The difficulty of tolerance: Essays in political philosophy

The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-273

  Scanlon, T M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926113471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511615153     Document Type: Book

References (125)

1. Ronald Dworkin in "Taking Rights Seriously," New York Review of Books, December 17, 1970, pp. 23-31.
2. Alexander Meiklejohn, Political Freedom, 2nd edn. (New York: Harper & Row, 1965).
3. Thomas Emerson in Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment (New York: Random House, 1966). esp. pp. 60-2.
4. In Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
5. Metaphysical Elements of Justice, sections 46-9.
6. Robert Paul Wolff In Defense of Anarchism [New York: Harper & Row, 1970].
7. "The Justification of Civil Disobedience," in Hugo Bedau, ed., Civil Disobedience: Theory and Practice (New York: Pegasus Books, 1969).
8. In Schenck v. United States.
9. "Paternalism," in Richard Wasserstrom, ed., Morality and the Law (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1971).
10. In "Preference and Urgency" (1975), in this volume, essay 4, pp. 70-83.
11. W. N. Hohfeld, Fundamental Legal Conceptions (New Haven, 1923)
12. Stig Kanger, "New Foundations for Ethical Theory," in Risto Hilpinen, ed., Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings (Dordrecht, 1971), pp. 36-58.
13. Charles Fried, "Two Concepts of Interests: Some Reflections on the Supreme Court's Balancing Test," Harvard Law Review 76 (1963), 755-78.
14. BernardWilliams, "A Critique of Utilitarianism," in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge, 1973).
15. In Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York, 1974), esp. pp. 32-5 and ch. 7.
16. A Critique of Utilitarianism.
17. "Some Merits of One Form of Rule Utilitarianism," in Gorovitz, ed., Mill: Utilitarianism, with Critical Essays [Indianapolis, IN, 1971].
18. "Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism," in H. D. Lewis, ed., Contemporary British Philosophy, Fourth Series (London, 1976).
19. Fried, "Two Concepts of Interests," p. 758.
20. Scanlon, "A Theory of Freedom of Expression" (1972), in this volume, essay 1, pp. 6-25.
21. Contrast Philip Selznick, Law, Society and Industrial Justice (New York: Sage Foundation, 1969), p. 275
22. Laurence Tribe in "Trial by Mathematics," Harvard Law Review 84 (1971), 1329-93.
23. W. A. Seavey, "Dismissal of Students: 'Due Process,' " Harvard Law Review 70 (1957), 1406-10
24. Z. Chafee, "The Internal Affairs of Associations Not for Profit,"Harvard Law Review 43 (1930), 993-1029.
25. Ronald Dworkin in his "The Right to Go to Law School-the DeFunis Case," New York Review of Books 23 (Feb. 5, 1976), pp. 29-33.
26. Thomas Nagel, "Equal Treatment and Compensatory Discrimination," Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1973), 348-63.
27. Ronald Dworkin, "Hard Cases," Harvard Law Review 88 (1975) 1057-109.
28. "CardinalWelfare, Individualist Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons ofUtility," Journal of Political Economy 63 (1955), 309-21
29. "Can theMaximin Principle Serve as a Basis forMorality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory," American Political Science Review 69 (1975), 594-606.
30. On Economic Inequality (New York: Norton, 1973), pp. 18-19, 77-8.
31. Goodness, Philosophical Review 84, no. 4 (October 1975), sec. v.
32. Charles Fried in his "Difficulties in the Economic Analysis of Rights with Application to the Case ofHealth," in Gerald Dworkin, Gordon Bermant, and Peter G. Brown, eds., Markets and Morals (New York: John Wiley, 1977), pp. 175-95.
33. "A Kantian Conception of Equality," Cambridge Review 96, 2225 (February, 1975), 97.
34. "Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality?," p. 597.
35. "Toward a Definition of Economic Justice," The Public Interest 31 (Spring 1973), 56-80
36. Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party of America, 69 Ill. 2d 605, 373 N.E. 2d 21 (1978).
37. E. Durkheim, "Individualism and the Intellectuals," in R. Bellah, ed., Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973), p. 43.
38. E. Durkheim, Division of Labor in Society, trans. G. Simpson (1933).
39. J. Mill, On Liberty, ed. C. Shields (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956), ch. 2.
40. Mill, On Liberty, ch. 2. 8 A.
41. Meiklejohn, Political Freedom (New York: Harper & Row, 1960).
42. Scanlon, "A Theory of Freedom of Expression" (1972)
43. Scanlon, "A Theory of Freedom of Expression," pp. 19-20.
44. Scanlon, "Rights, Goals, and Fairness" (1978)
45. Patrick Devlin, The Enforcement of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965).
46. R. Titmuss, The Gift Relationship (New York: Random House, 1971), chs. 13-15.
47. Singer, "Altruism and Commerce," Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1973), 312.
48. Henry Shue, "Torture," Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (Winter 1978).
49. Charles Beitz, "Political Theory and International Relations" (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, 1977).
50. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).
51. John Rawls, "The Independence of Moral Theory," Proceedings and Adresses of the American Philosophical Association 47 (1974-5), p. 8
52. Norman Daniels, "Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics," Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979), 256-82, pp. 257-8.
53. Peter Singer, "Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium," The Monist 58 (1974), 490-517
54. R. B. Brandt, A Theory of the Good and the Right (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 16-21.
55. W. D. Ross, Foundations of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939), pp. 52-4, 315.
56. Derek Parfit in "On Doing the Best for Our Children," in M. Bayles, ed., Ethics and Population (Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co. Inc., 1976), pp. 100-15.
57. Peter Singer, "Famine, Affluence and Morality," Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1972), 229-43.
58. J. L. Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1977), p. 42.
59. John C. Harsanyi, "CardinalWelfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility," Journal of Political Economy 63 (1955), 309-21, section iv.
60. Harsanyi, "Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and the Theory of Risk-Taking," Journal of Political Economy 61 (1953), 434-5.
61. Rawls, A Theory of Justice
62. G. J. Warnock in The Object of Morality (London: Methuen, 1971)
63. J. L. Mackie in Ethics.
64. Laurence Tribe, American Constitutional Law (Mineola, NY: Foundation Press, 1978), p. 580.
65. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, pp. 581-2.
66. Geoffrey R. Stone, "Content Regulation and the First Amendment,"William andMary Law Review (Winter 1983), 197.
67. T. M. Scanlon, Jr., "A Theory of Freedom of Expression" (1972)
68. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, p. 583.
69. John H. Ely, "Flag Desecration: A Case Study in the Roles of Categorization and Balancing in First Amendment Analysis," Harvard Law Review 88 (1975), 1482.
70. Richard Brandt, A Theory of the Good and the Right (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), ch. 13.
71. Griffin, Well Being, p. 13.
72. John C.Harsanyi, "Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour," in Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, eds., Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1982), pp. 39-62, here p. 56.
73. Griffin, Well Being, p. 11.
74. Scanlon, "The Moral Basis of Interpersonal Comparisons," in Jon Elster and John Roemer, eds., Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
75. Harsanyi, "Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour," p. 55.
76. Scanlon, "Preference and Urgency" (1975)
77. Griffin, Well Being, p. 33.
78. Harman, The Nature of Morality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977), ch. 4.
79. Paul Ziff, Semantic Analysis (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1960), ch. 6
80. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), ch. 7.
81. Brandt, A Theory of the Good and the Right, ch. 13.
82. Harsanyi, "Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory," American Political Science Review 69 (1975), 594-606, here pp. 600-1.
83. Brandt, A Theory of the Good and the Right, pp. 147-8.
84. Scanlon, "Contractualism and Utilitarianism" (1982)
85. Amartya K. Sen, "Well-being, Agency and Freedom," Journal of Philosophy 82 (1984), 161-221, here pp. 197 ff.
86. Amartya K. Sen, "Equality of What?" in Sen, Choice, Welfare and Measurement (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1980), p. 366.
87. Griffin, Well Being, p. 114
88. MariMatsuda, "Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story," Michigan Law Review 87 (1989).
89. Nagel, "Equality," inMortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979)
90. Sen, Inequality Reexamined (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), p. 13.
91. Lindley Lecture, "Equality or Priority?".
92. Frankfurt, "Equality as a Moral Ideal," in The Importance of What We Care About (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 134-5.
93. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 440.
94. A Theory of Justice, pp. 536-7.
95. Nino, "The Duty to Punish Past Abuses of Human Rights Put into Context," Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 2619-40, p. 2620
96. Diane Orentlicher, "Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime," Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 2537-615.
97. Carlos Nino, Radical Evil on Trial (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996).
98. H. L. A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 234-5.
99. Joel Feinberg in "The Expressive Function of Punishment," in his collection of essays, Doing and Deserving (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).
100. Nino, Radical Evil on Trial, ch. 4.
101. Jorge Correa Sutil, in "Dealing with Past Human Rights Violations," Notre Dame Law Review 67 (1993), 1455-94.
102. Carlos Nino, "A Consensual Theory of Punishment," Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (1983), 295-6.
103. Nino, "A Consensual Theory," p. 296.
104. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960)
105. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), pp. 344-50.
106. J. Raz, "Promises and Obligations," in P. M. S. Hacker and J. Raz, eds., Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), p. 210.
107. T. Scanlon, "Promises and Practices," Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990), 199.
108. D. Patterson, "The Value of a Promise," Law and Philosophy 11 (1992), 400.
109. L. L. Fuller and W. R. Perdue Jr., "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages," Yale Law Journal 46 (1936), 52.
110. J. Raz, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), p. 173.
111. Richard Craswell, "Two Economic Theories of Enforcing Promises," in Peter Benson, ed., The Theory of Contract Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 19-44.
112. P. S. Atiyah, Promises, Morals, and Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981), ch. 7, esp. pp. 192-3
113. R. E. Barnett, "A Consent Theory of Contract," Columbia Law Review 86 (1986), 269.
114. Fuller and Perdue, "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages"
115. P. S. Atiyah, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)
116. R. Craswell, "Contract Law, Default Rules, and the Philosophy of Promising," Michigan Law Review 88 (1989), 489.
117. J. Coleman, Risks and Wrongs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 166-73.
118. Fuller and Perdue, "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages," pp. 56-7.
119. Fuller and Perdue, "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages," p. 61.
120. Atiyah, Freedom of Contract, p. 3.
121. C. Fried, Harvard Law Review 95 (1981), 509, p. 521.
122. Craswell, "Two Economic Theories of Enforcing Promises," pp. 24, 37-9.
123. H. L. A. Hart, "Legal Responsibility and Excuses," in Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law by H. L. A. Hart (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968).
124. Hume, A Treatise on Human Nature, book iii, part ii, sec. v., esp. p. 525.
125. Kronman in "Contract Law and Distributive Justice," Yale Law Journal 89 (1980), 472.