Spatial regularization, planning instruments and urban land market in a post-socialist society: The case of Belgrade

Habitat International

Volumn 48, Issue , 2015, Pages 65-78

  Zeković, Slavka ^a   Vujošević, Miodrag ^a   Maričić, Tamara ^a  

^a Institute of Architecture and Urban and Spatial Planning of Serbia   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Belgrade; Post socialist transformation; Serbia; Urban land policy; Urban sprawl

Indexed keywords

LAND MARKET; LAND USE PLANNING; METROPOLITAN AREA; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY; URBAN POPULATION;

BELGRADE; SERBIA;

EID: 84926015860     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alonso W. Location and land use 1964, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
2. Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states: From adjustment to reinvention 2006, Ashgate, Aldershot, ARGE Donau project. http://www.argedonau.de, U. Altrock, S. Güntner, S. Huning, D. Peters (Eds.).
3. Arsić M. Da li je privatizacija glavni krivac za gubitak radnih mesta u Srbiji?. Kvartalni Monitor 2013, 34:71-73.
4. Begović B., Mijatović B., Hiber D. Privatizacija državnog zemljišta u Srbiji 2006, CLDS, Belgrade.
5. Bertaud A. Land markets, government interventions, and housing affordability 2010, Working paper no. 18, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
6. Bertaud A. Government intervention and urban land markets: the case of China. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 2012, 29(4):335-346.
7. Bertaud A., Renaud B. Socialist cities without land markets. Journal of Urban Economics 1997, 41(1):137-151.
8. Bromley D.W. Formalising property relations in the developing world: the wrong prescription for the wrong malady. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(1):20-27.
9. Brueckner J.K. Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 2000, 23(2):160-171.
10. Deda L. The new housing market in Tirana. Housing change in east and Central Europe: Integration or fragmentation? 2003, Ashgate, Aldershot. S. Lowe, S. Tsenkova (Eds.).
11. Dimitrovska-Andrews K. Housing and urbanisation in Slovenia: between the EU context and local practice. ENHR international conference: Housing in an expending Europe: Theory, policy implementation, and participation. Ljubljana 2006.
12. Dovenyi Z., Kovacs Z. Budapest - the Post-socialist metropolitan periphery between 'Catching up' and individual development path. European Spatial Research and Policy 2006, 13(2):23-41.
13. ESPON 1.1.3 ESPON project 1.1.3, Luxembourg 2006, http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/ThematicProjects/EnlargementPolycentrism/full_revised_version_113.pdf.
14. European Commission (EC) Danube space study. Regional and territorial aspects of the development in the Danube countries with respect on the impacts to the European Union. European Commission DG: Regional policy 2000, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/danube_en.htm.
15. European Environment Agency (EEA) Corine land cover - CLC raster/vector data sets (for 1990) 2013, URL, (Accessed 23.03.14). http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-map.
16. Generalni plan Beograda 2021 [Master Urban Plan of Belgrade 2021] Službeni List Grada beograda, 27/03, 25/05, 34/07, 63/09 and 70/14 2003.
17. Hadžić M., Zeković S. Effects of the process of deindustrialization and the concept of reindustrialization strategy of Serbia. 2nd International Scientific Conference development, spatial planning and strategic governance - RESPAG 2013, Conference Proceedings 2013, 410-421. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, Belgrade. M. Vujošević, S. Milijić (Eds.).
18. Hirt S. Suburbanizing Sofia: characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. Urban Geography 2007, 28(8):755-780.
19. Kährik A., Tammaru T. Suburbanisation and socio-spatial segregation in the Tallinn metropolitan area. ENHR international Conference: Housing in an expending Europe: Theory, policy implementation, and participation. Ljubljana 2006.
20. Marcuse P. Privatization and its discontents: property rights in land and housing in the transition in Eastern Europe. Cities after socialism - urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies 1996, Blackwell, Oxford, UK. G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, I. Szelenyi (Eds.).
21. Reforms in Serbia: Achievements and challenges 2008, CLDS, Belgrade. http://www.clds.org.rs/newsite/Reforme08-eng.pdf, B. Mijatović (Ed.).
22. Nellis J. Time to rethinking privatization in transition economies. Finance and Development 1999, 36(2):16-19.
23. Novák J., Sýkora L. Acity in motion: time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of the Prague metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 2007, 89(2):147-168.
24. Nozdrina N.N., Toda Y. The apartment and cottages in urban and suburban Moscow: 2004-2005. ENHR international Conference: Housing in an expending Europe: Theory, policy implementation, and participation. Ljubljana 2006.
25. Nuissl H., Haase D., Lanzendorf M., Wittlmer H. Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions - a context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(2):414-424.
26. OECD Cities and climate change 2010, OECD, Paris.
27. Pichler-Milanovic N. Urban housing markets in Central and Eastern Europe: convergence, divergence or policy 'collapse'. European Journal of Housing Policy 2001, 1(2):145-187.
28. PlaNet CenSE Metropolitan networking in CenSE backed by North - South Rail Corridors. Final report of the pilot projects 2006, Österreichisches Institut für Raumplanung, Wien.
29. Pravilnik o opštim pravilima za parcelaciju, regulaciju i izgradnju [Ordinance on common rules for land parcelation, regulation and construction], Službeni Glasnik RS, 50/2011.
30. Rašević M., Penev G. Demografska slika Beograda na početku 21. veka. Stanovništvo 2006, 1:81-96.
31. Ravetz J., Loibl W. The dynamics of the peri-urban: global change and regional response. Peri-urbanization in Europe. Towards European policies to sustain urban-rural futures 2011, PLUREL consortium., Copenhagen, Syntesis Report. A. Piorr, I. Tosics, J. Ravetz (Eds.).
32. Regionalni prostorni plan administrativnog područja grada Beograda (RPP APB) [Regional Spatial Plan of Administrative Area of the City of Belgrade], 2004. Službeni List Grada Beograda, 10/04 and 38/11.
33. Republički geodetski zavod (RGZ) (2013). - Data received in informal communication.
34. Republički geodetski zavod (RGZ) Katastar nepokretnosti 2014, (Accessed 05.02.14). http://katastar.rgz.gov.rs/KnWebPublic/.
35. RZS Saopštenje ZP21 SRB019 ZP21 310114, No. 19-LXIV 2014, RZS, Beograd.
36. Salukvadze J. Good governance and natural resources tenure in Eastern Europe and CIS region 2008, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Land Tenure Working Paper 3.
37. SKGO Finansiranje komunalnog opremanja grad{stroke}evinskog zemljišta u lokalnim samoupravama Hrvatske, Slovenije, Crne Gore i Nemačke - iskustva i preporuke za Srbiju 2013, SKGO, Beograd.
38. Slaev A., Nikiforov I. Factors of urban sprawl in Bulgaria. Spatium International Review 2013, 29:22-29.
39. Solé-Ollé A., Viladecans-Marsal E. Do political parties matter for land use policies?. Journal of Urban Economics 2013, 78:42-56.
40. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 2011 census of population, households and dwellings in the Republic of Serbia 2014, Statistical Office of Republic of Serbia, Belgrade.
41. Stiglitz J.E. Whither reform? Ten years of the transition. Paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1999, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
42. Sykora L., Bouzarovski S. Multiple transformations: conceptualising the Post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies 2011, 49(1):43-60.
43. Thomas M. Thinking about planning in the transitional countries of Central and Eastern Europe. International Planning Studies 1998, 3(3):321-331.
44. Tosics I., Hegedus J., Remmert M. Housing in southeastern Europe: between state and market. South-East Europe Review 2001, 4:123-150.
45. Tsenkova S. Urban planning and informal cities in Southeast Europe. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 2012, 9(4):292-305.
46. TURaS Report on the balance between planning and the market relating to sustainable and resilient development of suburban areas 2014, Work package 5, Deliverable 5.6, unpublished report, September 30.
47. UN-HABITAT Four strategic themes for the housing policy in Serbia 2006, UN-HABITAT Settlement and Integration of Refugees Programme in Serbia, Belgrade.
48. UN-Habitat The state of European cities in transition 2013. Taking stock after 20 years of reform 2013, UN-Habitat & Institute of Urban Development, Nairobi / Krakow. http://unhabitat.org/the-state-of-european-cities-in-transition-2013-taking-stock-after-20-years-of-reform/.
49. Uredba o uslovima i načinu pod kojima lokalna samouprava može da otud{stroke}i ili da u zakup grad{stroke}evinsko zemljište po ceni, manjoj od tržišne cene, odnosno zakupnine ili bez naknade, [Regulation on the conditions and approach under which local authority may alienate or give for rent buildable land at price lower than market price or rent or without compensation]. Službeni Glasnik RS, 54/2011.
50. Vujošević M., Nedović-Budić Z. Planning and societal context - the case of Belgrade, Serbia. Urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe: Space, institutions and policy 2006, Springer, Heidelberg. S. Tsenkova, Z. Nedović-Budić (Eds.).
51. Vujošević M., Zeković S., Maričić T. Post-socijalistička tranzicija u Srbiji i teritorijalni capital Srbije: stanje, neki budući izgledi i predvidljivi scenariji 2010, IAUS, Beograd.
52. Vujošević M., Zeković S., Maričić T. Post-socialist transition in Serbia and its unsustainable path. European Planning Studies 2012, 20(10):1707-1727.
53. Vujovic S., Petrovic M. Belgrade's post-socialist urban evolution: Reflections by the actors in the development process. The GeoJournal Library 2007, Vol. 92:361-383. Springer, New York. K. Stanilov (Ed.).
54. Wang L., Potter C., Li Z. Crisis-induced reform, state-market relations, and entrepreneurial urban growth in China. Habitat International 2014, 41:50-57.
55. Wehrmann B. Governance of land tenure in Eastern Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2010, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Land Tenure Working Paper 16.
56. World Bank Serbia investment climate assessment 2004, Accessed 26.03.11. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTECAREGTOPKNOECO/Resources/IC_SerbiaDraft.pdf.
57. Zakon o javnoj svojini [Law on Public Property] Službeni Glasnik RS, 72/2011, 88/2013 and 105/2014.
58. Zakon o šumama [Law on Forests]. Službeni Glasnik RS, 30/2010 and 93/2012.
59. Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji [Law on Planning and Construction]. Službeni Glasnik RS, 72/2009. http://siepa.gov.rs/files/pdf2010/ENG_Law_on_Planning_and_Construction.pdf.
60. Zakon o poljoprivrednom zemljištu [Law on Agricultural Land]. Službeni Glasnik RS, 62/2006 and 41/2009.
61. Zakon o porezima na imovinu [Law on Property Tax]. Službeni Glasnik RS, 47/2013.
62. Zeković S. Evaluation of the current urban land system in Serbia. Spatium International Review 2008, 17-18:55-60.
63. Zeković S., Vujošević V. Urban land policy in Serbia. Spatial development strategy of the Republic of Serbia 2009-2013-2020 2009, Republic Agency for Spatial Planning, Belgrade.
64. Zeković S., Vujošević M. Some global challenges for socio-economic growth in the South-East Europe: the role of industrial policy. 2nd Conference of LSEE's research network on social cohesion in south east Europe "Post-crisis recovery in Southeast Europe and beyond: Policy challenges for social and economic inclusion" 2014, LSEE, London.