Nanotechnologies and the law of patents: A collision course

Nanotechnology Risk, Ethics and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 225-236

  Vaidhyanathan, Siva ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925822303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849772051     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Almeling, D. S. (2004) ‘Patenting nanotechnology, problems with the utility requirement’, Stanford Technology Law Review, vol 4, pp42–48
2. Ben-Atar, D. S. (2004) Trade Secrets, Intellectual Piracy and the Origins of American Industrial Power, New Haven, Yale University Press
3. Boyle, J. et al (1996) Law and the Construction of the Information Society, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
4. Burk, D. L. and Lemley, M. A. (2003) ‘Policy levers in patent law’, Virginia Law Review, vol 89, p1575
5. Chung, J. (2004) ‘Panning out’, Technology Review, October 2004, no. 37. p37
6. Correa, C. M. (1995) ‘The management of international intellectual property’, International Journal of Technology Management, vol 10, no. 2-3 (1995), pp151–364. Geneva, Switzerland, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. with the assistance and cooperation of UNESCO
7. Correa, C. M. (1997) ‘Regímenes De control de la transferencia de tecnología en América Latina’, Serie Monografías/Banco Interamericano De Desarrollo Instituto Para La Integración De America Latina, no. 5, Buenos Aires, Instituto para la Integracio´n de América Latina Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
8. Correa, C. M. (2000) Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO, and Developing Countries: The Trips Agreement and Policy Options, London, Zed Books
9. Correa, C. M. and Yusuf, A. (1998) Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement, London and Boston, Kluwer Law International
10. Crouch, D. (2005) ‘PTO moves forward with nanotechnology classification’, http://patentlaw.typepad.com/patent/2005/05/pto_moves_forwa.html accessed 9 May 2005
11. Drahos, P. (2002) ‘Negotiating intellectual property rights, between coercion and dialogue’, in Drahos, P. and Mayne, R. (eds) Global Intellectual Property Rights, Knowledge, Access, and Development, New York, Palgrave, pp161–182
12. Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J. (2003) Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? New York, New Press
13. Featherstone, D. and Specht, M. (2004) ‘Nanotechnology patents, a snapshot of nanotechnology patenting through an analysis of 10 top nanotech patents’, Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, vol 16(12), pp19–24
14. Fritz, S. and Scientific American (2002) Understanding Nanotechnology, New York, Warner Books
15. Huang, Z. (2003) ‘Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering, country, institution, and technology field’, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol 5, pp333–363
16. Jaffe, A. B. and Lerner, J. (2004) Innovation and its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do about it, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
17. Krimsky, S. (2003) Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield
18. Miller, J. C. (2005) The Handbook of Nanotechnology, Business, Policy, and Intellectual Property Law, Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley
19. Rai, A.K and Eisenberg, R.S. (2001) ‘The public and the private in biopharmaceutical research’, Duke University School of Law, www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers.html accessed 5 May 2005
20. Regalado, A. (2004) ‘Nanotechnology patents surge as companies vie to stake claim’, The Wall Street Journal, 18 June, p1
21. Ryan, M. P. (1998) Knowledge Diplomacy, Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press
22. Sell, S. K. (2003) ‘Private power, public law: the globalization of intellectual property rights’, Cambridge Studies in International Relations, vol 88, p218
23. Sulston, J. and Ferry, G. (2002) The Common Thread: A Story of Science, Politics, Ethics and the Human Genome, London and New York, Bantam Press
24. Troilo, L. M. (2005) ‘Patentability and enforcement issues related to nanotechnology inventions’, Nanotechnology Law and Business, vol 2(1), pp36–44
25. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2001) Copyrights and Copywrongs, The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity, New York, New York University Press
26. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2004) The Anarchist in the Library: How the Clash between Freedom and Control Is Hacking the Real World and Crashing the System, New York, Basic Books
27. Voigt, R. A (2005) ‘Nanotechnology-related inventions, infringement issues’, Nanotechnology Law and Business, vol 2(1), pp45–53
28. Washburn, J. (2004) University, Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of American Higher Education, New York, Basic Books
29. Westin, A. et al (2004) ‘Nanotechnology, the importance of intellectual property rights in an emerging technology’, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office, vol 86, pp220–236