Social media for diabetes health education -inclusive or exclusive?

Current Diabetes Reviews

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 284-290

  Rani Pal, B ^a  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diabetes; E learning; Education; Peer support; Self management; Social media

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIABETES EDUCATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MASS COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CARE; SOCIAL MEDIA; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH LITERACY; HEALTH PROMOTION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH LITERACY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PUBLIC HEALTH; SELF CARE; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84925858525     PISSN: 15733998     EISSN: 18756417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1573399810666141015094316     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Cline RJW, Haynes KM, Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001; 16 (6): 671-692. doi: 10.1093/her/16.6.671 accessed June 30 2014
2. Grandinetti, DA Doctors and the Web: help your patients surf the Net safely. Medical Economics, 2000 April; 28-34. http://her.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/6/671.long#ref-52 accessed July 8 2014
3. Fox S, “Peer-to-peer Healthcare” Pew Internet: 2011; February 28. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/P2PHealthcare.aspx accessed July 8 2014
4. Robinson TN, Patrick K, Eng TR, Gustafson D. An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. J Am Med Asso 1998; 280: 1264-1269.
5. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Research paper. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet 2012; 380 (9836): 37-43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2.
6. Holman N, Forouhi NG, Goyder E, Wild SH. The Association of Public Health Observatories (APHO) Diabetes Prevalence Model: estimates of total diabetes prevalence for England, 2010-2030. Diabet Med 2011; 28(5): 575-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03216.x.
7. Collins SE, Lewis DM, Social media made easy: Guiding patients to credible online health information and engagement resources. Clinical Diabetes 2013; 31 (3): 137-41. http://clinical.diabetes journals.org/content/31/3/137.full#ref-6
8. Berkman N, DeWalt D, Pignone M, et al. Literacy and Health Outcomes (AHRQ Publication No. 04-E007-2). 2004; Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
9. Closing the Gap: Policy into Practice on Social Determinants of Health. Discussion paper for the 2011 World Conference on Social Determinants of Health. http://www.who.int/sdhconference/Discussion-paper-EN.pdf Accessed 2014, July 8 2014
10. Cavanaugh TA. Double-effect reasoning: doing good and avoiding evil. New York, NY: Clarendon Press; 2006. Search Google Scholar
11. Chretien KC, Azar J, Kind T Physicians on Twitter. JAMA 2011; 305: 566-568. CrossRefMedline Search Google Scholar http://her.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/6/671.long
12. Stevenson SE, Peck LA I am eating a sandwich now: intent and foresight in the Twitter age. J Mass Media Ethics 2011; 26: 56-65.
13. CrossRef Search Google Scholar
14. Ryan M. Guiding principles for physician use of social media. Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media. Published March 13, 2012, accessed July 8 2014 http://socialmedia.mayoclinic.org/2012/03/13/guiding-principles-for-physician-use-of-social-media/
15. Risk A, Dzenowagis J, Review of internet health information quality initiatives. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3(4): e28. doi:10.2196/ jmir.3.4.e28
16. Social media: how doctors can contribute. Lancet 2012; 379: 1562. Medline
17. Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK, Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25: 942-946. CrossRefMedline Search Google Scholar
18. Svinivki M, McKeachie WJ. McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. 2011; Thirteenthth ed Wadsworth; Belmont, CA.
19. Fox S. Peer-to-Peer Healthcare. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2011. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/P2PHealthcare.aspx.
20. Barton AJ, Skiba DJ. Creating Social Media Policies for Education and Practice Nurs Inform. 2012; 2012: 016.
21. www.e-lfh.org.uk 2013; PDF accessed 2014 via http://www.elearning.nhs.uk/media/e-LfH%20Mar%202013%20projects%20 booklet%20final.pdf
22. Rudd RE, Moeykens BA, Colton T. Health and Literacy: A review of the medical and public health literature. 1999; chapter 5 in Comings JP, Smith C, Garner B (eds), Annual Review of Adult Learning and Literacy. San Francisco CA: Josey-Bass.
23. Rudd RE & Keller DB. Health Literacy: New developments and research. J Comm Healthcare 2009; 2(3): 240-257.
24. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2011. Health Literacy Interventions and Outcomes: an Update of the Literacy and Health Outcomes Systematic Review of Literature, 2011.
25. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. J Am Med Asso 2002; 288(4): 475-482. doi:10.1001/jama.288.4.475.
26. Rudd, R. Improving Americans' health literacy. New England J Med 2010; 363(24): 2283-85.
27. Parker R, Ratzan SC. Health Literacy: a second decade of distinction for Americans. J Health Comm 2010; 15(Suppl 2): 20-33.
28. Chretien KC, Kind T, Social Media and Clinical Care -Ethical, Professional, and Social Implications (in Social Media as a Tool in Medicine) Circulation 2013; 127: 1413-1421 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.128017 https://circ.ahajournals.org/content/127/13/1413.full
29. Gabbard GO, Kassaw KA, Perez-Garcia G Professional boundaries in the era of the Internet. Acad Psychiatry 2011; 35: 168-174. CrossRefMedline Search Google Scholar
30. Guseh JS II, Brendel RW, Brendel DH Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics 2009; 35: 584-586. Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care January 2003; vol. 26 no. suppl 1: s33-s50 doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.S33
32. Fox S. Mobile Health 2010: Pew internet Research Project. October 19, 2010; http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/10/19/mobilehealth-2010/
33. Alaszewski A, Risk communication -identifying the importance of social context. Health Risk and Society 2005; 7 (2): 101-105.
34. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Funnell MM, Siminerio LM. Access to diabetes self-management education: Results of national surveys of patients, educators, and physicians. Diabetes Educ 2009; 35: 246-248, 252-246, 258-263 Search Google Scholar
35. Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH, Online Social Networking by Patients with Diabetes: A Qualitative Evaluation of Communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med Mar 2011; 26(3): 287-292. Published online Oct 13, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1526-3
36. Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, Macario A Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e95. CrossRefMedline Search Google Scholar
37. Rosland A, Keiffer E, Israel B, et al., When is social support important? The association of family support and professional support with specific diabetes self-management behaviors. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23(12): 1992-1999. Published online Oct 15, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0814-7
38. Shaffer-Hudkins E, Johnson N, Melton S, Social Media Use by Individuals with Diabetes. 2013: accessed July 2014 via http://hscweb3.hsc.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Social-Media.pdf