Comparability of measured acceleration from accelerometry-based activity monitors

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 201-210

  Rowlands, Alex V ^a   Fraysse, François ^a   Catt, Mike ^b   Stiles, Victoria H ^c   Stanley, Rebecca M ^a   Eston, Roger G ^a,c   Olds, Tim S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actigraph; Frequency domain; Geneactiv; Gt3x+; Time domain

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ALGORITHM; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ACCELERATION; ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84926079471     PISSN: 01959131     EISSN: 15300315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000394     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baquet G, Stratton G, Van Praagh E, Berthoin S. Improving physical activity assessment in prepubertal children with high-frequency accelerometry monitoring: a methodological issue. Prev Med. 2007; 44:143-7.
2. Basset DR Jr, Rowlands AV, Trost SG. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl):S32-8.
3. Bonomi AG, Goris AH, Yin B, Westerterp KR. Detection of type, duration, and intensity of physical activity using an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(9):1770-7.
4. Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR. Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl):S5-12.
5. Chen KY, Janz KF, Zhu W, Brychta RJ. Redefining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl):S13-23.
6. John D, Sasaki J, Staudenmayer J, Mavilia M, Freedson PS. Comparison of raw acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ activity monitors. Sensors (Basel). 2013;13:14754-63.
7. Kavanagh JJ, Menz HB. Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28:1-15.
8. Oshima Y, Kawaguchi K, Tanaka S, et al. Classifying household and locomotive activities using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture. 2010;31:370-4.
9. Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Raphael C, Freedson PS. Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;37(9):1626-34.
10. Rowlands AV, Stiles VH. Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading. J Biomech. 2012; 45:448-54.
11. Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter S, Bassett D, Freedson PS. An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009;107:1300-7.
12. Stiles VH, Griew PJ, Rowlands AV. Use of accelerometry to classify activity beneficial to bone in premenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(12):2353-61.
13. van Hees VT, Gorzelniak L, Dean León EC, et al. Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PLoS One. 2013;23:e61691.
14. Welch WA, Bassett DR, Thompson DL, et al. Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(10):2012-9.
15. Welk GJ, McClain J, Ainsworth BE. Protocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl):S39-49.
16. Zhang S, Murray P, Zilmer R, Eston RG, Catt M, Rowlands AV. Activity classification using the GENEA: optimum sampling frequency and number of axes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2228-34.
17. Zhang S, Rowlands AV, Murray P, Hurst TL. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(4):742-8.