Social Service Review67: 314–343
194. Schwartz, B. 1996 [1967]. “The social psychology of the gift.” In Komter 1996a: 69–80
195. SCP-Report. 1994a. Informele zorg. Een verkenning van huidige en toekomstige ontwikkelingen [Informal care: An exploration of contemporary and futuredevelopments]. Rijswijk: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/VUGA
196. SCP-Report. 1994b. Civil Society en vrijwilligerswerk I [Civil society and volunteer work]. Rijswijk: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/VUGA
197. SCP-Report. 1998. 25 jaar sociale verandering [25 years of social change]. Rijswijk: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/VUGA
198. SCP-Report. 2000. Nederland in Europa [The Netherlands in Europe]. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau
199. SCP-Report. 2002. Zekere banden. Sociale cohesie, leefbaarheid en veiligheid [Secure ties: Social cohesion, livability, and security]. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau
200. Sen, A. 1979. “Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory.” In Harris 1979: 1–25
201. Sennett, R. 1998. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton
202. Shils, E. 1991. “The virtue of civil society.” Government and Opposition 26 (10): 3–20
203. Shurmer, P. 1971. “The gift game.” New Society18: 1242–1244
204. Simmel, G. 1908. Soziologie: Untersuchungen ueber die Formen der Vergesellschaftung [Sociology: Researches into the forms of sociation]. Leipzig: Dunker undHumblot
205. Simmel, G. 1950 [1908]. “Faithfulness and gratitude.” In Wolff 1950: 379–396
206. Simmel, G. 1978 [1907]. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge
207. Smith, A. 2002 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
208. Smith, J., Chatfield, C., and Pagnucco, R. (eds.). 1997. Transnational SocialMovements and Global Politics. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press
209. Sociale en culturele verkenningen. 1999. [Social and cultural explorations]. TheHague: Elsevier
210. Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley: University of California Press
211. Straus, V. 2000. “Making peace.” In Rouner 2000: 229–247
212. Suitor, J. J., Pillemer, K., Keeton, S., and Robison, J. 1995. “Aged parents and aging children: Determinants of relationship quality.” In Blieszner and Bedford 1995: 223–243
213. Swaan, B. de. 1988. In Care of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
214. Titmuss, R. M. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin
215. T¨onnies, F. 1987. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Reisland
216. Trivers, R. L. 1971. “The evolution of reciprocal altruism.” Quarterly Review of Biology46: 35–57
217. Tsvetajeva, M. 2000. Ik loop over de sterren. Schetsen, dagboekfragmenten en brieven over de Russische Revolutie [I walk over the stars: Sketches, diary fragments, andletters about the Russian Revolution]. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij
218. Turner, B., and Rojek, C. 2001. Society and Culture: Principles of Scarcity and Solidarity. London: Sage
219. Turner, V. W. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine
220. Uzzi, B. 1997. “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1): 35–67
221. Veblen, T. 1934 [1899]. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Vanguard Press
222. Waal, F. de. 1996. Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
223. Waal, F. de. 2001. The Ape and the SushiMaster: Cultural Reflections by a Primatologist. London: Allen Lane
224. Waquant, L., andWilson, J. 1989. “The cost of racial and class exclusion in the inner city.” Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science501: 8–26
225. Waldinger, R. 1995. “The ‘other side’ of embeddedness: A case study of the interplay of economy and ethnicity.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 18 (3): 555–580
226. Walker, A. (ed.). 1996. The New Generational Contract: Intergenerational Relations, Old Age and Welfare. Londen: UCL Press
227. Weber, M. 1947 [1922]. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Trans. by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Free Press
228. Weesie, J., Buskens, V., and Raub, W. 1998. “The management of trust relations via institutional and structural embeddedness.” In Doreian and Fararo 1998: 113–139
229. Weiner, A. 1976. Women of Value, Men of Renown: New Perspectives in Trobriand Exchange. Austin: University of Texas Press
230. Weiner, A.1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-while-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press
231. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regereringsbeleid (WRR). 1999. [Generationally aware policy]. (Report to the government, no. 58 Generatiebewust beleid). The Hague: Sdu Publishers
232. Willems, L. 1994. “Burgerzin en vrijwillige zorg” [Civic spirit and voluntary care]. In SCP-Report 1994b: 185–199
233. Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
234. Wilson, G. 1993. “Intergenerational solidarity from the point of view of people in advanced old age.” In Becker and Hermkens 1993: 625–643
235. Wispe, L. G. 1972. “Positive forms of social behavior: An overview.” Journal of Social Issues 28 (3): 1–20
236. Wit, T. de, and Manschot, H. (eds.). 1999. Solidareit [Solidarity]. Amsterdam: Boom
237. Withuis, J. 1990. Opoffering en hero¨ıek. De mentale wereld van een communistische vrouwenorganisatie in naoorlogs Nederland [Sacrifice and heroism: The mentalworld of a communist women’s organization in the postwar Netherlands].Meppel: Boom
238. Wolfe, A. 1989.WhoseKeeper? Social ScienceandMoralObligation. Berkeley:University of California Press
239. Wolfe, A. 2000. “Are we losing our virtue?” In Rouner 2000: 126–142
240. Wolff, K. (ed.). 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press
241. Wrong, D. H. 1994. The Problemof Order: What Unites and Divides Society. New York: Free Press
242. Wuthnow, R. 1991. Acts of Compassion: Caring for Others and Helping Ourselves. Princeton: Princeton University Press
243. Young, M., andWillmott, P. 1973. The Symmetrical Family: A Study of Work and Leisure in the London Region. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
244. Zoll, R. 2000. Was ist Solidarit¨at heute? [What is solidarity today?]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp