Perceptions of the impact of intergenerational programming on the physical well-being of participants in adult day services

Journal of Intergenerational Relationships

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 355-370

  Weintraub, Aaron P C ^a   Killian, Timothy S ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Intergenerational programming; Physical well being; Qualitative analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925862482     PISSN: 15350770     EISSN: 15350932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15350770903285312     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alpass, F. M., & Neville, S. (2003). Loneliness, health and depression in older males. Aging and Mental Health, 7(3), 212-216.
2. Berry, (2002). Viewpoints. Research in Dance Education, 7(2), 235-246.
3. Bogardus, S. T., Bradley, E., & Tinetti, M., E. (1998). A taxonomy for goal setting in the care of persons with dementia. Journal of Gerontological Internal Medicine, 13, 675-680.
4. Camp, C. J., Judge, K. S., Bye, C. A., Fox, K. M., Bowden, J., Bell, M., et al. (1997). An intergenerational program for persons with dementia using using Montessori methods. The Gerontologis, 37(5), 688-692.
5. Chamberlain, V. M., Fetterman, E., & Maher, M. (1994). Innovation in elder and child care: An intergenerational experience. Educational Gerontology, 19, 193-204.
6. Colston, L., Harper, S., & Mitchener-Colston, W. (1995). Volunteering to promote fitness and caring: A motive for linking college students with mature adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 20(1), 79-90.
7. Daatland, S. O. (1996). Adapting the Scandinavian model of care for the elderly. In Caring for frail elderly people: Policies in evolution (Social Policy Studies, No. 19). Paris: OECD.
8. Fried, L. P., Ferrucci, L., Darer, J., Williamson, & J. D., Anderson, G. (2004). Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty and comorbidity: Implications for improved targeting and care. Journal of Gerontology, 59A(3), 255-263.
9. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. New York: SUNY Press.
10. Jarrott, S. E., Gigliotti, C. M., & Smock, S. A. (2006). Where do we stand? Testing the foundation of a shared site intergenerational program. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(2), 73-92.
11. Kilian, R., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M., (2001). The impact of chronic illness on subjective quality of life: A comparison between general population and hospital inpatients with somatic diseases. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 206-213.
12. Lecompte & Priessle. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in education research. New York: Academic.
13. Mendis, K. (1993). The effects of participation in an intergenerational program on the psychological well-being of the elderly. Doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, UMI Publication Number: AAT9313767.
14. Newman, S., & Smith, T. B. (1999). Developmental theories as the basis for intergenerational programs. In S. Newman, C. R. Ward, T. B. Smith, J. O. Wilson, & J. M. McCrea (Eds.), Intergenerational programs: Past, present, and future (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
15. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 13-21.
16. Tilvis, R., Kahonen, M., Jolkkonen, J., Valvanne, J., Pitkala, K., & Strandberg, T. (2004). Predictors of cognitive decline and mortality of aged people over a 10-year period. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59(3), M268-M274.
17. United Nations. (2002). Report of the second world assembly on aging (sales No. E. 02. IV. 4). New York: Author.
18. Wilson, J. (2004). Frailty and its dangerous side effects might be preventable. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141(6), 489.