The Comparative Method

The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 127-143

  Weiss, Michael ^a  

^a Institute for Psycholinguistics   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925867924     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Alpher, Barry. 2004. Pama-Nyungan: phonological reconstruction and status as a phylogenetic group. In Claire Bowern and Harold Koch (eds) Australian languages: classib cation and the comparative method. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 93–126.
2. Beekes, Robert S. P. 1994. Who were the laryngeals? In J. E. Rasmussen (ed.) In honorem Holger Pedersen. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 449–454.
3. Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Blevins, Juliette and Sven Grawunder. 2009. KL TL sound change in Germanic and elsewhere: descriptions, explanations and implications. Linguistic Typology 13: 267–303.
5. Bloombeld, Leonard. 1925. On the sound system of Central Algonquian. Language 1: 130–156.
6. Bloombeld, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.
7. Bloombeld, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. In Harry Hoijer and Cornelius Osgood, (eds) Linguistic structures of Native America. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 85–129.
8. Blust, Robert A. 2009. The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacib c Linguistics. Campbell, Lyle. in press. Language isolates and their history, or, what’s weird, anyway? Berkeley Linguistic Society.
9. Campbell, Lyle and Terrence Kaufman. 1985. Mayan linguistics: where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 187–198.
10. Campbell, Lyle, and William John Poser. 2008. Language classib cation: history and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Chang, Steve S., Madeline C. Plauché and John J. Ohala. 2001. Markedness and consonant confusion asymmetries. In Elizabeth V. Hume and Keith Johnson (eds) The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, 79–101.
12. Considine, John. 2008. Did Andreas Jäger or Georg Caspar Kirchmaier write the dissertation De lingua vetustissima Europae (1686)? Historiographia Linguistica 35: 13–22.
13. Cser, Andrá s. 2003. The typology and modelling of obstruent lenition and fortition processes. Budapest: Akadé miai Kiadó.
14. Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Fallon, Paul D. 2002. The synchronic and diachronic phonology of ejectives. New York: Routledge.
16. Fischer, Wolfdietrich and Otto Jastrow. 1980. Handbuch der arabischen Dialekte. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
17. Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic reconstruction: an introduction to theory and method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Garrett, Andrew and Keith Johnson. 2013. Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.) Origins of sound change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–96.
19. Georg, Stefan. 2004. Review of Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages. Diachronica 21: 445–450.
20. Gould, Marian K. 1917. Sanpoil Tales. In Franz Boas (ed.) Folk-tales of Salishan and Sahaptin Tribes. Lancaster, PA: New Era Printing, 101–113.
21. Guion, Susan. 1998. The role of perception in the sound change of velar palatalization. Phonetica 55: 18–52.
22. Greenberg, Joseph H. 2000. Indo-European and its closest relatives: the Eurasiatic language family. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23. Hale, Mark. 2007. Historical linguistics: theory and method. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24. Hale, Mark. 2012. Foundational concepts in the scientib c study of sound change. In Maria-Josep Solé and Daniel Recasens (eds) The initiation of sound change: perception, production and social factors. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 235–246.
25. Haudricourt, André-Georges and Françoise Ozanne-Rivierre. 1982. Dictionnaire thématique des langues de la région de Hienghene. SELAF: Paris.
26. Hoenigswald, Henry. 1950. The principle step in comparative grammar. Language 26: 357–364.
27. Hoenigswald, Henry. 1960. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Kessler, Brett and Annukka Lehtonen. 2006. Multilateral comparison and signib cance testing of the Indo-Uralic question. In Peter Forster and Colin Renfrew (eds), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 33–42.
29. Khabtagaeva, Bayarma. 2009. Mongolic elements in Tuvan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
30. Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. Phonological basis of sound change. In John Goldsmith (ed.) Handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 640–670.
31. Koerner, E. F. Konrad. 1977. Sulla origine e storia dell’asterisco nella linguistica storica: Un cenno storiograb co. In Raffaele Simone and Ugo Vignuzzi (eds) Problemi della ricostruzione in linguistica. Rome: Bulzoni, 253–258.
32. Kondrak, Grzegorz. 2009. Identib cation of cognates and recurrent sound correspondences in word lists. Traitement Automatique des Langues et Langues Anciennes 50: 201–235.
33. Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The Dravidian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2007. Konsonantenwandel. Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
35. Kury_owicz, Jerzy. 1964. The in_ ectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.
36. Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
37. Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
38. Maddieson, Ian. 2011. Absence of Common Consonants. In Matthew S Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 18. [Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/18; accessed on 7 November 2013].
39. Matisoff, James. 1990. On megalocomparison. Language 66: 106–120.
40. Matisoff, James. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. McAlpin, David W. 2003. Velars, uvulars, and the North Dravidian hypothesis. Journal of the American Oriental Society 123: 521–546.
42. Meeussen, Achille E. 1967. Bantu grammatical reconstructions. Annales du Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, 61: 81–121.
43. Meira, Sérgio and Bruna Franchetto. 2005. The Southern Cariban languages and the Cariban family. International Journal of American Linguistics 71(2): 127–192.
44. Nichols, Johanna. 2010. Proving Dene-Yeniseian genealogical relatedness. The Dene-Yeniseian connection. Fairbanks: Department of Anthropology, University of Alaska at Fairbanks, 299–309.
45. Poser, William J. 2004. Dating velar palatalization in Carrier. Alaska Native Language Archive. [www.uaf.edu/anla/item.xml?id=CN998P2004].
46. Pozdniakov, K. I. 1993. Sravnitel’naia grammatika atlanticheskikh iazykov: imennye klassy i fonomorfologiia. Moscow: Nauka.
47. Ringe, Don and Joseph Eska. 2013. Historical linguistics: toward a twenty-b rst century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Sapir, J. David. 1971. West Atlantic: an inventory of the languages, their noun class systems and consonant alternation. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Current trends in linguistics. Volume 7: Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Hague: Mouton, 45–112.
49. Schleicher, August. 1852. Die Formenlehre der kirchenslawischen Sprache. Bonn: H. B. König.
50. Segerer, Guillaume. 2010. Isolates in Atlantic. Paper presented at the Workshop on Language Isolates in Africa. Lyon, December 2010.
51. Simpson, Andrew K. 2003. Pharyngeal consonants in historical perspective. Unpublished Ms. University of California, Berkeley.
52. Starostin, Sergei A. 2005. Response to Stefan Georg’s review of the Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages. Diachronica 22: 451–454.
53. Steiner, Lydia, Peter F. Stadler and Michael Cysouw. 2011. A pipeline for computational historical linguistics. Language Dynamics and Change 1: 89–127.
54. Tagliavini, Carlo. 1998. Einfü hrung in die romanische Philologie. Tü bingen: A. Francke.
55. Trubetzkoy, N. S. 2001 [1939]. Thoughts on the Indo-European problem. In Anatoly Liberman (ed.) N. S. Trubetzkoy. Studies in general linguistics and language structure. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 87–98. Translated by Marvin Taylor and Anatoly Liberman from ‘Gedanken ü ber das Indogermanenproblem’. Acta linguistica (Copenhagen) 1: 81–89 with the additions translated from the original Russian manuscript b rst published in Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1958 7: 65–77.
56. De Vaan, Michiel. 2008. On Wanderwörter and substrate words in etymological research. In Marijke Mooijaart and Marijke van der Wal (eds) Yesterday’s words: contemporary, current and future lexicography. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 199–207.
57. Wakelin, Martyn Francis. 1975. Language and history in Cornwall. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
58. Weiss, Michael. 2011. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin. 2nd corrected reprint. Beech Stave Press: Ann Arbor.
59. Weiss, Michael. 2013. Italo-Celtica: linguistic and cultural points of contact between italic and celtic. In Stephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert and Brent Vine (eds) Proceedings of the 23rd Annual UCLA Indo- European Conference. Bremen: Hempen, 151–173.
60. Widdison, Kirk. A. 1997. Phonetic explanations for sibilant pattern in Spanish. Lingua 102: 253–264.
61. Wolff, John U. 2010. Proto-Austronesian phonology with glossary. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.
62. Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English dialect grammar. Henry Frowde: Oxford.