The EU and the external dimension of human rights policy

A People’s Europe: Turning a Concept into Content

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 155-182

  Cremona, Marise ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926077015     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429464638-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Opinion 2/94, Accession by the Communities to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, [1996] ECR 1-1759;
2. Portugal v Council, [1996] ECR 1-6117.
3. Portugal v Council, [1996] ECR note 2 at paras 23-29.
4. Commission Communication ‘The European Union and the External Dimension of Human Rights Policy: From Rome to Maastricht and Beyond’, COM(95)567 final, 22 November 1995, at para 23.
5. Opinion 1/91 on draftEEA Agreement, [1991] ECR 1-6079
6. Opinion 1/92 on draft EEA Agreement, [1992] ECR 1-2821.
7. Opinion 2/94 on draft EEA Agreement [1992] ECR, note 1, at para 14.
8. France v Commission (re EC-US anti-trust agreement), [1994] ECR 1-3641;
9. France v Commission (re EC-US anti-trust agreement), [1994] ECR, note 2
10. Opinion 2/94, France v Commission (re EC-US anti-trust agreement), [1994] ECR note 1, at paras 23-24.
11. Dashwood A., ‘The Limits of European Community Powers’, (1996) 21 ELRev. 113, at 115.
12. Commission v. Council (ERTA), [1971] ECR 263.
13. Opinion 2/94, Commission v. Council (ERTA), [1971] ECR, note 1, at para 26.
14. Opinion 2/94, Commission v. Council (ERTA), [1971] ECR, note 1, at para 34.
15. Opinion 2/94, Commission v. Council (ERTA), [1971] ECR, note 8.
16. Opinion 2/94, Commission v. Council (ERTA), [1971] ECR, note 1, at para 30.
17. Brunner v European Union Treaty, [1994] 1 CMLR 57, at para 99.
18. Opinion 2/94, Brunner v European Union Treaty, [1994] 1 CMLR 57, note 1, at para 34.
19. Opinion 2/94, Brunner v European Union Treaty, [1994] 1 CMLR 57, note 1 at para 35.
20. Coppel J., and O’Neill A., ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?', (1992) 14 Legal Studies 227;
21. Phelan D.R., ‘Right to Life of the Unborn v. Promotion of Trade in Services: The European Court and the Normative Shaping of the European Union’, (1992) 55 MLR 670;
22. De Burca G., ‘Fundamental Human Rights and the Reach of EC Law’, (1993) 13 OJLS 283.
23. Bulletin of the EC 11-1991. p. 122.
24. Opinion 2/94, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991 note 1
25. Opinion 2/94, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991 at para 34.
26. Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret AS v Minister for Transport, Ireland, [1996] ECR 1-3953, at para 26.
27. Council common position on Cuba, on the basis of Article J.2 TEU, 2 December 1996, at para 1.
28. Cremona M., ‘Human Rights and Democracy Clauses in the EC’s Trade Agreements’, in Emiliou N., and O’Keeffe D., (eds.) The European Union and World Trade Law, London, Wiley, 1996, pp. 62-77.
29. European Voice, Vol. 3, No. 11, p. 14.
30. Commission Communication ‘The EU and the External Dimension of Human Rights Policy: From Rome to Maastricht and Beyond’, 22 November 1995, COM(95) 567 final, at para 61.
31. Bulletin of the EC 11-1991, p. 122.
32. Commission Communication, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991, note 38, at para 42 (emphasis added).
33. Commission Communication, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991, note 38, at para 36.
34. Commission Communication, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991, note 38, note 9.
35. Opinion 2/94, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991, note 1, at paras 32-34.
36. Bulletin of the EC 11-1991, note 2, at paras 24 and 26.
37. The Commission Communication, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991, note 38
38. Bulletin of the EC 11-1991 note 2, at para 27.
39. Bulletin of the EC 11-1991 note 2, at para 38.
40. Bulletin of the EC 11-1991 at para 47.
41. Opinion 2/94, Bulletin of the EC 11-1991 note 1
42. Commission v Council, [1987] ECR 1493.
43. R v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Anastasiou, [1994] ECR 1-3087
44. Cremona M., (1996) 33 CMLRev., 125.
45. CMLRev note 58 Article 2.
46. Phelan D.R., CMLRev, note 24.
47. CMLRev, note 41.
48. CMLRev note 2, at para 26.
49. Demirel, [1987] ECR 3719, at para 28.
50. Commission v Germany, [1989] ECR 1263.
51. ONEMv Kziber [1991] ECR 199.
52. Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, [1970] ECR 1125, at paras. 3-4;
53. Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727, at paras. 14-15.
54. Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727 note 33.
55. Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727 note 40.
56. the Commission’s report, Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727, note 35.
57. Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727 note 38.
58. Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727 at para 32.
59. Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727 at paras 34-55.
60. Hauer, [1979] ECR 3727 at paras 96 and 98.