A Case Study of Librarian Outreach to Scientists: Collaborative Research and Scholarly Communication in Conservation Biology

College and Undergraduate Libraries

Volumn 21, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 377-395

  Adams, Tina M ^a   Bullard, Kristen A ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Altmetrics; data sharing; faculty librarian cooperation; open access; scholarly communication; social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926021534     PISSN: 10691316     EISSN: 15452530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2014.925415     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bhatti, Rubina. 2009. “Teacher-Librarian Collaboration in University Libraries: A Selective Review.” Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal 40(2):3–12.
2. Bohannon, John. 2013. “Who's Afraid of Peer Review?” Science 342(6154):60–65. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60
3. Bonney, Rick, Heidi Ballard, Rebecca Jordan, Ellen McCallie, Tina Phillips, Jennifer Shirk, and CandieC. Wilderman. 2009. “Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education.” Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education. CAISE Newsletter 8. http://informalscience.org/documents/legacy_newsletters/CAISE%20Newsletter%20Jun-Jul%202009.pdf
4. Borgman, ChristineL. 2012. “The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(6):1059–78. doi: 10.1002/asi.22634
5. Brandt, ScottD. 2007.”Librarians as Partners in E-research Purdue University Libraries Promote Collaboration.” College & Research Libraries News 68(6):365–96.
6. Carlson, Jake, and Ruth Kneale. 2011. “Embedded Librarianship in the Research Context: Navigating New Waters.” College & Research Libraries News 72(3):167–70.
7. Gallegos, Bee, and Thomas Wright. 2000. “Collaborations in the Field: Examples from a Survey.” In The Collaborative Imperative: Librarians and Faculty Working Together in the Information Universe, edited by Richard Raspa and Dane Ward, 97–113. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
8. Galloway, LindaM., JanetL. Pease, and AnneE. Rauh. 2013. “Introduction to Altmetrics for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Librarians.” Science & Technology Libraries 32(4):335–45. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2013.829762
9. Gratwicke, Brian, interview by Kristin Bullard, May 21, 2013, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
10. Gu, Feng, and Gunilla Widén-Wulff. 2011. “Scholarly Communication and Possible Changes in the Context of Social Media: A Finnish Case Study.” The Electronic Library, 29(6):762–76.
11. Hitchcock, Steve. 2013. “The Effect of Open Access and Downloads (‘hits’) on Citation Impact: A Bibliography of Studies.” The Open Citation Project. http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
12. Kiss, Jemima. 2014. “Facebook's 10th Birthday: From College Dorm to 1.23 Billion Users.” The Guardian, February 3. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-10-years-mark-zuckerberg
13. Laakso, Mikael, and Bo-Christer Björk. 2012. “Anatomy of Open Access Publishing: A Study of Longitudinal Development and Internal Structure.” BMC Medicine 10(1):124.
14. Loss, Scott, interview by Kristin Bullard, May 21, 2013, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
15. MacMillan, Don. 2012. “Mendeley: Teaching Scholarly Communication and Collaboration through Social Networking.” Library Management 33(8/9):561–69.
16. Malenfant, KaraJ. 2010. “Leading Change in the System of Scholarly Communication: A Case Study of Engaging Liaison Librarians for Outreach to Faculty.” College & Research Libraries 71(1):63–76.
17. Massis, BruceE. 2012. “Librarians and Faculty Collaboration—Partners in Student Success.” New Library World Library 113(1/2):90–93.
18. Mavodza, Judith. 2011. “The Academic Librarian and the Academe.” New Library World 112(9/10):446–51.
19. McMahon, TamaraM., JamesE. Powell, Matthew Hopkins, DanielA. Alcazar, LanieceE. Miller, LinnMarks Collins, and KetanK. Mane. 2012. “Social Awareness Tools for Science Research.” D-Lib Magazine 18(3/4). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march12/mcmahon/03mcmahon.html
20. Mounce, Michael. 2010. “Working Together: Academic Librarians and Faculty Collaborating to Improve Students’ Information Literacy Skills: A Literature Review 2000–2009.” Reference Librarian 4(51):300–20.
21. Nature Communications. 2014. “Article Metrics for: The Impact of Free-Ranging Domestic Cats on Wildlife of the United States” Nature Communications 4(1396). http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v4/n1/ncomms2380/metrics/news
22. Nelson, Bryn. 2009. “Data Sharing: Empty Archives.” Nature News 461(7261):160–63. doi: 10.1038/461160a
23. NIH (NIH Office of Extramural Research). 2006. “Data Sharing Regulations/Policy/Guidance Chart for NIH Awards.” http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data%5Fsharing/data_sharing_chart.doc
24. NPG (Nature Publishing Group). 2014. “Scientific Data: About.” http://www.nature.com/sdata/about/
25. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2010. “Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results.” http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp
26. O’Dell, Sue. 2010. “Opportunities and Obligations for Libraries in a Social Networking Age: A Survey of Web 2.0 and Networking Sites.” Journal of Library Administration 50(3):237–51.
27. Plum Analytics. 2014. “Overview: Plum Metrics.” http://www.plumanalytics.com/metrics.html
28. Posner, Miriam. 2011. “Creating Your Web Presence: A Primer for Academics.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 11. http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/creating-your-web-presence-a-primer-for-academics/30458
29. Priem, Jason, HeatherA. Piwowar, and BradleyM. Hemminger. 2012. “Altmetrics in the Wild: Using Social Media to Explore Scholarly Impact.” arXiv:1203. 4745 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745
30. Rader, HanneloreB. 2002. “Information Literacy 1973–2002: A Selected Literature Review.” Library Trends 51(2):242–59.
31. Reynolds, LatishaM., SiobhanE. Smith, and MargaretU. D’Silva. 2013. “The Search for Elusive Social Media Data: An Evolving Librarian-Faculty Collaboration.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 39(5):378–84.
32. Roemer, RobinChin, and Rachel Borchardt. 2012. “From Bibliometrics to Altmetrics: A Changing Scholarly Landscape.” College & Research Libraries News 73(10):596–600.
33. Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media. n.d. “Zotero: About.” https://www.zotero.org/about/
34. Schaeffer, Peggy. 2014. “Ecology and Evolution Integrates with Dryad.” Dryad News and Views, January 22. http://blog.datadryad.org/2014/01/21/ecology-and-evolution-integrates-with-dryad/
35. Schulte, StephanieJ. 2012. “Embedded Academic Librarianship: A Review of the Literature.” Evidence Based Library & Information Practice 7(4):122–38.
36. Sidlauskas, Brian. 2011. “Crowdsourcing Via Social Media Allows Rapid Remote Taxonomic Identification.” National Museum of Natural History Unearthed, March 22. http://nmnh.typepad.com/100years/2011/03/crowdsourcing-via-social-media-allows-rapid-remote-taxonomic-identification-.html
37. Suber, Peter. 2013. “Open Access Overview.” Earlham College. http://bit.ly/oa-overview
38. Wiggins, Andrea, Greg Newman, RobertD. Stevenson, and Kevin Crowston. 2011. “Mechanisms for Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science.” http://crowston.syr.edu/system/files/PID2090593.pdf
39. Willinsky, John. 2006. “The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship.” MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262512664_Download_the_full_text.pdf.
40. Zaugg, Holt, Richard West, Isaku Tateishi, and DanielL. Randall. 2011. “Mendeley: Creating Communities of Scholarly Inquiry through Research Collaboration.” TechTrends 55(1):32–36.