The report of the international financial institution advisory commission: Comments on the critics

The IMF and its Critics: Reform of Global Financial Architecture

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 106-123

  Meltzer, Allan H ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926116545     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493362.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. Burnside, C. and D. Dollar (2000). ‘Aid Policies and Growth’, American Economic Review, 90, 847-68
2. Burnside, C. and D. Dollar Economist, The (2000). ‘Emerging Market Indicators’, 4 November, 118
3. Frankel, J. A. and N. Roubini (2001). ‘The Role of Industrial Country Policies in Emerging Market Crises’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, 8634, 1-110
4. Gilbert, C. L., A. Powell and D. Vines (1999). ‘Positioning theWorld Bank’, Economic Journal, 109, F598-F633
5. International Advisory Commission (2000). Report of the International Financial Institution Advisory Commission, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office
6. International Monetary Fund (2002). ‘IMF Conditionality’ IMF Survey, 31(1), 14 January, 14-16
7. Lerrick, A. (2000). ‘Development Grant Financing: More Aid per Dollar’, Hearing before the Joint Economic Committee, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 12 April
8. Reform of the International Monetary Fund (2000). Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Trade and Finance, 106th Congress, 2nd session. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 27 April
9. US Treasury (2000). Response to the Report of the International Financial Institution Advisory Commission, Washington, DC, Department of the Treasury, 9 June
10. World Bank (1992) (Wapenhans Report). ‘Effective Implementation: Key to Development Impact’, World Bank, internal document