A special healing pattern in stable metaphyseal fractures

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 238-242

  Chen, Wen Tao ^a   Han, Da Cheng ^a   Zhang, Pei Xun ^a   Han, Na ^a   Kou, Yu Hui ^a   Yin, Xiao Feng ^a   Jiang, Bao Guo ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE NECROSIS; BONE SCREW; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURE; FRACTURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; FRACTURE HEALING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; RABBIT; STABLE METAPHYSEAL FRACTURE; TIBIA; TIBIA OSTEOTOMY; TRABECULAR BONE; ANIMAL; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; OSTEOTOMY; PATHOLOGY; TIBIAL FRACTURES;

ANIMALS; BONE RESORPTION; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; FRACTURE HEALING; OSTEONECROSIS; OSTEOTOMY; RABBITS; TIBIA; TIBIAL FRACTURES;

EID: 84925965525     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.1003127     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aspenberg P, Sandberg O. Distal radial fracture heal by direct woven bone formation. Acta Orthop 2013; 84: 297-300.
2. Charnley J, Baker S L. Compression arthrodesis of the knee; a clinical and histological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1952; 34: 187-99.
3. Claes L, Augat P, Suger G, Wilke H J. Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J Orthop Res 1997; 15: 577-84.
4. Claes L, Veeser A, Gockelmann M, Simon U, Ignatius A. A novel model to study metaphyseal bone healing under defined biomechanical conditions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 923-8.
5. Dempster D W, Compston J E, Drezner M K, Glorieux F H, Kanis J A, Malluche H, Meunier P J, Ott S M, Recker R R, Parfitt A M. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2013; 28: 2-17.
6. Fan W, Crawford R, Xiao Y. Structural and cellular differences between metaphyseal and diaphyseal periosteum in different aged rats. Bone 2008; 42: 81-9.
7. Jarry L, Uhthoff H K. Differences in healing of metaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures. Can J Surg 1971; 14: 127-35.
8. Nunamaker D M. Experimental models of fracture repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 355: S56-65.
9. Parfitt A M, Drezner M K, Glorieux F H, Kanis J A, Malluche H, Meunier P J, Ott S M, Recker R R. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2: 595-610.
10. Rabie A B, Dan Z, Samman N. Ultrastructural identification of cells involved in the healing of intramembranous and endochondral bones. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 25: 383-8.
11. Sandberg O, Aspenberg P. Different effects of indomethacin on healing of shaft and metaphyseal fractures. Acta Orthop 2014 Oct 17: 1-5. [Epub ahead of print].
12. Shapiro F. Bone development and its relation to fracture repair. The role of mesenchymal osteoblasts and surface osteoblasts. Eur Cell Mater 2008; 15: 53-76.
13. Stuermer E K, Sehmisch S, Tezval M, Tezval H, Rack T, Boekhoff J, Wuttke W, Herrmann TR, Seidlova-Wuttke D, Stuermer K M. Effect of testosterone, raloxifene and estrogen replacement on the microstructure and biomechanics of metaphyseal osteoporotic bones in orchiectomized male rats. World J Urol 2009; 27: 547-55.
14. Uhthoff H K, Rahn B A. Healing patterns of metaphyseal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; 160: 295-303.