An agenda for the ethics of risk

The Ethics of Technological Risk

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 11-24

  Hansson, Sven Ove ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925825285     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849772990     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Abbott, P. (1978) ‘Philosophers and the abortion question’, Political Theory, vol 6, pp313–335
2. Clausen Mork, J. and Hansson, S. O. (2007) ‘Eurocodes and REACH – differences and similarities’, Risk Management, vol 9, pp19–35
3. Cranor, C. F. (1997) ‘The normative nature of risk assessment: features and possibilities’, Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, vol 8, pp123–136
4. Dworkin, R. (1981) ‘What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol 10, pp283–345
5. Fischhoff, B., Watson, S. R. and Hope, C. (1984) ‘Defining risk’, Policy Sciences, vol 17, pp123–139
6. Fleurbaey, M. (2001) ‘Egalitarian opportunities’, Law and Philosophy, vol 20, pp499–530
7. Hansson, S. O. (1989) ‘Dimensions of risk’, Risk Analysis, vol 9, pp107–112
8. Hansson, S. O. (1995) ‘The detection level’, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol 22, pp103–109
9. Hansson, S. O. (1998) Setting the Limit. Occupational Health Standards and the Limits of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford
10. Hansson, S. O. (1999) ‘The moral significance of indetectable effects’, Risk, vol 10, pp101–108
11. Hansson, S. O. (2001) ‘The modes of value’, Philosophical Studies, vol 104, pp33–46
12. Hansson, S. O. (2003a) ‘Ethical criteria of risk acceptance’, Erkenntnis, vol 59, pp291– 309
13. Hansson, S. O. (2003b) ‘Are natural risks less dangerous than technological risks?’, Philosophia Naturalis, vol 40, pp43–54
14. Hansson, S. O. (2004) ‘Weighing risks and benefits’, Topoi, vol 23, pp145–152
15. Hansson, S. O. (2005) ‘Extended antipaternalism’, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol 31, pp 97– 100
16. Hansson, S. O. (2006a) ‘Informed consent out of context’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol 63, pp149–154
17. Hansson, S. O. (2006b) ‘Uncertainty and the ethics of clinical trials’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, vol 27, pp149–167
18. Hansson, S. O. (2007a) ‘Philosophical problems in cost-benefit analysis’, Economics and Philosophy, vol 23, pp163–183
19. Hansson, S. O. (2007b) ‘Risk’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/risk/
20. Hansson, S. O. (2008) ‘Regulating BFRs – from science to policy’, Chemosphere, vol 73, pp144–147
21. Hansson, S. O. and Rudén, C. (2006) ‘Evaluating the risk decision process’, Toxicology, vol 218, pp100–111
22. Hermansson, H. and Hansson, S. O. (2007) ‘A three party model tool for ethical risk analysis’, Risk Management, vol 9, no 3, pp 129–144
23. Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. (1957) Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York
24. MacLean, D. (ed.) (1986) Values at Risk, Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ
25. Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
26. National Research Council (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
27. Otway, H. (1987) ‘Experts, risk communication, and democracy’, Risk Analysis, vol 7, pp125–129
28. Rechard, R. P. (1999) ‘Historical relationship between performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal and other types of risk assessment’, Risk Analysis, vol 19, no 5, pp763–807
29. Ripstein, A. (1999) Equality, Responsibility and the Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
30. Rosebury, B. (1995) ‘Moral responsibility and “moral luck”’, Philosophical Review, vol 104, pp499–524
31. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991) Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms, University of California Press, Berkeley
32. Thomson, P. B. (1985) ‘Risking or being willing: Hamlet and the DC-10’, Journal of Value Inquiry, vol 19, pp301–310